• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分位数结果自适应套索法:分位数治疗效果逆概率加权估计量的协变量选择

Quantile outcome adaptive lasso: Covariate selection for inverse probability weighting estimator of quantile treatment effects.

作者信息

Shoji Takehiro, Tsuchida Jun, Yadohisa Hiroshi

机构信息

Nikkei Inc., Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Data Science, Kyoto Women's University, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2025 Jan;34(1):69-84. doi: 10.1177/09622802241299410. Epub 2024 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1177/09622802241299410
PMID:39668609
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11800702/
Abstract

When using the propensity score method to estimate the treatment effects, it is important to select the covariates to be included in the propensity score model. The inclusion of covariates unrelated to the outcome in the propensity score model led to bias and large variance in the estimator of treatment effects. Many data-driven covariate selection methods have been proposed for selecting covariates related to outcomes. However, most of them assume an average treatment effect estimation and may not be designed to estimate quantile treatment effects (QTEs), which are the effects of treatment on the quantiles of outcome distribution. In QTE estimation, we consider two relation types with the outcome as the expected value and quantile point. To achieve this, we propose a data-driven covariate selection method for propensity score models that allows for the selection of covariates related to the expected value and quantile of the outcome for QTE estimation. Assuming the quantile regression model as an outcome regression model, covariate selection was performed using a regularization method with the partial regression coefficients of the quantile regression model as weights. The proposed method was applied to artificial data and a dataset of mothers and children born in King County, Washington, to compare the performance of existing methods and QTE estimators. As a result, the proposed method performs well in the presence of covariates related to both the expected value and quantile of the outcome.

