Suppr超能文献

Synapse 3D系统(版本4.4)与DirectPath系统(版本2.0)在虚拟支气管镜导航应用于外周肺结节中的比较。

Comparison of Synapse 3D system (Version 4.4) and DirectPath system (Version 2.0) in virtual bronchoscopic navigation application for peripheral pulmonary nodules.

作者信息

Li Xiang, Tian Sen, Zhang Yifei, Chen Hui, Chen Yilin, Wang Qin, Zhang Wei, Shi Hui, Huang Haidong, Shen Xiaping, Fang Yao, Qu Lei, Hu Zhenhong, Dong Yuchao, Bai Chong

机构信息

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Shanghai Changhai Hospital), Shanghai, China.

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, General Hospital of Central Theater Command of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2024 Jan-Dec;18:17534666241307182. doi: 10.1177/17534666241307182.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Differences between virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN) systems and their impacts on the diagnostic yield of transbronchial biopsy (TBB) of peripheral pulmonary nodules (PPNs) remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the Synapse 3D system (Version 4.4, Fujifilm, Japan) and DirectPath system (Version 2.0, Olympus, Japan) in the VBN application of PPNs.

DESIGN

Retrospective study with self-paired design and exploratory study with retrospective cohort design.

METHODS

The study analyzed patients with PPNs using the Synapse 3D system (Group S) and DirectPath system (Group D) and compared differences between the two groups in bronchial tree reconstruction, navigation pathway planning, and VBN-assisted TBB of PPNs.

RESULTS

In all, 289 patients were analyzed ultimately. Bronchial tree reconstruction quality was better in Group S ( < 0.001). Navigation pathway planning duration in Group S was longer than that in Group D (median 1.35 vs 1.04 s,  < 0.001). Automated navigation pathway planning success rate in Group S was higher than that in Group D (36.7% vs 19.7%,  < 0.001), and CT image reconstruction parameter and nodule diameter, bronchus sign, and distance from the hilum had significant effects on it in both groups. Fifty-six patients in Group S and forty-two patients in Group D were analyzed ultimately. The localization success rate and diagnostic yield of PPNs between the two groups were not significantly different (85.3% vs 91.2% and 67.6% vs 61.8%, respectively,  > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Synapse 3D system (Version 4.4) and DirectPath system (Version 2.0) had their own merits. Localization success rate and diagnostic yield of VBN-assisted TBB were of no statistical difference for these two VBN systems. Improvements in segmentation algorithms of VBN systems and using the most suitable chest CT scan data for them may be the breakthrough to improve the efficiency of VBN, especially for poor experienced interventional physicians.

摘要

背景

虚拟支气管镜导航(VBN)系统之间的差异及其对周围型肺结节(PPN)经支气管活检(TBB)诊断率的影响尚不清楚。

目的

比较Synapse 3D系统(版本4.4,富士胶片,日本)和DirectPath系统(版本2.0,奥林巴斯,日本)在PPN的VBN应用中的表现。

设计

采用自身配对设计的回顾性研究和采用回顾性队列设计的探索性研究。

方法

该研究分析了使用Synapse 3D系统(S组)和DirectPath系统(D组)的PPN患者,并比较了两组在支气管树重建、导航路径规划以及PPN的VBN辅助TBB方面的差异。

结果

最终共分析了289例患者。S组的支气管树重建质量更好(<0.001)。S组的导航路径规划时间长于D组(中位数1.35秒对1.04秒,<0.001)。S组的自动导航路径规划成功率高于D组(36.7%对19.7%,<0.001),且两组中CT图像重建参数、结节直径、支气管征和距肺门距离对其均有显著影响。最终对S组的56例患者和D组的42例患者进行了分析。两组PPN的定位成功率和诊断率无显著差异(分别为85.3%对91.2%和67.6%对61.8%,>0.05)。

结论

Synapse 3D系统(版本4.4)和DirectPath系统(版本2.0)各有优点。这两种VBN系统在VBN辅助TBB的定位成功率和诊断率方面无统计学差异。改进VBN系统的分割算法并为其使用最合适的胸部CT扫描数据可能是提高VBN效率的突破点,尤其对于经验不足的介入医生。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d95/11648045/06b255eee2fc/10.1177_17534666241307182-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验