Ding Liang, Lou Lijie, Zhang Mingyang, Zhang Xing
Department of Physical Education and Health, Lvliang University, Lvliang, China; Jin-Sui Sports Research Center, Jinsui, China.
Graduate School, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou, China.
Exp Gerontol. 2025 Feb;200:112652. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2024.112652. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
Aerobic and resistance exercises are widely recognized as essential for preserving and enhancing cognitive function. However, the effects of concurrent exercise on cognition in older adults remain unclear. This systematic review sought to evaluate the regular effects of concurrent aerobic and resistance training on global cognition in healthy older adults. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and CNKI up to July 2024. Randomized controlled trials involving healthy older adults aged ≥65 years that assessed the cognitive effects of concurrent exercise were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the PEDro scale. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was quantified with the I statistic. The initial search identified 13,533 records, ultimately including 12 studies in the meta-analysis, which involved 2557 participants. The meta-analysis revealed non-significant effects of concurrent exercise on global cognition (SMD = 0.12, 95 % CI: -0.08 to 0.33, p = 0.200). The subgroup analysis indicated that concurrent exercise cannot enhance global cognition compared to active controls (SMD = -0.03, 95 % CI: -0.23 to 0.18, p = 0.80), but it does show significant improvement compared to passive controls (SMD = 0.35, 95 % CI: 0.14 to 0.56, p < 0.001). Moderate heterogeneity was observed (I = 49.9 %), and sensitivity analyses confirmed the stability of the results. No significant publication bias was identified. While concurrent exercise was effective in improving global cognition in healthy older adults, the improvements were not superior to active control conditions. Future research should investigate optimal training combinations and sequences to maximize cognitive benefits.
有氧运动和抗阻运动被广泛认为是维持和增强认知功能的关键。然而,同时进行这两种运动对老年人认知的影响仍不明确。本系统评价旨在评估同时进行有氧运动和抗阻训练对健康老年人整体认知的常规影响。截至2024年7月,我们在PubMed、科学网、EMBASE、谷歌学术、考克兰图书馆和中国知网进行了全面检索。纳入了涉及65岁及以上健康老年人且评估了同时运动对认知影响的随机对照试验。使用PEDro量表评估纳入研究的方法学质量。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,并用I统计量对异质性进行量化。初步检索共识别出13533条记录,最终有12项研究纳入荟萃分析,涉及2557名参与者。荟萃分析显示,同时运动对整体认知无显著影响(标准化均数差=0.12,95%置信区间:-0.08至0.33,p=0.200)。亚组分析表明,与主动对照组相比,同时运动并不能增强整体认知(标准化均数差=-0.03,95%置信区间:-0.23至0.18,p=0.80),但与被动对照组相比有显著改善(标准化均数差=0.35,95%置信区间:0.14至0.56,p<0.001)。观察到中度异质性(I=49.9%),敏感性分析证实了结果的稳定性。未发现显著的发表偏倚。虽然同时运动对改善健康老年人的整体认知有效,但改善效果并不优于主动对照条件。未来的研究应探究最佳的训练组合和顺序,以最大化认知益处。