Anderson G M, Lomas J
Can Med Assoc J. 1985 Feb 1;132(3):253-6, 259.
Using overall rates of cesarean section and either rates of diagnosis or rates of cesarean section for the four main indications for this procedure, we analysed the variations among teaching and community hospitals in four of Ontario's six regions. The rates varied substantially in both 1979 and 1982, with the overall rate for cesarean section in 1982 being 17.1 to 21.0 per 100 deliveries in the teaching hospitals and 16.5 to 19.7 in the community hospitals. The rate of diagnosis of dystocia varied up to threefold in the teaching hospitals and up to twofold in the community hospitals. Fetal distress was diagnosed at even more variables rates. The rate of repeat cesarean section varied most in the teaching hospitals, whereas the rate of cesarean section for breech presentation varied significantly in the community and the teaching hospitals in 1982 but only in the community hospitals in 1979. Nearly all the rates increased between 1979 and 1982. Differences in patient characteristics and in availability of resources appeared less important in explaining these rate variations than differences in clinical policy.
利用剖宫产的总体比率以及该手术四种主要指征的诊断比率或剖宫产比率,我们分析了安大略省六个地区中四个地区教学医院和社区医院之间的差异。1979年和1982年这些比率差异都很大,1982年教学医院剖宫产的总体比率为每100例分娩中有17.1至21.0例,社区医院为16.5至19.7例。教学医院中难产的诊断比率差异高达三倍,社区医院高达两倍。胎儿窘迫的诊断比率变化更大。再次剖宫产的比率在教学医院变化最大,而臀位剖宫产的比率在1982年社区医院和教学医院都有显著差异,但在1979年仅在社区医院有显著差异。1979年至1982年期间,几乎所有比率都有所上升。与临床政策差异相比,患者特征和资源可及性的差异在解释这些比率差异方面似乎不那么重要。