• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项基于初级保健的中风管理移动健康干预措施的长期死亡率结果:一项整群随机对照试验的六年随访

Long-term mortality outcome of a primary care-based mobile health intervention for stroke management: Six-year follow-up of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Chen Xingxing, Gong Enying, Tan Jie, Turner Elizabeth L, Gallis John A, Sun Shifeng, Luo Siran, Wu Fei, Yang Bolu, Long Yutong, Wang Yilong, Li Zixiao, Zhou Yun, Tang Shenglan, Bettger Janet P, Oldenburg Brian, Zhang Xiaochen, Gao Jianfeng, Mittman Brian S, Feigin Valery L, Shao Ruitai, Ebrahim Shah, Yan Lijing L

机构信息

School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

Global Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Suzhou, China.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2025 Mar 27;22(3):e1004564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004564. eCollection 2025 Mar.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004564
PMID:40146698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11949329/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite growing evidence of primary care-based interventions for chronic disease management in resource-limited settings, long-term post-trial effects remain inconclusive. We investigated the association of a 12-month system-integrated technology-enabled model of care (SINEMA) intervention with mortality outcomes among patients experiencing stroke at 6-year post-trial.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

This study (clinicltiral.gov registration number: NCT05792618) is a long-term passive observational follow-up of participants and their spouse of the SINEMA trial (clinicaltrial.gov registration number: NCT03185858). The original SINEMA trial was a cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in 50 villages (clusters) in rural China among patients experiencing stroke during July 2017-July 2018. Village doctors in the intervention arm received training, incentives, and a customized mobile health application supporting monthly follow-ups to participants who also received daily free automated voice-messages. Vital status and causes of death were ascertained using local death registry, standardized village doctor records, and verbal autopsy. The post-trial observational follow-up spanned from 13- to 70-months post-baseline (up to April 30, 2023), during which no intervention was requested or supported. The primary outcome of this study was all-cause mortality, with cardiovascular and stroke cause-specific mortality also reported. Cox proportional hazards models with cluster-robust standard errors were used to compute hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), adjusting for town, age, and sex in the main analysis model. Analyses were conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Of 1,299 patients experiencing stroke (mean age 65.7 years, 42.6% females) followed-up to 6 years, 276 (21.2%) died (median time-to-death 43.0 months [quantile 1-quantile 3: 26.7-56.8]). Cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality was 19.0% (121 among 637) in the intervention arm versus 23.4% (155 among 662) in the control arm (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.59, 0.90; p = 0.004); 14.4% versus 17.7% (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.58, 0.94; p = 0.013) for cardiovascular cause-specific mortality; and 6.0% versus 7.9% (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.44, 1.15; p = 0.16) for stroke cause-specific mortality. Although multisource verification was used to verify the outcomes, limitations exist as the survey- and record-matching-based nature of the study, unavailability of accurate clinical diagnostic records for some cases and the potential confounders that may influence the observed association on mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite no observed statistically difference on stroke cause-specific mortality, the 12-month SINEMA intervention, compared with usual care, significantly associated with reduced all-cause and cardiovascular cause-specific mortality during 6 years of follow-up, suggesting potential sustained long-term benefits to patients experiencing stroke.

摘要

背景

尽管在资源有限的环境中,基于初级保健的慢性病管理干预措施的证据越来越多,但试验后的长期效果仍不明确。我们调查了一项为期12个月的系统集成技术支持护理模式(SINEMA)干预与试验后6年中风患者死亡率之间的关联。

方法和结果

本研究(clinicaltrials.gov注册号:NCT05792618)是对SINEMA试验(clinicaltrials.gov注册号:NCT03185858)参与者及其配偶的长期被动观察随访。原SINEMA试验是一项在中国农村50个村庄(群组)进行的整群随机对照试验,研究对象为2017年7月至2018年7月期间发生中风的患者。干预组的乡村医生接受了培训、激励措施,并获得了一款定制的移动健康应用程序,该应用程序支持对参与者进行每月随访,参与者还会收到每日免费自动语音信息。使用当地死亡登记册、标准化的乡村医生记录和口头尸检来确定生命状态和死亡原因。试验后的观察随访从基线后13个月至70个月(截至2023年4月30日),在此期间未要求或提供任何干预。本研究的主要结局是全因死亡率,还报告了心血管疾病和中风特定病因死亡率。使用具有聚类稳健标准误的Cox比例风险模型来计算风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(95%CI),在主要分析模型中对城镇、年龄和性别进行了调整。分析基于意向性分析。在1299例随访6年的中风患者(平均年龄65.7岁,42.6%为女性)中,276例(21.2%)死亡(中位死亡时间43.0个月[四分位数1 - 四分位数3:26.7 - 56.8])。干预组全因死亡率的累积发生率为19.0%(637例中有121例),而对照组为23.4%(662例中有155例)(HR 0.73;95%CI 0.59,0.90;p = 0.004);心血管疾病特定病因死亡率分别为14.4%和17.7%(HR 0.73;95%CI 0.58,0.94;p = 0.013);中风特定病因死亡率分别为6.0%和7.9%(HR 0.71;95%CI 0.44,1.15;p = 0.16)。尽管使用了多源验证来核实结局,但由于研究基于调查和记录匹配的性质、部分病例缺乏准确的临床诊断记录以及可能影响观察到的死亡率关联的潜在混杂因素,仍存在局限性。

