• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of a Literature Screening Tool: Few-Shot Learning Approach in Systematic Reviews.文献筛选工具的开发与验证:系统评价中的少样本学习方法
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 11;26:e56863. doi: 10.2196/56863.
2
Improving Systematic Review Updates With Natural Language Processing Through Abstract Component Classification and Selection: Algorithm Development and Validation.通过摘要成分分类和选择利用自然语言处理改进系统评价更新:算法开发与验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Mar 27;13:e65371. doi: 10.2196/65371.
3
Few-Shot Learning for Clinical Natural Language Processing Using Siamese Neural Networks: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.使用暹罗神经网络的临床自然语言处理少样本学习:算法开发与验证研究
JMIR AI. 2023 May 4;2:e44293. doi: 10.2196/44293.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Autonomous International Classification of Diseases Coding Using Pretrained Language Models and Advanced Prompt Learning Techniques: Evaluation of an Automated Analysis System Using Medical Text.使用预训练语言模型和先进提示学习技术的自主国际疾病分类编码:对一个使用医学文本的自动分析系统的评估
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jan 6;13:e63020. doi: 10.2196/63020.
6
Deep Neural Network for Reducing the Screening Workload in Systematic Reviews for Clinical Guidelines: Algorithm Validation Study.深度神经网络在临床指南系统评价中降低筛选工作量的应用:算法验证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 30;22(12):e22422. doi: 10.2196/22422.
7
Technology-assisted title and abstract screening for systematic reviews: a retrospective evaluation of the Abstrackr machine learning tool.技术辅助的系统评价标题和摘要筛选:Abstrackr 机器学习工具的回顾性评估。
Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 12;7(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0707-8.
8
srBERT: automatic article classification model for systematic review using BERT.srBERT:基于 BERT 的系统综述自动文章分类模型。
Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 30;10(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01763-w.
9
Natural language processing was effective in assisting rapid title and abstract screening when updating systematic reviews.自然语言处理在更新系统评价时,有助于快速进行标题和摘要筛选。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 May;133:121-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.010. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
10
Text mining to support abstract screening for knowledge syntheses: a semi-automated workflow.文本挖掘支持知识综合的摘要筛选:一种半自动化工作流程。
Syst Rev. 2021 May 26;10(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01700-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Few-shot learning for medical text: A review of advances, trends, and opportunities.医学文本的少样本学习:进展、趋势和机遇综述。
J Biomed Inform. 2023 Aug;144:104458. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104458. Epub 2023 Jul 23.
2
Efficacy and safety of urate-lowering agents in asymptomatic hyperuricemia: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.降尿酸药物在无症状高尿酸血症中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
BMC Nephrol. 2022 Jun 23;23(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12882-022-02850-3.
3
Causal association pathways between fetuin-A and kidney function: a mediation analysis.胎球蛋白 A 与肾功能之间的因果关联途径:中介分析。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Apr;50(4):3000605221082874. doi: 10.1177/03000605221082874.
4
Prognostic models of diabetic microvascular complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病微血管并发症的预后模型:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 1;10(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01841-z.
5
Efficacy and safety of conventional antiviral agents in preventive strategies for cytomegalovirus infection after kidney transplantation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.常规抗病毒药物在肾移植后巨细胞病毒感染预防策略中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Transpl Int. 2021 Dec;34(12):2720-2734. doi: 10.1111/tri.14122. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
6
Nearly 80 systematic reviews were published each day: Observational study on trends in epidemiology and reporting over the years 2000-2019.每天发表近 80 篇系统评价:2000 年至 2019 年流行病学趋势和报告的观察性研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Oct;138:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.022. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
7
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
8
Evaluation of the cost-utility of phosphate binders as a treatment option for hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the economic evaluations.评价磷结合剂作为慢性肾脏病患者高磷血症治疗选择的成本-效用:经济评价的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Jun;22(4):571-584. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01275-3. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
9
The association between genetic polymorphisms in ABCG2 and SLC2A9 and urate: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.ABCG2 和 SLC2A9 基因多态性与尿酸的关联:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Genet. 2020 Oct 21;21(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12881-020-01147-2.
10
Association Between Vitamin D and Uric Acid in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.成人维生素 D 与尿酸的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Horm Metab Res. 2020 Oct;52(10):732-741. doi: 10.1055/a-1240-5850. Epub 2020 Oct 13.

文献筛选工具的开发与验证:系统评价中的少样本学习方法

Development and Validation of a Literature Screening Tool: Few-Shot Learning Approach in Systematic Reviews.

