Suppr超能文献

长期前列腺癌幸存者的衰弱及其与生活质量和情绪健康的关联。

Frailty in Long-Term Prostate Cancer Survivors and Its Association With Quality of Life and Emotional Health.

作者信息

Meissner Valentin H, Imhof Kolja, Jahnen Matthias, Lunger Lukas, Dinkel Andreas, Schiele Stefan, Ankerst Donna P, Gschwend Jürgen E, Herkommer Kathleen

机构信息

Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024 Dec 11;23(1):e247066. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7066.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Frailty is emerging as an important determinant for quality of life (QoL) and emotional health in older patients with cancer, and specifically in long-term prostate cancer survivors, but quantitative studies are lacking. The current study assesses the prevalence of frailty and its association with QoL and emotional health in long-term prostate cancer survivors after radical prostatectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 2,979 prostate cancer survivors from the multicenter German Familial Prostate Cancer cohort completed questionnaires on frailty (Groningen Frailty Indicator [GFI]), QoL (EORTC QoL Questionnaire-Core 30), and emotional health (anxiety/depression symptoms via the Patient Health Questionnaire-4). Modified Poisson regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with frailty.

RESULTS

Average patient age was 79.4 years [SD, 6.4 years] and average time since radical prostatectomy was 17.4 years [SD, 3.8 years]. Among the cohort, 33.1% (n=985) of patients were classified as frail (GFI ≥4). Frail patients reported worse emotional health than nonfrail patients (depression symptoms: 24.0% vs 4.0%; anxiety symptoms: 20.6% vs 2.0%; both P<.001) and lower QoL (mean [SD], 53.4 [19.2] vs 72.7 [16.0]); P<.001). Higher age (relative risk [RR], 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03) and worse depressive (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.12-1.24) and anxiety symptoms (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.11-1.23) were associated with frailty. Living in a partnership (RR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67-0.86) and a higher QoL (RR, 0.86 for a 10-point increase; 95% CI, 0.84-0.89) were associated with nonfrailty.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large German cohort, every third long-term prostate cancer survivor after radical prostatectomy was frail. The association of frailty with lower QoL and poorer mental health indicates the need for an integrated care approach including further geriatric assessment and possible interventions to improve health outcomes targeted to frail patients.

摘要

背景

衰弱正成为老年癌症患者,尤其是长期前列腺癌幸存者生活质量(QoL)和情绪健康的重要决定因素,但缺乏定量研究。本研究评估了根治性前列腺切除术后长期前列腺癌幸存者的衰弱患病率及其与QoL和情绪健康的关联。

患者与方法

来自多中心德国家族性前列腺癌队列的2979名前列腺癌幸存者完成了关于衰弱(格罗宁根衰弱指标[GFI])、QoL(欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QoL问卷核心30)和情绪健康(通过患者健康问卷-4评估焦虑/抑郁症状)的问卷调查。采用修正泊松回归分析评估与衰弱相关的因素。

结果

患者平均年龄为79.4岁[标准差,6.4岁],距根治性前列腺切除术的平均时间为17.4年[标准差,3.8年]。在该队列中,33.1%(n = 985)的患者被归类为衰弱(GFI≥4)。衰弱患者的情绪健康状况比非衰弱患者差(抑郁症状:24.0%对4.0%;焦虑症状:20.6%对2.0%;P均<0.001),QoL也较低(平均值[标准差],53.4[19.2]对72.7[16.0];P<0.001)。年龄较大(相对风险[RR],1.02;95%置信区间,1.01 - 1.03)以及抑郁(RR,1.18;95%置信区间,1.12 - 1.24)和焦虑症状较重(RR,1.17;95%置信区间,从1.11到1.23)与衰弱相关。处于伴侣关系(RR,0.76;95%置信区间,0.67 - 0.86)和较高的QoL(每增加10分RR为0.86;95%置信区间,0.84 - 0.89)与非衰弱相关。

结论

在一个大型德国队列中,每三名根治性前列腺切除术后的长期前列腺癌幸存者中就有一名衰弱。衰弱与较低的QoL和较差的心理健康之间的关联表明需要一种综合护理方法,包括进一步的老年评估以及针对衰弱患者改善健康结局的可能干预措施。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验