摘要

在使用倾向得分法估计治疗效果时,选择纳入倾向得分模型的协变量非常重要。在倾向得分模型中纳入与结果无关的协变量会导致治疗效果估计量出现偏差和较大方差。已经提出了许多数据驱动的协变量选择方法来选择与结果相关的协变量。然而,它们中的大多数都假设进行平均治疗效果估计,可能并非设计用于估计分位数治疗效果(QTE),即治疗对结果分布分位数的影响。在QTE估计中,我们考虑与结果的两种关系类型,即期望值和分位数点。为实现这一点,我们提出了一种用于倾向得分模型的数据驱动协变量选择方法,该方法允许选择与结果的期望值和分位数相关的协变量以进行QTE估计。假设分位数回归模型为结果回归模型,使用一种正则化方法进行协变量选择,以分位数回归模型的偏回归系数作为权重。将所提出的方法应用于人工数据以及华盛顿州金县出生的母婴数据集,以比较现有方法和QTE估计量的性能。结果表明,在所提出的方法在存在与结果的期望值和分位数都相关的协变量的情况下表现良好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caad/11800702/f72419f98f2e/10.1177_09622802241299410-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caad/11800702/32892436c2d1/10.1177_09622802241299410-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caad/11800702/f915029dab43/10.1177_09622802241299410-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caad/11800702/5d335bbe19f1/10.1177_09622802241299410-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caad/11800702/b5490f765213/10.1177_09622802241299410-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caad/11800702/f72419f98f2e/10.1177_09622802241299410-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caad/11800702/32892436c2d1/10.1177_09622802241299410-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caad/11800702/f915029dab43/10.1177_09622802241299410-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caad/11800702/5d335bbe19f1/10.1177_09622802241299410-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caad/11800702/b5490f765213/10.1177_09622802241299410-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/caad/11800702/f72419f98f2e/10.1177_09622802241299410-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantile outcome adaptive lasso: Covariate selection for inverse probability weighting estimator of quantile treatment effects.分位数结果自适应套索法:分位数治疗效果逆概率加权估计量的协变量选择
Stat Methods Med Res. 2025 Jan;34(1):69-84. doi: 10.1177/09622802241299410. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
2
Multiply robust estimation of causal quantile treatment effects.因果分位数治疗效果的多重稳健估计
Stat Med. 2020 Dec 10;39(28):4238-4251. doi: 10.1002/sim.8722. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
3
Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.模型误设定和平均因果效应逆概率加权估计的偏差。
Biom J. 2023 Feb;65(2):e2100118. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202100118. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
4
Outcome-adaptive lasso: Variable selection for causal inference.结果自适应套索:用于因果推断的变量选择
Biometrics. 2017 Dec;73(4):1111-1122. doi: 10.1111/biom.12679. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
5
Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?倾向评分分析与部分观测协变量:应如何使用多重插补?
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Jan;28(1):3-19. doi: 10.1177/0962280217713032. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
6
Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.利用结合倾向评分分层和加权的双重稳健估计器改进因果推断。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;23(4):697-702. doi: 10.1111/jep.12714. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
7
Targeted estimation of nuisance parameters to obtain valid statistical inference.对干扰参数进行有针对性的估计以获得有效的统计推断。
Int J Biostat. 2014;10(1):29-57. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2012-0038.
8
Collaborative-controlled LASSO for constructing propensity score-based estimators in high-dimensional data.基于协作控制 LASSO 的高维数据倾向评分匹配估计量的构建
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Apr;28(4):1044-1063. doi: 10.1177/0962280217744588. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
9
An evaluation of inverse probability weighting using the propensity score for baseline covariate adjustment in smaller population randomised controlled trials with a continuous outcome.评价在较小人群随机对照试验中使用倾向评分进行基线协变量调整的逆概率加权法,该试验的结局变量为连续型变量。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Mar 23;20(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00947-7.
10
On variance estimation of the inverse probability-of-treatment weighting estimator: A tutorial for different types of propensity score weights.逆处理概率加权估计量的方差估计:不同类型倾向评分权重的教程。
Stat Med. 2024 Jun 15;43(13):2672-2694. doi: 10.1002/sim.10078. Epub 2024 Apr 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Multiply robust estimation of causal quantile treatment effects.因果分位数治疗效果的多重稳健估计
Stat Med. 2020 Dec 10;39(28):4238-4251. doi: 10.1002/sim.8722. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
2
How to obtain valid tests and confidence intervals after propensity score variable selection?在倾向得分变量选择后如何获得有效的检验和置信区间?
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Mar;29(3):677-694. doi: 10.1177/0962280219862005. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
3
Covariate selection with group lasso and doubly robust estimation of causal effects.使用组套索进行协变量选择以及因果效应的双重稳健估计。
Biometrics. 2018 Mar;74(1):8-17. doi: 10.1111/biom.12736. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
4
Outcome-adaptive lasso: Variable selection for causal inference.结果自适应套索:用于因果推断的变量选择
Biometrics. 2017 Dec;73(4):1111-1122. doi: 10.1111/biom.12679. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
5
Causal inference on quantiles with an obstetric application.具有产科应用的分位数因果推断
Biometrics. 2012 Sep;68(3):697-706. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01712.x. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
6
On model selection and model misspecification in causal inference.在因果推断中的模型选择和模型误设定。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2012 Feb;21(1):7-30. doi: 10.1177/0962280210387717. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
7
Invited commentary: variable selection versus shrinkage in the control of multiple confounders.特邀评论:在控制多个混杂因素时的变量选择与收缩法
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Mar 1;167(5):523-9; discussion 530-1. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm355. Epub 2008 Jan 27.
8
Variable selection for propensity score models.倾向得分模型的变量选择
Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Jun 15;163(12):1149-56. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj149. Epub 2006 Apr 19.
9
Maternal cigarette smoking, metabolic gene polymorphism, and infant birth weight.母亲吸烟、代谢基因多态性与婴儿出生体重。
JAMA. 2002 Jan 9;287(2):195-202. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.2.195.
10
Effects on birth weight of smoking, alcohol, caffeine, socioeconomic factors, and psychosocial stress.吸烟、饮酒、咖啡因、社会经济因素及心理社会压力对出生体重的影响。
BMJ. 1989 Mar 25;298(6676):795-801. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6676.795.