• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于初级保健的数字健康赋能中风管理干预:一项整群随机临床试验的长期随访

Primary Care-Based Digital Health-Enabled Stroke Management Intervention: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Tan Jie, Gong Enying, Gallis John A, Sun Shifeng, Chen Xingxing, Turner Elizabeth L, Luo Siran, Duan Jingying, Li Zixiao, Wang Yilong, Yang Bolu, Lu Shiyu, Tang Shenglan, Bettger Janet P, Oldenburg Brian, Miranda J Jaime, Karmacharya Biraj, Kinra Sanjay, Shao Ruitai, Ebrahim Shah, Yan Lijing L

机构信息

School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

Global Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, China.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2449561. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.49561.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.49561
PMID:39671199
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11645652/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Despite evidence of the short-term benefits of multicomponent primary care-based interventions, their long-term effects are unproven.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of a system-integrated technology-enabled model of care (SINEMA intervention) for stroke management for systolic blood pressure (BP) and other outcomes among patients with stroke in China.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This long-term follow-up included community-dwelling clinically stable surviving participants with stroke in an open-label cluster randomized clinical trial. Of 218 villages from Nanhe County in Hebei, China, an area with suboptimal health care resources and stroke prevalence doubling the national average, 50 villages (clusters) were recruited between June 23 and July 29, 2017, and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to an intervention or a control arm (usual care). The intervention lasted 1 year (to July 31, 2018), with a posttrial observational follow-up conducted from October 1, 2022, to August 27, 2023.

INTERVENTIONS

Village doctors were provided with training, performance-based incentives, technical support, and customized mobile health tools to deliver monthly follow-up to patients. Patients also received daily voice messages emphasizing medication adherence and physical activity. No intervention was requested or supported during the posttrial period.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Between-arm differences in intention-to-treat analyses of individual-level changes from baseline to long-term posttrial in systolic BP (primary outcome) and stroke recurrence, diastolic BP, BP control, antihypertensive medication use and regimen adherence, and disability (secondary outcomes).

RESULTS

Among a total of 1042 stroke survivors, 44 (4.2%) were lost to follow-up and 998 (mean [SD] age at baseline: 65.0 [8.2] years; 544 [54.4%] men) completed posttrial assessment at a mean (SD) period of 66.6 (3.7) months (5.5 years) after baseline. The multicomponent intervention was associated with an estimated between-arm net reduction in systolic BP of -2.8 (95% CI, -5.3 to -0.3) mm Hg (P = .03). Most secondary outcomes showed a tendency toward lasting effects, with a notable absolute net reduction of 6.0 (95% CI, -11.3 to -0.7) percentage points and risk ratio of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.61-0.99) for stroke recurrence. In subgroup analyses, significant between-arm differences were observed among women and people with lower educational attainment, lower income, and higher use of and adherence to medications.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this long-term follow-up of a cluster randomized clinical trial, the 1-year intervention was associated with significantly reduced systolic BP and stroke recurrence at 5.5 years, providing evidence of long-term health and inequity-reducing benefits and holding promise for scaling up of the intervention in resource-limited settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05792618.

摘要

重要性

尽管有证据表明基于多组分初级保健的干预措施具有短期益处,但其长期效果尚未得到证实。

目的

评估一种系统整合的、基于技术的护理模式(SINEMA干预)对中国卒中患者收缩压(BP)及其他结局的长期影响。

设计、设置和参与者:这项长期随访纳入了一项开放标签整群随机临床试验中社区居住的临床稳定的卒中存活参与者。在中国河北省南和县的218个村庄中,该地区医疗资源欠佳且卒中患病率是全国平均水平的两倍,于2017年6月23日至7月29日招募了50个村庄(群组),并按1:1的比例随机分为干预组或对照组(常规护理)。干预持续1年(至2018年7月31日),并于2022年10月1日至2023年8月27日进行试验后观察性随访。

干预措施

为乡村医生提供培训、基于绩效的激励措施、技术支持和定制的移动健康工具,以便每月对患者进行随访。患者还会收到强调药物依从性和身体活动的每日语音信息。试验后期间不要求或支持任何干预措施。

主要结局和测量指标

在从基线到试验后长期的个体水平变化的意向性分析中,收缩压(主要结局)、卒中复发、舒张压、血压控制、降压药物使用和方案依从性以及残疾(次要结局)的组间差异。

结果

在总共1042名卒中幸存者中,44名(4.2%)失访,998名(基线时平均[标准差]年龄:65.0[8.2]岁;544名[54.4%]为男性)在基线后平均(标准差)66.6(3.7)个月(5.5年)时完成试验后评估。多组分干预与收缩压组间估计净降低-2.8(95%CI,-5.3至-0.3)mmHg相关(P = 0.03)。大多数次要结局显示出持续效应的趋势,卒中复发的绝对净降低显著为6.0(95%CI,-11.3至-0.7)个百分点,风险比为0.77(95%CI,0.61 - 0.99)。在亚组分析中,在女性以及教育程度较低、收入较低、药物使用和依从性较高的人群中观察到显著的组间差异。

