Sibley A, Kersten P, Ward C D, White B, Mehta R, George S
School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Clin Rehabil. 2006 Sep;20(9):793-803. doi: 10.1177/0269215506070808.
To evaluate the validity and reliability of an English version of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire (IPA). The original Dutch IPA has been shown to load onto five factors.
A validation study.
Outpatients clinics and people's homes.
Two hundred and thirteen people with multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, spinal cord injury, and general practice attendees, stratified by level of disability (median age 54, 42% male, 58% female).
English as first language, aged 18-75, Mental Status Questionnaire score >6.
Self- and interviewer-administered outcome measures.
IPA, including one new item (66 participants completed the IPA on a second occasion). OTHER MEASURES: Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), London Handicap Scale, three domains of the Functional Limitations Profile (FLP): household management, social integration, emotion.
Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the construct validity of the IPA (Normal Fit Index = 0.98, Comparative Fit Index = 0.99), indicating a good fit to the model. Convergent and discriminant validity were confirmed by the predicted associations, or lack of, with the exception of a poor association between the 'social life/relationships' IPA subscale and FLP-emotion. Internal reliability of the IPA was confirmed (Cronbach alphas >0.8; item-total correlations for all subscales >0.5). Test-retest reliability was confirmed for all items (weighted kappas >0.6) and subscales (intraclass correlation coefficients >0.90).
The English IPA is a valid, reliable and acceptable measure of participation and autonomy in people with a range of conditions and can make a unique and fundamental contribution to outcome assessment. Further research is required to examine the responsiveness of the IPA to change over time, its clinical utility and suitability for use with people from ethnic minorities and with older people.
评估英文版参与和自主功能影响问卷(IPA)的有效性和可靠性。原始的荷兰版IPA已被证明可归为五个因子。
一项效度研究。
门诊诊所和患者家中。
213名患有多发性硬化症、类风湿性关节炎、脊髓损伤的患者以及普通门诊患者,按残疾程度分层(中位年龄54岁,男性占42%,女性占58%)。
以英语为母语,年龄在18 - 75岁之间,精神状态问卷得分>6。
自我填写和由访谈者管理的结局测量。
IPA,包括一个新项目(66名参与者第二次完成了IPA)。其他测量指标:简短健康调查问卷(SF - 36)、伦敦残疾量表、功能受限概况(FLP)的三个领域:家庭管理、社会融入、情绪。
验证性因素分析证实了IPA的结构效度(正态拟合指数=0.98,比较拟合指数=0.99),表明与模型拟合良好。除了“社会生活/人际关系”IPA子量表与FLP - 情绪之间关联较弱外,预测的关联或无关联证实了收敛效度和区分效度。证实了IPA的内部信度(Cronbach系数>0.8;所有子量表的项目 - 总分相关系数>0.5)。所有项目(加权卡帕系数>0.6)和子量表(组内相关系数>0.90)的重测信度得到证实。
英文版IPA是一种有效、可靠且可接受的测量工具,可用于评估一系列疾病患者的参与和自主功能,能为结局评估做出独特且重要的贡献。需要进一步研究来检验IPA随时间变化的反应性、其临床效用以及对少数民族和老年人的适用性。