• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Intra-articular hyaluronic acid and platelet-rich plasma as monotherapy or combination therapy in knee osteoarthritis?关节内注射透明质酸和富血小板血浆作为膝骨关节炎的单一疗法或联合疗法?
Regen Med. 2024 Dec;19(12):637-644. doi: 10.1080/17460751.2024.2439221. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
2
Intra-articular injections of platelet-rich plasma combined with hyaluronic acid versus platelet-rich plasma alone in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.关节内注射富血小板血浆联合透明质酸与单纯注射富血小板血浆治疗膝关节骨关节炎的系统评价与Meta分析
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Jun 11;35(1):241. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04356-8.
3
Are leukocyte-poor or multiple injections of platelet-rich plasma more effective than hyaluronic acid for knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.白细胞缺乏或多次注射富血小板血浆与透明质酸治疗膝骨关节炎相比哪个更有效?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):3879-3897. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04637-5. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
4
Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid combination therapy for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.富血小板血浆与透明质酸联合治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Sep;144(9):3947-3967. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05442-y. Epub 2024 Jul 7.
5
Intra-articular corticosteroid for knee osteoarthritis.膝关节骨关节炎的关节内皮质类固醇治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 22;2015(10):CD005328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005328.pub3.
6
Relative Efficacy of Intra-articular Injections in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.关节内注射治疗膝骨关节炎的相对疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Sep;50(11):3140-3148. doi: 10.1177/03635465211029659. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
7
The efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review with quantitative synthesis.富血小板血浆治疗症状性膝骨关节炎的疗效:系统评价与定量综合。
Arthroscopy. 2013 Dec;29(12):2037-48. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.09.006.
8
Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid, and PRP and combination therapy for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.糖皮质激素、透明质酸、富血小板血浆及其联合疗法治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Nov 30;24(1):926. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06925-6.
9
Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Hyaluronic Acid for Hip Osteoarthritis Yields Similarly Beneficial Short-Term Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Level I and II Randomized Controlled Trials.富血小板血浆与透明质酸治疗髋骨关节炎短期临床疗效相当:I 级和 II 级随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arthroscopy. 2022 Jun;38(6):2035-2046. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.11.005. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
10
Intra-Articular Injections of Platelet-Rich Plasma, Adipose Mesenchymal Stem Cells, and Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Associated With Better Outcomes Than Hyaluronic Acid and Saline in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.关节内注射富血小板血浆、脂肪间充质干细胞和骨髓间充质干细胞在膝骨关节炎中的疗效优于透明质酸和生理盐水:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Arthroscopy. 2021 Jul;37(7):2298-2314.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.02.045. Epub 2021 Mar 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Knee Osteoarthritis-Current Diagnosis and Treatment Options-A Narrative Review.膝骨关节炎——当前的诊断与治疗选择——一篇叙述性综述
Curr Health Sci J. 2024 Apr-Jun;50(2):163-169. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.50.02.01. Epub 2024 Jun 30.
2
A comparative study of the efficacy of intra-articular injection of different drugs in the treatment of mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis: A network meta-analysis.一种治疗轻中度膝骨关节炎的关节内注射不同药物疗效的比较研究:网络荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Mar 24;102(12):e33339. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033339.
3
Conducting umbrella reviews.开展综合性述评。
BMJ Med. 2022 Nov 22;1(1):e000071. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2021-000071. eCollection 2022.
4
Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma combined with hyaluronic acid versus platelet-rich plasma alone for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.富血小板血浆联合透明质酸与单纯富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Nov 19;17(1):499. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03398-6.
5
Time to Total Knee Arthroplasty after Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid or Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.关节内注射透明质酸或富血小板血浆后行全膝关节置换术的时间:系统文献综述与荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 9;11(14):3985. doi: 10.3390/jcm11143985.
6
A narrative review of the progress in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.膝关节骨关节炎治疗进展的叙述性综述
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Mar;10(6):373. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-818.
7
Comparing the efficacy of dual Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Hyaluronic Acid (HA) therapy with PRP-alone therapy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较双份富血小板血浆(PRP)和透明质酸(HA)联合治疗与单纯PRP治疗在膝关节骨关节炎治疗中的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Exp Orthop. 2021 Nov 4;8(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s40634-021-00415-1.
8
Relative Efficacy of Intra-articular Injections in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.关节内注射治疗膝骨关节炎的相对疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Sep;50(11):3140-3148. doi: 10.1177/03635465211029659. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
9
Treating Knee Osteoarthritis With Platelet-Rich Plasma and Hyaluronic Acid Combination Therapy: A Systematic Review.富血小板血浆与透明质酸联合治疗膝骨关节炎的系统评价。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Jan;50(1):273-281. doi: 10.1177/0363546521998010. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
10
Comparing efficacy of intraarticular single crosslinked Hyaluronan (HYAJOINT Plus) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus PRP alone for treating knee osteoarthritis.比较关节内单次交联透明质酸(HYAJOINT Plus)和富血小板血浆(PRP)与单独 PRP 治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 8;11(1):140. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80333-x.

