Suppr超能文献

经济实惠的便携式国际视力键系统用于视力和立体视觉的验证。

Validation of the Affordable, Portable International Visionkeys System for Visual Acuity and Stereopsis.

作者信息

Karlberg Lily A, Sweeney Taylor R, Arnold Robert W

机构信息

University of Washington WWAMI Medical School, Anchorage, AK, USA.

UT Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Dec 10;18:3667-3677. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S494457. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A new, portable computerized distance vision testing (screen plus remote) system called VisionKeys has been developed by the missions equipment developer EyeMobil so we validated it compared to conventional research testing devices.

METHODS

Using a standardized protocol of surround HOTV optotype presentation, the VisionKeys was compared to M&S for patched monocular distance visual acuity. A different VisionKeys function with anaglyph spectacle distance stereopsis was compared to near stereo on Titmus circles with Polaroid goggles and PDI Check on an autostereoscopic screen. Raw scores were converted to logarithm and compared with non-parametric and Bland Altman tests.

RESULTS

We recruited 145 ethnically diverse patients with range of acuity -0.4 to 2.6 (NLP) logMAR from a pediatric eye and adult strabismus practice showing median logMAR acuity of 0.0 with VisionKeys significantly finer resolution than 0.1 for M&S (Mann-Whitney z=2.6, p=0.01, n=290). VisionKeys acuity correlated very well with M&S and children under age 7 scored coarser than teens and young adults. Median distance log arc seconds stereo on VisionKeys (2.00) differed from near Titmus circles (1.78) and PDI Check (1.89, Kruskal-Wallis X2(2)=9.8, p=0.007) however they all correlated well by Bland Altman.

CONCLUSION

The new, portable VisionKeys system gives valid distance visual acuity with slightly finer estimate compared to M&S and the distance stereo compared well with near Titmus and PDI Check. As such, it should be valuable for testing children and adults in remote locations.

摘要

背景

任务设备开发商EyeMobil研发了一种名为VisionKeys的新型便携式计算机化远视力测试(屏幕加远程)系统,因此我们将其与传统研究测试设备进行了对比验证。

方法

采用标准化的环绕式HOTV视标呈现方案,将VisionKeys与M&S用于单眼矫正远视力测试进行对比。将具有红蓝色立体视觉功能的VisionKeys的不同功能,与使用宝丽来护目镜在Titmus视圈上进行的近立体视觉以及在自动立体屏幕上进行的PDI检查进行对比。将原始分数转换为对数形式,并通过非参数检验和布兰德-奥特曼检验进行比较。

结果

我们从儿科眼科和成人斜视诊所招募了145名不同种族的患者,视力范围为-0.4至2.6(无光感)logMAR,使用VisionKeys测得的视力中位数logMAR为0.0,分辨率明显高于M&S的0.1(曼-惠特尼z = 2.6,p = 0.01,n = 290)。VisionKeys测得的视力与M&S测得的视力相关性非常好,7岁以下儿童的视力得分比青少年和年轻人更粗糙。VisionKeys上的远立体视对数弧秒中位数(2.00)与Titmus视圈近立体视(1.78)和PDI检查(1.89)不同(克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯X2(2)=9.8,p = 0.007),然而通过布兰德-奥特曼检验,它们之间的相关性都很好。

结论

新型便携式VisionKeys系统能够提供有效的远视力,与M&S相比估计值略精细,并且远立体视与Titmus视圈近立体视和PDI检查的效果相当。因此,它对于在偏远地区测试儿童和成人应该具有重要价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d6c/11645953/2ebb1f1f1ef7/OPTH-18-3667-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验