• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会杠杆效应:制度将微弱的声誉效应转化为强大的合作激励。

The social leverage effect: Institutions transform weak reputation effects into strong incentives for cooperation.

作者信息

Lie-Panis Julien, Fitouchi Léo, Baumard Nicolas, André Jean-Baptiste

机构信息

Max Planck Research Group Dynamics of Social Behavior, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, 24306 Plön, Germany.

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Institute for Advanced Studies in Toulouse, Toulouse School of Economics, University of Toulouse Capitole, 31080 Toulouse, France.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Dec 17;121(51):e2408802121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2408802121. Epub 2024 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2408802121
PMID:39671186
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11665857/
Abstract

Institutions allow cooperation to persist when reciprocity and reputation provide insufficient incentives. Yet how they do so remains unclear, especially given that institutions are themselves a form of cooperation. To solve this puzzle, we develop a mathematical model of reputation-based cooperation in which two social dilemmas are nested within one another. The first dilemma, characterized by high individual costs or insufficient monitoring, cannot be solved by reputation alone. The second dilemma, an institutional collective action, involves individuals contributing to change the parameters of the first dilemma in a way that incentivizes cooperation. Our model demonstrates that this nested architecture creates a leverage effect. While insufficient on its own to incentivize cooperation in the first dilemma, reputation incentivizes contributions to the institutional collective action, which, in turn, strengthen the initially weak incentives for cooperation in the first dilemma. Just as a pulley system transforms minimal muscular strength into significant lifting capability, institutions act as cooperative pulleys, transforming initially weak reputational incentives into powerful drivers of cooperative behavior. Based on these results, we suggest that institutions have developed as social technologies, designed by humans to exploit this social leverage effect, just as material technologies are designed to exploit physical laws.

摘要

当互惠和声誉提供的激励不足时,制度能使合作持续下去。然而,它们是如何做到这一点的仍不清楚,尤其是考虑到制度本身就是一种合作形式。为了解决这个难题,我们建立了一个基于声誉的合作数学模型,其中两个社会困境相互嵌套。第一个困境的特点是个人成本高或监督不足,仅靠声誉无法解决。第二个困境是制度性集体行动,涉及个人做出贡献以改变第一个困境的参数,从而激励合作。我们的模型表明,这种嵌套结构产生了一种杠杆效应。虽然声誉本身不足以激励在第一个困境中的合作,但它激励了对制度性集体行动的贡献,而这反过来又加强了最初在第一个困境中对合作的微弱激励。就像滑轮系统将最小的肌肉力量转化为强大的提升能力一样,制度就像合作的滑轮,将最初微弱的声誉激励转化为合作行为的强大驱动力。基于这些结果,我们认为制度是作为社会技术发展起来的,是人类为了利用这种社会杠杆效应而设计的,就像物质技术是为了利用物理定律而设计的一样。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ea/11665857/231b29454e79/pnas.2408802121fig07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ea/11665857/7fd1879414f5/pnas.2408802121fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ea/11665857/3a3cc8501de6/pnas.2408802121fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ea/11665857/594aa3f30d5a/pnas.2408802121fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ea/11665857/44f0c385f34d/pnas.2408802121fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ea/11665857/38b7aaf0f046/pnas.2408802121fig05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ea/11665857/0ef9c770e2a8/pnas.2408802121fig06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ea/11665857/231b29454e79/pnas.2408802121fig07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ea/11665857/7fd1879414f5/pnas.2408802121fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ea/11665857/3a3cc8501de6/pnas.2408802121fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ea/11665857/594aa3f30d5a/pnas.2408802121fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ea/11665857/44f0c385f34d/pnas.2408802121fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ea/11665857/38b7aaf0f046/pnas.2408802121fig05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ea/11665857/0ef9c770e2a8/pnas.2408802121fig06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ea/11665857/231b29454e79/pnas.2408802121fig07.jpg