关节内注射透明质酸和富血小板血浆作为膝骨关节炎的单一疗法或联合疗法?

Intra-articular hyaluronic acid and platelet-rich plasma as monotherapy or combination therapy in knee osteoarthritis?

作者信息

Oon Sheng-Fei, Lazarakis Smaro, Mallawa Gayani, Nguyen Chau

机构信息

Department of Radiology, ProRAD Medical Imaging, Melbourne, Australia.

Department of Radiology, Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Regen Med. 2024 Dec;19(12):637-644. doi: 10.1080/17460751.2024.2439221. Epub 2024 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1080/17460751.2024.2439221
PMID:39663604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11702996/
Abstract

AIM

To systematically identify best current evidence on intra-articular combination therapy with hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP), compared to monotherapy in knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Using the McMaster University and National Health Service five-step systematic approach, we conducted a bottom-up literature search of all existing evidence through Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and Cochrane (Central - Wiley) from January 2021 to June 2024.

RESULTS

Of 258 articles retrieved, we systematically narrowed best current evidence to one meta-analysis when evaluating combination therapy versus HA alone. This demonstrated superior outcomes with combination therapy against HA only at 3, 6, and 12 months on the visual acuity scale (VAS,  < 0.001), and with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at 12 months in areas of stiffness and physical function ( < 0.001). For combination therapy versus PRP alone, one randomized controlled trial qualified as best current evidence. This demonstrated superior VAS outcomes with combination therapy compared to PRP monotherapy at 6 months ( < 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Best current evidence indicates that intra-articular HA and PRP as combination therapy has superior short and long term symptom control over HA or PRP as monotherapy. Due to the extensive heterogeneity in the studies, results should be interpreted with caution.

摘要

目的

系统地确定与膝关节骨关节炎单一疗法相比,透明质酸(HA)和富血小板血浆(PRP)关节内联合治疗的当前最佳证据。

方法

采用麦克马斯特大学和英国国家医疗服务体系的五步系统方法,我们通过Ovid Medline、Ovid Embase和Cochrane(Central - Wiley)对2021年1月至2024年6月的所有现有证据进行了自下而上的文献检索。

结果

在检索到的258篇文章中,在评估联合治疗与单独使用HA时,我们将当前最佳证据系统地缩小到一项荟萃分析。这表明联合治疗在视力量表(VAS,<0.001)的3、6和12个月时以及在12个月时的西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)的僵硬和身体功能方面优于单独使用HA(<0.001)。对于联合治疗与单独使用PRP,一项随机对照试验符合当前最佳证据标准。这表明联合治疗在6个月时的VAS结果优于PRP单一疗法(<0.02)。

结论

当前最佳证据表明,关节内HA和PRP联合治疗在短期和长期症状控制方面优于HA或PRP单一疗法。由于研究中存在广泛的异质性,结果应谨慎解释。