Abaci Kadir, Yetgin Zeki, Yamacli Volkan, Isiker Hakan
Electrical & Electronics Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mersin University, P.O. Box 33343, Mersin, Turkey.
Computer Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mersin University, P.O. Box 33343, Mersin, Turkey.
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 16;10(12):e32862. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32862. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
The optimal power flow (OPF) problem remains a popular and challenging work in optimizing power systems. Although researchers have suggested many optimization algorithms to solve this problem in the literature, their comparison studies lack fairness and transparency. As these studies increase in number, they deviate from a standard test system, considering a common security and technical constraints., there is a growing trend away from a standard test system. Different studies used different search ranges for the same decision and constraint parameters, different than the standard ranges suggested by IEEE systems. This caused many unfair comparisons in literature. Furthermore, these studies are generally not transparent enough so that their results cannot be verified. This has resulted in numerous infeasible solutions in the literature, violating the limits of constraint parameters. The recent incorporating of renewable energy sources in OPF studies has made this situation more complicated. Sorting through the literature and identifying those OPF applications having exactly the same test conditions is a challenging process. The main contribution is this paper adapts the modified effective butterfly algorithm (MEBO) to solve OPF problem under the common parameter constraints and sufficient transparency. The focus is on a transparent comparison with works in the literature with the same constraint values. This paper compares the performance of the proposed algorithm with other state-of-the-art algorithms in the literature, focusing on the wind energy and without wind energy IEEE 30-bus and IEEE 57-bus systems and the most commonly used constraints. The results demonstrate the efficiency and superiority of the proposed algorithm. For instance, in the 30-bus test system, compared to the initial case, fuel cost has been reduced by 11.42 %, emission by 14.33 %, L-index by 45.10 %, active power losses by 51.60 %, and voltage deviation by 92.70 %.
最优潮流(OPF)问题在电力系统优化中仍然是一项热门且具有挑战性的工作。尽管研究人员在文献中提出了许多优化算法来解决这个问题,但他们的比较研究缺乏公平性和透明度。随着这些研究数量的增加,它们偏离了标准测试系统,没有考虑常见的安全和技术约束。而且,越来越有偏离标准测试系统的趋势。不同的研究对相同的决策和约束参数使用了不同的搜索范围,这与IEEE系统建议的标准范围不同。这在文献中造成了许多不公平的比较。此外,这些研究通常不够透明,以至于其结果无法得到验证。这导致文献中出现了许多不可行的解决方案,违反了约束参数的限制。最近在OPF研究中纳入可再生能源使这种情况更加复杂。梳理文献并识别那些具有完全相同测试条件的OPF应用是一个具有挑战性的过程。本文的主要贡献是采用改进的有效蝴蝶算法(MEBO)在常见参数约束和足够透明度的情况下解决OPF问题。重点是与文献中具有相同约束值的工作进行透明比较。本文将所提出算法的性能与文献中其他最先进的算法进行了比较,重点关注有无风能的IEEE 30节点和IEEE 57节点系统以及最常用的约束条件。结果证明了所提出算法的效率和优越性。例如,在30节点测试系统中,与初始情况相比,燃料成本降低了11.42%,排放量降低了14.33%,L指数降低了45.10%,有功功率损耗降低了51.60%,电压偏差降低了92.70%。