Mohamed Moataz E, Nguyen Tam T, Larson Jared, Schwake Beatrice, Rivers Zachary, Beilman Greg, Skaar Debra J, Jacobson Pamala A
Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Department of Pharmacy, M Health Fairview, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Dec;17(12):e70107. doi: 10.1111/cts.70107.
Unpredicted responses to sedatives and analgesics are common in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation (MV) and may be attributed to genetic variation. Our primary aim was to investigate the association between the pharmacogenomic (PGx) variation and sedation outcomes. The secondary aim was to capture intensive care unit (ICU) participants' perceptions of PGx. This was a prospective, observational PGx association study. Adult ICU patients receiving acute MV and sedatives/analgesics were enrolled. The number of altered PGx phenotypes in genes relevant to fentanyl, propofol, and midazolam (CYP2D6, CYP3A4/5, COMT, OPRM1, and CYP2B6) were tested with logistic regression for association with achieving ≥60% and ≥70% of time within Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) target range (0 to -2) in the first 24 and 48 h of MV. Participants' perceptions of PGx testing and satisfaction with the return of PGx results were collected. Participants (n = 78) had a median of 2 altered PGx phenotypes. Fentanyl and propofol combination was the most frequently administered regimen. There were non-significant associations of worse sedation outcomes with an increasing number of altered PGx phenotypes (i.e., adjusted odds ratio of achieving target RASS range = 0.46 to 0.96 for each altered phenotype increase at both 24 and 48 h). Individuals participating in the post-discharge survey had positive perceptions toward PGx. There were no associations between sedation outcomes and PGx variants in the studied 6 genes. Larger studies are needed to investigate the impact of these genes and to evaluate additional genes. ICU participants had positive attitudes and perceptions toward PGx.
在接受机械通气(MV)的重症患者中,对镇静剂和镇痛药出现意外反应很常见,这可能归因于基因变异。我们的主要目的是研究药物基因组学(PGx)变异与镇静效果之间的关联。次要目的是了解重症监护病房(ICU)参与者对PGx的看法。这是一项前瞻性观察性PGx关联研究。纳入了接受急性MV及镇静剂/镇痛药治疗的成年ICU患者。对与芬太尼、丙泊酚和咪达唑仑相关的基因(CYP2D6、CYP3A4/5、COMT、OPRM1和CYP2B6)中PGx表型改变的数量进行逻辑回归分析,以确定其与MV开始后24小时和48小时内达到里士满躁动 - 镇静量表(RASS)目标范围(0至 -2)的时间≥60%和≥70%之间的关联。收集了参与者对PGx检测的看法以及对PGx结果反馈的满意度。参与者(n = 78)的PGx表型改变中位数为2种。芬太尼和丙泊酚联合用药是最常用的方案。PGx表型改变数量增加与较差的镇静效果之间存在非显著关联(即在24小时和48小时时,每增加一种改变的表型,达到目标RASS范围的调整优势比为0.46至0.96)。参与出院后调查的个体对PGx持积极看法。在所研究的6个基因中,镇静效果与PGx变异之间无关联。需要开展更大规模的研究来调查这些基因的影响并评估其他基因。ICU参与者对PGx持积极态度和看法。