结论

尽管在中风特定病因死亡率方面未观察到统计学差异,但与常规护理相比,为期个月的SINEMA干预与随访6年期间全因死亡率和心血管疾病特定病因死亡率的降低显著相关,这表明对中风患者可能有潜在的持续长期益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8333/11949329/d97821e3f2bd/pmed.1004564.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8333/11949329/00aa3f5e8508/pmed.1004564.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8333/11949329/e10ba7bf70b8/pmed.1004564.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8333/11949329/d97821e3f2bd/pmed.1004564.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8333/11949329/00aa3f5e8508/pmed.1004564.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8333/11949329/e10ba7bf70b8/pmed.1004564.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8333/11949329/d97821e3f2bd/pmed.1004564.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term mortality outcome of a primary care-based mobile health intervention for stroke management: Six-year follow-up of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.一项基于初级保健的中风管理移动健康干预措施的长期死亡率结果:一项整群随机对照试验的六年随访
PLoS Med. 2025 Mar 27;22(3):e1004564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004564. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases.用于心血管疾病一级和二级预防的饮食预防高血压(DASH)方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 6;5(5):CD013729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013729.pub2.
3
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
Effects of a gluten-reduced or gluten-free diet for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.减少或无麸质饮食对心血管疾病一级预防的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 24;2(2):CD013556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013556.pub2.
6
Computer and mobile technology interventions for self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理的计算机和移动技术干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 23;5(5):CD011425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011425.pub2.
7
Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年吸烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6(6):CD008645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008645.pub3.
8
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.基于运动的冠心病心脏康复。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 6;11(11):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub4.
9
Self-management interventions including action plans for exacerbations versus usual care in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者自我管理干预措施(包括针对病情加重的行动计划)与常规护理的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 4;8(8):CD011682. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011682.pub2.
10
Smoking cessation for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.戒烟对心血管疾病二级预防的作用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 8;8(8):CD014936. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014936.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary Care-Based Digital Health-Enabled Stroke Management Intervention: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.基于初级保健的数字健康赋能中风管理干预:一项整群随机临床试验的长期随访
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2449561. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.49561.
2
Sustainability of a 12-month lifestyle intervention delivered by community health workers in reducing blood pressure in Nepal: 5-year follow-up of the COBIN open-label, cluster randomised trial.社区卫生工作者实施的为期 12 个月的生活方式干预对降低尼泊尔血压的可持续性:COBIN 开放性标签、整群随机试验的 5 年随访。
Lancet Glob Health. 2023 Jul;11(7):e1086-e1095. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00214-0.
3
An economic evaluation of a primary care-based technology-enabled intervention for stroke secondary prevention and management in rural China: a study protocol.
中国农村地区基于初级保健的技术支持性中风二级预防与管理干预措施的经济学评价:研究方案
Front Neurol. 2023 May 2;14:1145562. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1145562. eCollection 2023.
4
Effectiveness of a non-physician community health-care provider-led intensive blood pressure intervention versus usual care on cardiovascular disease (CRHCP): an open-label, blinded-endpoint, cluster-randomised trial.非医师社区卫生保健提供者主导的强化血压干预与常规护理对心血管疾病的效果(CRHCP):一项开放标签、盲终点、群组随机试验。
Lancet. 2023 Mar 18;401(10380):928-938. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02603-4. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
5
Improving sandwich variance estimation for marginal Cox analysis of cluster randomized trials.提高群组随机试验边缘 Cox 分析中夹层方差估计的方法。
Biom J. 2023 Mar;65(3):e2200113. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202200113. Epub 2022 Dec 25.
6
Integration of a multicomponent intervention for hypertension into primary healthcare services in Singapore-A cluster randomized controlled trial.将一项多组分干预措施整合到新加坡初级医疗保健服务中以治疗高血压-一项群组随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2022 Jun 13;19(6):e1004026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004026. eCollection 2022 Jun.
7
Introducing The Lancet Global Health Commission on financing primary health care: putting people at the centre.介绍《柳叶刀》初级卫生保健融资全球健康委员会:将人置于中心位置。
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Jan;10(1):e20-e21. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00510-6.
8
The Implementation of a Primary Care-Based Integrated Mobile Health Intervention for Stroke Management in Rural China: Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation.中国农村基于初级保健的综合移动医疗干预脑卒中管理的实施:混合方法过程评估。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 17;9:774907. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.774907. eCollection 2021.
9
Temporal trend and attributable risk factors of stroke burden in China, 1990-2019: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.中国 1990-2019 年卒中负担的时间趋势和可归因危险因素:2019 年全球疾病负担研究分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Dec;6(12):e897-e906. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00228-0.
10
Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.1990—2019年全球、区域和国家的卒中负担及其风险因素:全球疾病负担研究2019的系统分析
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Oct;20(10):795-820. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0. Epub 2021 Sep 3.