相似文献

1
The social leverage effect: Institutions transform weak reputation effects into strong incentives for cooperation.社会杠杆效应:制度将微弱的声誉效应转化为强大的合作激励。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Dec 17;121(51):e2408802121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2408802121. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
2
Inferring reputation promotes the evolution of cooperation in spatial social dilemma games.推断声誉促进空间社会困境博弈中的合作进化。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040218. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
3
Indirect reciprocity undermines indirect reciprocity destabilizing large-scale cooperation.间接互惠破坏间接互惠,破坏大规模合作的稳定性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 May 7;121(19):e2322072121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2322072121. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
4
The leading eight: social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity.排名前八位的:能够通过间接互惠维持合作的社会规范。
J Theor Biol. 2006 Apr 21;239(4):435-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.08.008. Epub 2005 Sep 19.
5
Coevolution of trustful buyers and cooperative sellers in the trust game.信任博弈中信任买家和合作卖家的共同进化。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044169. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
6
Two ways to overcome the three social dilemmas of indirect reciprocity.克服间接互惠的三个社会困境的两种方法。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 8;10(1):16799. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73564-5.
7
A second-order stability analysis for the continuous model of indirect reciprocity.二阶稳定性分析间接互惠连续模型。
J Theor Biol. 2022 Sep 7;548:111202. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111202. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
8
A pull versus push framework for reputation.声誉的拉推框架。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Sep;27(9):852-866. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.06.005. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
9
The complexity of human cooperation under indirect reciprocity.间接互惠下人类合作的复杂性。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200291. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0291. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
10
The effects of reputation on inequality in network cooperation games.声誉对网络合作博弈中不平等的影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200299. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0299. Epub 2021 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Profitable third-party punishment destabilizes cooperation.有利可图的第三方惩罚会破坏合作。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Aug 26;122(34):e2508479122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2508479122. Epub 2025 Aug 19.
2
Institutions of public judgment established by social contract and taxation.通过社会契约和税收建立的公共评判机构。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul;122(26):e2506537122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2506537122. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
3
Self-organized institutions in evolutionary dynamical-systems games.进化动力系统博弈中的自组织机构

本文引用的文献

1
Can institutions foster cooperation by wealth redistribution?机构能否通过财富再分配来促进合作?
J R Soc Interface. 2024 Mar;21(212):20230698. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0698. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
2
The Effect of Income and Wealth on Behavioral Strategies, Personality Traits, and Preferences.收入和财富对行为策略、人格特质及偏好的影响。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2025 Jul;20(4):669-690. doi: 10.1177/17456916231201512. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
3
Peace is a form of cooperation, and so are the cultural technologies which make peace possible.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Apr 15;122(15):e2500960122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2500960122. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
和平是一种合作形式,使和平成为可能的文化技术也是如此。
Behav Brain Sci. 2024 Jan 15;47:e16. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X23002601.
4
Four levers of reciprocity across human societies: concepts, analysis and predictions.人类社会中互惠的四个杠杆:概念、分析与预测。
Evol Hum Sci. 2022 Feb 21;4:e11. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2022.7. eCollection 2022.
5
A pull versus push framework for reputation.声誉的拉推框架。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Sep;27(9):852-866. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.06.005. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
6
Corrupt third parties undermine trust and prosocial behaviour between people.腐败的第三方会破坏人与人之间的信任和亲社会行为。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Jan;7(1):46-54. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01457-w. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
7
Reputation effects drive the joint evolution of cooperation and social rewarding.声誉效应对合作与社会奖励的共同进化有驱动作用。
Nat Commun. 2022 Oct 7;13(1):5928. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33551-y.
8
Cooperation as a signal of time preferences.合作作为时间偏好的信号。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Apr 27;289(1973):20212266. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2266.
9
Cooperating to show that you care: costly helping as an honest signal of fitness interdependence.合作以示关心:昂贵的帮助是健康相互依存的诚实信号。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200292. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0292. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
10
The benefits of being seen to help others: indirect reciprocity and reputation-based partner choice.被视为帮助他人的好处:间接互惠和基于声誉的伴侣选择。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200290. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0290. Epub 2021 Oct 4.