Chen Xingxing, Gong Enying, Tan Jie, Turner Elizabeth L, Gallis John A, Sun Shifeng, Luo Siran, Wu Fei, Yang Bolu, Long Yutong, Wang Yilong, Li Zixiao, Zhou Yun, Tang Shenglan, Bettger Janet P, Oldenburg Brian, Zhang Xiaochen, Gao Jianfeng, Mittman Brian S, Feigin Valery L, Shao Ruitai, Ebrahim Shah, Yan Lijing L
School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Global Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Suzhou, China.
PLoS Med. 2025 Mar 27;22(3):e1004564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004564. eCollection 2025 Mar.
Despite growing evidence of primary care-based interventions for chronic disease management in resource-limited settings, long-term post-trial effects remain inconclusive. We investigated the association of a 12-month system-integrated technology-enabled model of care (SINEMA) intervention with mortality outcomes among patients experiencing stroke at 6-year post-trial.
This study (clinicltiral.gov registration number: NCT05792618) is a long-term passive observational follow-up of participants and their spouse of the SINEMA trial (clinicaltrial.gov registration number: NCT03185858). The original SINEMA trial was a cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in 50 villages (clusters) in rural China among patients experiencing stroke during July 2017-July 2018. Village doctors in the intervention arm received training, incentives, and a customized mobile health application supporting monthly follow-ups to participants who also received daily free automated voice-messages. Vital status and causes of death were ascertained using local death registry, standardized village doctor records, and verbal autopsy. The post-trial observational follow-up spanned from 13- to 70-months post-baseline (up to April 30, 2023), during which no intervention was requested or supported. The primary outcome of this study was all-cause mortality, with cardiovascular and stroke cause-specific mortality also reported. Cox proportional hazards models with cluster-robust standard errors were used to compute hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), adjusting for town, age, and sex in the main analysis model. Analyses were conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Of 1,299 patients experiencing stroke (mean age 65.7 years, 42.6% females) followed-up to 6 years, 276 (21.2%) died (median time-to-death 43.0 months [quantile 1-quantile 3: 26.7-56.8]). Cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality was 19.0% (121 among 637) in the intervention arm versus 23.4% (155 among 662) in the control arm (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.59, 0.90; p = 0.004); 14.4% versus 17.7% (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.58, 0.94; p = 0.013) for cardiovascular cause-specific mortality; and 6.0% versus 7.9% (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.44, 1.15; p = 0.16) for stroke cause-specific mortality. Although multisource verification was used to verify the outcomes, limitations exist as the survey- and record-matching-based nature of the study, unavailability of accurate clinical diagnostic records for some cases and the potential confounders that may influence the observed association on mortality.
Despite no observed statistically difference on stroke cause-specific mortality, the 12-month SINEMA intervention, compared with usual care, significantly associated with reduced all-cause and cardiovascular cause-specific mortality during 6 years of follow-up, suggesting potential sustained long-term benefits to patients experiencing stroke.
尽管在资源有限的环境中,基于初级保健的慢性病管理干预措施的证据越来越多,但试验后的长期效果仍不明确。我们调查了一项为期12个月的系统集成技术支持护理模式(SINEMA)干预与试验后6年中风患者死亡率之间的关联。
本研究(clinicaltrials.gov注册号:NCT05792618)是对SINEMA试验(clinicaltrials.gov注册号:NCT03185858)参与者及其配偶的长期被动观察随访。原SINEMA试验是一项在中国农村50个村庄(群组)进行的整群随机对照试验,研究对象为2017年7月至2018年7月期间发生中风的患者。干预组的乡村医生接受了培训、激励措施,并获得了一款定制的移动健康应用程序,该应用程序支持对参与者进行每月随访,参与者还会收到每日免费自动语音信息。使用当地死亡登记册、标准化的乡村医生记录和口头尸检来确定生命状态和死亡原因。试验后的观察随访从基线后13个月至70个月(截至2023年4月30日),在此期间未要求或提供任何干预。本研究的主要结局是全因死亡率,还报告了心血管疾病和中风特定病因死亡率。使用具有聚类稳健标准误的Cox比例风险模型来计算风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(95%CI),在主要分析模型中对城镇、年龄和性别进行了调整。分析基于意向性分析。在1299例随访6年的中风患者(平均年龄65.7岁,42.6%为女性)中,276例(21.2%)死亡(中位死亡时间43.0个月[四分位数1 - 四分位数3:26.7 - 56.8])。干预组全因死亡率的累积发生率为19.0%(637例中有121例),而对照组为23.4%(662例中有155例)(HR 0.73;95%CI 0.59,0.90;p = 0.004);心血管疾病特定病因死亡率分别为14.4%和17.7%(HR 0.73;95%CI 0.58,0.94;p = 0.013);中风特定病因死亡率分别为6.0%和7.9%(HR 0.71;95%CI 0.44,1.15;p = 0.16)。尽管使用了多源验证来核实结局,但由于研究基于调查和记录匹配的性质、部分病例缺乏准确的临床诊断记录以及可能影响观察到的死亡率关联的潜在混杂因素,仍存在局限性。
尽管在中风特定病因死亡率方面未观察到统计学差异,但与常规护理相比,为期个月的SINEMA干预与随访6年期间全因死亡率和心血管疾病特定病因死亡率的降低显著相关,这表明对中风患者可能有潜在的持续长期益处。