Suppr超能文献

关节内注射透明质酸和富血小板血浆作为膝骨关节炎的单一疗法或联合疗法?

Intra-articular hyaluronic acid and platelet-rich plasma as monotherapy or combination therapy in knee osteoarthritis?

作者信息

Oon Sheng-Fei, Lazarakis Smaro, Mallawa Gayani, Nguyen Chau

机构信息

Department of Radiology, ProRAD Medical Imaging, Melbourne, Australia.

Department of Radiology, Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Regen Med. 2024 Dec;19(12):637-644. doi: 10.1080/17460751.2024.2439221. Epub 2024 Dec 11.

Abstract

AIM

To systematically identify best current evidence on intra-articular combination therapy with hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP), compared to monotherapy in knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Using the McMaster University and National Health Service five-step systematic approach, we conducted a bottom-up literature search of all existing evidence through Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and Cochrane (Central - Wiley) from January 2021 to June 2024.

RESULTS

Of 258 articles retrieved, we systematically narrowed best current evidence to one meta-analysis when evaluating combination therapy versus HA alone. This demonstrated superior outcomes with combination therapy against HA only at 3, 6, and 12 months on the visual acuity scale (VAS,  < 0.001), and with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at 12 months in areas of stiffness and physical function ( < 0.001). For combination therapy versus PRP alone, one randomized controlled trial qualified as best current evidence. This demonstrated superior VAS outcomes with combination therapy compared to PRP monotherapy at 6 months ( < 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Best current evidence indicates that intra-articular HA and PRP as combination therapy has superior short and long term symptom control over HA or PRP as monotherapy. Due to the extensive heterogeneity in the studies, results should be interpreted with caution.

摘要

目的

系统地确定与膝关节骨关节炎单一疗法相比,透明质酸(HA)和富血小板血浆(PRP)关节内联合治疗的当前最佳证据。

方法

采用麦克马斯特大学和英国国家医疗服务体系的五步系统方法,我们通过Ovid Medline、Ovid Embase和Cochrane(Central - Wiley)对2021年1月至2024年6月的所有现有证据进行了自下而上的文献检索。

结果

在检索到的258篇文章中,在评估联合治疗与单独使用HA时,我们将当前最佳证据系统地缩小到一项荟萃分析。这表明联合治疗在视力量表(VAS,<0.001)的3、6和12个月时以及在12个月时的西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)的僵硬和身体功能方面优于单独使用HA(<0.001)。对于联合治疗与单独使用PRP,一项随机对照试验符合当前最佳证据标准。这表明联合治疗在6个月时的VAS结果优于PRP单一疗法(<0.02)。

结论

当前最佳证据表明,关节内HA和PRP联合治疗在短期和长期症状控制方面优于HA或PRP单一疗法。由于研究中存在广泛的异质性,结果应谨慎解释。

相似文献

5
Intra-articular corticosteroid for knee osteoarthritis.膝关节骨关节炎的关节内皮质类固醇治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 22;2015(10):CD005328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005328.pub3.

本文引用的文献

3
Conducting umbrella reviews.开展综合性述评。
BMJ Med. 2022 Nov 22;1(1):e000071. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2021-000071. eCollection 2022.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验