Albaina Aitor, Garić Rade, Yebra Lidia
Department of Zoology and Animal Cell Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU), Barrio Sarriena s/n, 48940 Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain.
Institute for Marine and Coastal Research, University of Dubrovnik, Kneza Damjana Jude 12, 20000 Dubrovnik, Croatia.
J Plankton Res. 2024 Nov 2;46(6):581-595. doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbae057. eCollection 2024 Nov-Dec.
Eleven years after the publication of the first work applying deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) metabarcoding to zooplankton communities, the commonly known "miniCOI" barcode is widely used, becoming the marker of choice. However, several primer combinations co-exist for this barcode and a critical evaluation of their performance is needed. This article reviews the misperformance of miniCOI metabarcoding with marine zooplankton communities, comparing them to microscopy and/or other universal markers. In total, misperformances were reported for 26 zooplankton taxa, including 18 copepods and five tunicates. We report a detection failure with Class Appendicularia and contrasting performances for (from good correspondence to detection failure), two worldwide abundant taxa with a crucial role in the marine pelagic realm. A combination of forward primer mismatches, the presence of long poly-T inserts and a low number of reference sequences would explain the failure to detect appendicularians. However, the contrasting performance with would correspond to distinct numbers of mismatches in the forward primer in different lineages within this cryptic taxon. This is reinforced by the report of similar patterns with other locally abundant zooplankton taxa. Therefore, we strongly call for the use of miniCOI in combination with alternative methods capable of addressing these limitations.
在将脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)宏条形码技术应用于浮游动物群落的首篇研究发表11年后,广为人知的“miniCOI”条形码被广泛使用,成为了首选标记。然而,针对该条形码存在多种引物组合,因此需要对它们的性能进行严格评估。本文回顾了miniCOI宏条形码技术在海洋浮游动物群落中的不佳表现,并将其与显微镜检查和/或其他通用标记进行了比较。总共报告了26种浮游动物类群的不佳表现,其中包括18种桡足类和5种被囊动物。我们报告了尾海鞘纲的检测失败情况,以及(从良好对应到检测失败)两种在全球范围内数量丰富且在海洋中上层领域具有关键作用的类群的对比表现。正向引物错配、长聚T插入序列的存在以及参考序列数量较少的综合情况可以解释未能检测到尾海鞘纲的原因。然而,与的对比表现可能对应于这个隐存类群不同谱系中正向引物错配数量不同。其他当地数量丰富的浮游动物类群也有类似模式报告,这进一步证明了这一点。因此,我们强烈呼吁将miniCOI与能够解决这些局限性的替代方法结合使用。