Weiss N S, Daling J R, Chow W H
Am J Public Health. 1985 Jan;75(1):67-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.1.67.
In case-control studies of ectopic pregnancy, the optimal sampling frame for control selection is influenced heavily by the hypothesis being tested. The selection of women completing an intrauterine pregnancy, a common choice for a control group in studies to date, is appropriate only if the hypothesis does not relate to exposures that selectively prevent an intrauterine pregnancy (e.g., use of an intrauterine device (IUD) at the time of conception). Even for other exposures, the selection of such women can yield misleading results if the exposure is related to the likelihood of completion of the intrauterine pregnancy. On the other hand, the selection of nonpregnant women as controls, while permitting a valid evaluation of the risk associated with exposure such as the use of an IUD, can introduce a substantial degree of incomparability between cases and controls with regard to other contraceptive practices and their correlates. Whichever of the two sampling frames that is chosen, an appreciation of these potential biases can lead to ways of tailoring the selection of individual controls to minimize the magnitude of the bias.
在异位妊娠的病例对照研究中,用于选择对照的最佳抽样框架在很大程度上受所检验假设的影响。选择完成宫内妊娠的女性作为对照组,这是迄今为止研究中常见的选择,只有在所检验假设与选择性阻止宫内妊娠的暴露因素(例如,受孕时使用宫内节育器(IUD))无关时才合适。即使对于其他暴露因素,如果该暴露与宫内妊娠完成的可能性相关,选择这类女性作为对照也可能产生误导性结果。另一方面,选择未怀孕女性作为对照,虽然可以对诸如使用宫内节育器等暴露相关风险进行有效评估,但在其他避孕措施及其相关因素方面,可能会导致病例与对照之间存在很大程度的不可比性。无论选择这两种抽样框架中的哪一种,认识到这些潜在偏差都有助于找到定制个体对照选择的方法,以尽量减少偏差的程度。