作者信息

Wiwatthanasetthakarn Phongphat, Ponthongmak Wanchana, Looareesuwan Panu, Tansawet Amarit, Numthavaj Pawin, McKay Gareth J, Attia John, Thakkinstian Ammarin

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Department of Research and Medical Innovation, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 11;26:e56863. doi: 10.2196/56863.

DOI:10.2196/56863
PMID:39662894
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11669879/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Systematic reviews (SRs) are considered the highest level of evidence, but their rigorous literature screening process can be time-consuming and resource-intensive. This is particularly challenging given the rapid pace of medical advancements, which can quickly make SRs outdated. Few-shot learning (FSL), a machine learning approach that learns effectively from limited data, offers a potential solution to streamline this process. Sentence-bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (S-BERT) are particularly promising for identifying relevant studies with fewer examples.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop a model framework using FSL to efficiently screen and select relevant studies for inclusion in SRs, aiming to reduce workload while maintaining high recall rates.

METHODS

We developed and validated the FSL model framework using 9 previously published SR projects (2016-2018). The framework used S-BERT with titles and abstracts as input data. Key evaluation metrics, including workload reduction, cosine similarity score, and the number needed to screen at 100% recall, were estimated to determine the optimal number of eligible studies for model training. A prospective evaluation phase involving 4 ongoing SRs was then conducted. Study selection by FSL and a secondary reviewer were compared with the principal reviewer (considered the gold standard) to estimate the false negative rate.

RESULTS

Model development suggested an optimal range of 4-12 eligible studies for FSL training. Using 4-6 eligible studies during model development resulted in similarity thresholds for 100% recall, ranging from 0.432 to 0.636, corresponding to a workload reduction of 51.11% (95% CI 46.36-55.86) to 97.67% (95% CI 96.76-98.58). The prospective evaluation of 4 SRs aimed for a 50% workload reduction, yielding numbers needed to screen 497 to 1035 out of 995 to 2070 studies. The false negative rate ranged from 1.87% to 12.20% for the FSL model and from 5% to 56.48% for the second reviewer compared with the principal reviewer.

CONCLUSIONS

Our FSL framework demonstrates the potential for reducing workload in SR screening by over 50%. However, the model did not achieve 100% recall at this threshold, highlighting the potential for omitting eligible studies. Future work should focus on developing a web application to implement the FSL framework, making it accessible to researchers.

摘要

背景

系统评价(SRs)被认为是最高级别的证据,但其严格的文献筛选过程可能既耗时又耗费资源。鉴于医学进步的快速步伐,这一挑战尤为突出,因为这可能会迅速使SRs过时。少样本学习(FSL)是一种能从有限数据中有效学习的机器学习方法,为简化这一过程提供了潜在的解决方案。来自变换器的句子双向编码器表示(S-BERT)在以较少示例识别相关研究方面特别有前景。

目的

本研究旨在开发一个使用FSL的模型框架,以有效筛选和选择相关研究纳入SRs,旨在减少工作量同时保持高召回率。

方法

我们使用9个先前发表的SR项目(2016 - 2018年)开发并验证了FSL模型框架。该框架使用S-BERT,将标题和摘要作为输入数据。估计关键评估指标,包括工作量减少、余弦相似度得分以及在100%召回率下需要筛选的数量,以确定模型训练的最佳合格研究数量。然后进行了一个涉及4个正在进行的SRs的前瞻性评估阶段。将FSL和一名二级评审员的研究选择与主要评审员(视为金标准)进行比较,以估计假阴性率。

结果

模型开发表明FSL训练的最佳合格研究数量范围为4 - 12项。在模型开发过程中使用4 - 6项合格研究,在100%召回率下的相似度阈值范围为0.432至0.636,对应工作量减少51.11%(95%CI 46.36 - 55.86)至97.67%(95%CI 96.76 - 98.58)。对4项SRs的前瞻性评估旨在减少50%的工作量,在995至2070项研究中,需要筛选的数量为497至1035项。与主要评审员相比,FSL模型的假阴性率范围为1.87%至12.20%,二级评审员的假阴性率范围为5%至56.48%。

结论

我们的FSL框架显示出在SR筛选中减少超过50%工作量的潜力。然而,在此阈值下该模型未达到100%召回率,这突出了遗漏合格研究的可能性。未来的工作应集中在开发一个网络应用程序来实施FSL框架,以便研究人员能够使用。