• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自非转基因菌株HBI-TX01的食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶的安全性评估。

Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from the non-genetically modified strain HBI-TX01.

作者信息

Zorn Holger, Barat Baviera José Manuel, Bolognesi Claudia, Catania Francesco, Gadermaier Gabriele, Greiner Ralf, Mayo Baltasar, Mortensen Alicja, Roos Yrjö Henrik, Solano Marize L M, Sramkova Monika, Van Loveren Henk, Vernis Laurence, Liu Yi, Criado Ana, Apergi Kyriaki, Andryszkiewicz Magdalena, Cavanna Daniele, Marini Eleonora

出版信息

EFSA J. 2024 Dec 12;22(12):e9127. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9127. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9127
PMID:39670061
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11635306/
Abstract

The food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase (4-β-d-xylan xylanohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.8) is produced with strain HBI-TX01 by HBI Enzymes Inc. The food enzyme is free from viable cells of the production organism. It is intended to be used in four food manufacturing processes. Since residual amounts of food enzyme-total organic solids (TOS) are removed in two food manufacturing processes, dietary exposure was calculated only for the remaining two processes. It was estimated to be up to 1.488 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests did not indicate a safety concern. The systemic toxicity was assessed by means of a repeated dose 90-day oral toxicity study in rats. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of 1101 mg TOS/kg bw, the highest dose tested, which when compared with the estimated dietary exposure, resulted in a margin of exposure of at least 740. A search for homology of the amino acid sequence of the food enzyme to known allergens was made and no match was found. Known sources of food allergens were used in the manufacturing process. The Panel considered that the risk of allergic reactions upon dietary exposure to this food enzyme cannot be excluded, but the likelihood is low. Based on the data provided, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns, under the intended conditions of use.

摘要

食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶(4-β-D-木聚糖木聚糖水解酶;EC 3.2.1.8)由HBI酶业公司的HBI-TX01菌株生产。该食品酶不含生产生物体的活细胞。它拟用于四种食品制造工艺。由于在两种食品制造工艺中可去除食品酶总有机固体(TOS)的残留量,因此仅针对其余两种工艺计算膳食暴露量。据估计,欧洲人群的膳食暴露量高达每天1.488毫克TOS/千克体重(bw)。遗传毒性试验未表明存在安全问题。通过对大鼠进行的重复剂量90天口服毒性研究评估全身毒性。专家小组确定未观察到有害作用水平为1101毫克TOS/千克bw,这是测试的最高剂量,与估计的膳食暴露量相比,得出的暴露边际至少为740。对该食品酶的氨基酸序列与已知过敏原进行了同源性搜索,未发现匹配项。制造过程中使用了已知的食品过敏原来源。专家小组认为,不能排除膳食接触这种食品酶后发生过敏反应的风险,但可能性较低。根据提供的数据,专家小组得出结论,在预期的使用条件下,这种食品酶不会引起安全问题。

相似文献

1
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from the non-genetically modified strain HBI-TX01.来自非转基因菌株HBI-TX01的食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2024 Dec 12;22(12):e9127. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9127. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Updated safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from the genetically modified strain XYL.来自转基因菌株XYL的食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶的安全性评估更新
EFSA J. 2025 Mar 19;23(3):e9292. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9292. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from the genetically modified strain NZYM-ER.来自转基因菌株NZYM-ER的食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶的安全性评估
EFSA J. 2022 Jun 13;20(6):e07373. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7373. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from the non-genetically modified strain 278.来自非转基因菌株278的食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Nov 29;21(11):e8399. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8399. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme containing cellulase, endo-1,3(4)-β-glucanase and endo-1,4-β-xylanase activities from the non-genetically modified strain AR-256.来自非转基因菌株AR-256的含有纤维素酶、内切-1,3(4)-β-葡聚糖酶和内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶活性的食品酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2022 Dec 9;20(12):e07676. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7676. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from the genetically modified strain RF5427.来自转基因菌株RF5427的食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2020 Jun 3;18(6):e06127. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6127. eCollection 2020 Jun.
7
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme cellulose 1,4-β-cellobiosidase (non-reducing end) from the non-genetically modified strain C1-5-2.来自非转基因菌株C1-5-2的食品酶纤维素1,4-β-纤维二糖水解酶(非还原端)的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2025 Apr 4;23(4):e9333. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9333. eCollection 2025 Apr.
8
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from the non-genetically modified strain LYX.来自非转基因菌株LYX的食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2023 Jul 12;21(7):e08085. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8085. eCollection 2023 Jul.
9
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from a genetically modified (strain NZYM-CE).来自转基因(菌株NZYM-CE)的食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2019 Apr 30;17(4):e05685. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5685. eCollection 2019 Apr.
10
Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-1,4-β-xylanase from a genetically modified (strain DP-Nzd22).来自转基因(菌株DP-Nzd22)的食品酶内切-1,4-β-木聚糖酶的安全性评估。
EFSA J. 2018 Nov 30;16(11):e05479. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5479. eCollection 2018 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Food manufacturing processes and technical data used in the exposure assessment of food enzymes.食品酶暴露评估中使用的食品制造工艺和技术数据。
EFSA J. 2023 Jul 25;21(7):e08094. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8094. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Scientific Guidance for the submission of dossiers on Food Enzymes.食品酶制剂资料提交的科学指南。
EFSA J. 2021 Oct 21;19(10):e06851. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6851. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Characterisation of microorganisms used for the production of food enzymes.用于食品酶生产的微生物的特性描述。
EFSA J. 2019 Jun 11;17(6):e05741. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5741. eCollection 2019 Jun.
4
Safety of the fungal workhorses of industrial biotechnology: update on the mycotoxin and secondary metabolite potential of Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus oryzae, and Trichoderma reesei.工业生物技术中真菌“工作伙伴”的安全性:黑曲霉、米曲霉和里氏木霉的真菌毒素和次生代谢产物潜力的最新研究进展。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018 Nov;102(22):9481-9515. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9354-1. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
5
Why can patients with baker's asthma tolerate wheat flour ingestion? Is wheat pollen allergy relevant?为什么患面包师哮喘的患者能耐受摄入小麦粉?小麦花粉过敏与之有关吗?
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2009 Jul-Aug;37(4):203-4. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2009.05.001. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
6
Allergy assessment of foods or ingredients derived from biotechnology, gene-modified organisms, or novel foods.对源自生物技术、基因改造生物或新型食品的食品或成分进行过敏评估。
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2004 Nov;48(6):413-23. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200400029.
7
Prevalence of sensitisation to cellulase and xylanase in bakery workers.面包店工人对纤维素酶和木聚糖酶的致敏率
Occup Environ Med. 2003 Oct;60(10):802-4. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.10.802.
8
Baker's asthma due to xylanase and cellulase without sensitization to alpha-amylase and only weak sensitization to flour.由木聚糖酶和纤维素酶引起的贝克哮喘,对α淀粉酶无致敏反应,仅对面粉有微弱致敏反应。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2001 Apr;124(4):502-5. doi: 10.1159/000053786.
9
Clinical responses to ingested fungal alpha-amylase and hemicellulase in persons sensitized to Aspergillus fumigatus?对烟曲霉致敏者摄入真菌α-淀粉酶和半纤维素酶后的临床反应?
Allergy. 1997 Mar;52(3):346-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1997.tb01003.x.
10
Allergic reaction after eating alpha-amylase (Asp o 2)-containing bread. A case report.食用含α-淀粉酶(Asp o 2)面包后发生过敏反应。病例报告。
Allergy. 1995 Jan;50(1):85-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1995.tb02487.x.