Engelholm S A, Spang-Thomsen M, Brünner N, Nøhr I, Vindeløv L L
Br J Cancer. 1985 Jan;51(1):93-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1985.13.
Two combined mechanical and enzymatic disaggregation techniques and a simple mechanical disaggregation procedure were compared. The combined procedures involved a mechanical comminution of the tumour tissue followed by incubation in trypsin. In one method, the tissue was subjected to long-term trypsinization at 4 degrees C, and in the other procedure, repeated short-term trypsinization at 37 degrees C was applied. The results were compared in terms of the yield of viable cells, plating efficiency, the ability to produce tumours in nude mice, and DNA distribution as measured by flow cytometry. The combined techniques provided reproducible cell yields of 2-10 X 10(7) viable cells g-1 of tissue, whereas only a small number of tumour cells was produced by the mechanical method. DNA analysis demonstrated that only the long-term trypsinization procedure resulted in a representative cell yield from all the tumours tested.
比较了两种机械和酶解相结合的技术以及一种简单的机械解聚程序。这两种结合程序包括先对肿瘤组织进行机械粉碎,然后在胰蛋白酶中孵育。在一种方法中,组织在4℃下进行长期胰蛋白酶处理,在另一种程序中,则采用在37℃下重复短期胰蛋白酶处理。从活细胞产量、接种效率、在裸鼠体内产生肿瘤的能力以及通过流式细胞术测量的DNA分布等方面对结果进行了比较。这两种结合技术可重复产生2 - 10×10⁷个活细胞/克组织的产量,而机械方法仅产生少量肿瘤细胞。DNA分析表明,只有长期胰蛋白酶处理程序能从所有测试肿瘤中获得具有代表性的细胞产量。