结论和相关性

在这项整群随机临床试验的长期随访中,1年的干预与5.5年时收缩压显著降低和卒中复发减少相关,为长期健康和减少不平等效益提供了证据,并有望在资源有限的环境中扩大干预规模。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05792618。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d06/11645652/5324ec1b829e/jamanetwopen-e2449561-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d06/11645652/044d1a9a1383/jamanetwopen-e2449561-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d06/11645652/7ed352acf933/jamanetwopen-e2449561-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d06/11645652/5324ec1b829e/jamanetwopen-e2449561-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d06/11645652/044d1a9a1383/jamanetwopen-e2449561-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d06/11645652/7ed352acf933/jamanetwopen-e2449561-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d06/11645652/5324ec1b829e/jamanetwopen-e2449561-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Primary Care-Based Digital Health-Enabled Stroke Management Intervention: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.基于初级保健的数字健康赋能中风管理干预:一项整群随机临床试验的长期随访
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2449561. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.49561.
2
Long-term mortality outcome of a primary care-based mobile health intervention for stroke management: Six-year follow-up of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.一项基于初级保健的中风管理移动健康干预措施的长期死亡率结果:一项整群随机对照试验的六年随访
PLoS Med. 2025 Mar 27;22(3):e1004564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004564. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Emergency Department-Based Education and mHealth Empowerment Intervention for Hypertension: The TOUCHED Randomized Clinical Trial.基于急诊科的高血压教育与移动健康赋权干预:TOUCHED随机临床试验
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2025.0675.
4
Mobile phone-based interventions for improving adherence to medication prescribed for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults.基于手机的干预措施,用于提高成年人心血管疾病一级预防中所开药物的依从性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 22;6(6):CD012675. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012675.pub2.
5
Mobile phone text messaging for medication adherence in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.手机短信用于心血管疾病二级预防中的药物依从性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 27;3(3):CD011851. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011851.pub3.
6
Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases.用于心血管疾病一级和二级预防的饮食预防高血压(DASH)方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 6;5(5):CD013729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013729.pub2.
7
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
8
Psychological therapies for women who experience intimate partner violence.针对遭受亲密伴侣暴力的女性的心理疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 1;7(7):CD013017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013017.pub2.
9
Safety and efficacy of repeat ivermectin mass drug administrations for malaria control (RIMDAMAL II): a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cluster-randomised, parallel-group trial.重复使用伊维菌素进行疟疾控制的安全性和有效性(RIMDAMAL II):一项3期、双盲、安慰剂对照、整群随机、平行组试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2025 Jul;25(7):737-750. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(24)00751-5. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
10
Psychosocial interventions for cannabis use disorder.针对大麻使用障碍的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 5;2016(5):CD005336. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005336.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of eHealth for Medication Adherence in Renal Transplant Recipients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.电子健康对肾移植受者药物依从性的有效性:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 13;27:e73520. doi: 10.2196/73520.
2
Long-term mortality outcome of a primary care-based mobile health intervention for stroke management: Six-year follow-up of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.一项基于初级保健的中风管理移动健康干预措施的长期死亡率结果:一项整群随机对照试验的六年随访
PLoS Med. 2025 Mar 27;22(3):e1004564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004564. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
The structured ambulatory post-stroke care program for outpatient aftercare in patients with ischaemic stroke in Germany (SANO): an open-label, cluster-randomised controlled trial.德国缺血性脑卒中患者门诊康复后结构化门诊卒中后护理方案(SANO):一项开放标签、整群随机对照试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2023 Sep;22(9):787-799. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(23)00216-8. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
2
Sustainability of a 12-month lifestyle intervention delivered by community health workers in reducing blood pressure in Nepal: 5-year follow-up of the COBIN open-label, cluster randomised trial.社区卫生工作者实施的为期 12 个月的生活方式干预对降低尼泊尔血压的可持续性:COBIN 开放性标签、整群随机试验的 5 年随访。
Lancet Glob Health. 2023 Jul;11(7):e1086-e1095. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00214-0.
3
An economic evaluation of a primary care-based technology-enabled intervention for stroke secondary prevention and management in rural China: a study protocol.中国农村地区基于初级保健的技术支持性中风二级预防与管理干预措施的经济学评价:研究方案
Front Neurol. 2023 May 2;14:1145562. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1145562. eCollection 2023.
4
Improving cardiovascular health in rural China and beyond.改善中国农村及其他地区的心血管健康。
Lancet. 2023 Mar 18;401(10380):879-881. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00092-2. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
5
Longer-Term All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality With Intensive Blood Pressure Control: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.强化血压控制的长期全因和心血管死亡率:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Nov 1;7(11):1138-1146. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.3345.
6
Estimands in cluster-randomized trials: choosing analyses that answer the right question.在整群随机临床试验中的估算指标:选择回答正确问题的分析方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Feb 8;52(1):107-118. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac131.
7
A village doctor-led multifaceted intervention for blood pressure control in rural China: an open, cluster randomised trial.农村中国以乡村医生为基础的多方面血压控制干预措施:一项开放、整群随机试验。
Lancet. 2022 May 21;399(10339):1964-1975. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00325-7. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
8
Structured Lifestyle Modification Interventions Involving Frontline Health Workers for Population-Level Blood Pressure Reduction: Results of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in India (DISHA Study).一线卫生工作者参与的结构化生活方式干预对人群血压降低的影响:印度一项集群随机对照试验的结果(DISHA 研究)。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Mar 15;11(6):e023526. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023526. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
9
The Implementation of a Primary Care-Based Integrated Mobile Health Intervention for Stroke Management in Rural China: Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation.中国农村基于初级保健的综合移动医疗干预脑卒中管理的实施:混合方法过程评估。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 17;9:774907. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.774907. eCollection 2021.
10
Effectiveness of community-based health education and home support program to reduce blood pressure among patients with uncontrolled hypertension in Nepal: A cluster-randomized trial.基于社区的健康教育和家庭支持计划对降低尼泊尔未控制高血压患者血压的效果:一项整群随机试验。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 12;16(10):e0258406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258406. eCollection 2021.