Informatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, Amsterdam 1098XH, The Netherlands.
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, USA.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200291. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0291. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
Indirect reciprocity (IR) is a key mechanism to understand cooperation among unrelated individuals. It involves reputations and complex information processing, arising from social interactions. By helping someone, individuals may improve their reputation, which may be shared in a population and change the predisposition of others to reciprocate in the future. The reputation of individuals depends, in turn, on social norms that define a good or bad action, offering a computational and mathematical appealing way of studying the evolution of moral systems. Over the years, theoretical and empirical research has unveiled many features of cooperation under IR, exploring norms with varying degrees of complexity and information requirements. Recent results suggest that costly reputation spread, interaction observability and empathy are determinants of cooperation under IR. Importantly, such characteristics probably impact the level of complexity and information requirements for IR to sustain cooperation. In this review, we present and discuss those recent results. We provide a synthesis of theoretical models and discuss previous conclusions through the lens of evolutionary game theory and cognitive complexity. We highlight open questions and suggest future research in this domain. This article is part of the theme issue 'The language of cooperation: reputation and honest signalling'.
间接互惠(IR)是理解无关个体之间合作的关键机制。它涉及声誉和复杂的信息处理,源于社会互动。通过帮助他人,个体可以提高自己的声誉,这种声誉可能在人群中传播,并改变其他人未来互惠的倾向。个体的声誉反过来又取决于社会规范,这些规范定义了好的或坏的行为,为研究道德体系的进化提供了一种计算和数学上吸引人的方法。多年来,理论和实证研究揭示了 IR 下合作的许多特征,探索了具有不同复杂程度和信息要求的规范。最近的结果表明,昂贵的声誉传播、交互可观察性和同理心是 IR 下合作的决定因素。重要的是,这些特征可能会影响 IR 维持合作所需的复杂程度和信息要求。在这篇综述中,我们介绍和讨论了这些最新的结果。我们通过进化博弈论和认知复杂性的视角,对理论模型进行了综合,并对以前的结论进行了讨论。我们强调了该领域的开放性问题,并提出了未来的研究建议。本文是主题为“合作的语言:声誉和诚实信号”特刊的一部分。