Mozafari Javad, Khavanin Ali, Delirrooyfard Ali, Pirouzi Mohammadreza, Asmarian Naeimehossadat
Department of Emergency Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapour University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Iran J Med Sci. 2024 Nov 1;49(11):691-698. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2023.100323.3251. eCollection 2024 Nov.
Acute renal colic has been challenging and has brought many concerns for physicians and patients for centuries. This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic effect and safety of a combination of papaverine and ketorolac against ketorolac and placebo in treating acute renal colic.
This randomized clinical trial was performed in patients with renal colic from May 2018 to May 2020 in Ahvaz, Iran. Patients with colic pain due to sand or kidney stones underwent clinical examination. The pain intensified based on the visual analog scale (VAS) and the patients' need for rescue analgesia are considered as primary outcomes at various times after treatment. Patients were equally divided into two groups: A (ketorolac plus papaverine) and B (ketorolac plus placebo) by block balanced randomization method. Student test, the Chi square, and ANOVA tests were used for statistical analyses, which were performed by SPSS 19.0. P<0.05 was considered significant.
A significant difference was observed in 280 patients (140 patients in each group) in pain intensity between both groups at 45 and 60 min. VAS scores in groups A and B were 5.08±1.23 and 5.56±1.11 in 45 min and 3.35±1.47 and 3.92±1.31 in 60 min (P=0.001, P=0.002), respectively. In subgroup analysis, the VAS score significantly decreased after taking the drug for middle and proximal ureteral stones at 45 and 60 min (P<0.001). Rescue analgesics were required in 7 (5%) and 21 (15%) patients in groups A and B, respectively (P=0.005). Side effects were similar in the two groups.
In this study, ketorolac, along with papaverine, was effective in acute renal colic control, and combination therapy with ketorolac and papaverine was associated with reduced use of other rescue analgesics. IRCT20190217042738N1.
几个世纪以来,急性肾绞痛一直具有挑战性,给医生和患者带来诸多担忧。本研究旨在评估罂粟碱与酮咯酸联合用药相较于酮咯酸和安慰剂治疗急性肾绞痛的镇痛效果及安全性。
本随机临床试验于2018年5月至2020年5月在伊朗阿瓦士对肾绞痛患者进行。因沙子或肾结石导致绞痛的患者接受了临床检查。基于视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛加剧情况以及患者对解救镇痛的需求被视为治疗后不同时间的主要结局。采用区组平衡随机化方法将患者平均分为两组:A组(酮咯酸加罂粟碱)和B组(酮咯酸加安慰剂)。使用学生t检验、卡方检验和方差分析进行统计分析,由SPSS 19.0软件执行。P<0.05被视为具有统计学意义。
在280例患者(每组140例)中,两组在45分钟和60分钟时疼痛强度存在显著差异。A组和B组在45分钟时的VAS评分分别为5.08±1.23和5.56±1.11,在60分钟时分别为3.35±1.47和3.92±1.31(P=0.001,P=0.002)。亚组分析中,对于中、上段输尿管结石患者,服药后45分钟和6分钟时VAS评分显著降低(P<0.001)。A组和B组分别有7例(5%)和21例(15%)患者需要解救镇痛(P=0.005)。两组的副作用相似。
在本研究中,酮咯酸与罂粟碱联合用药对控制急性肾绞痛有效,且酮咯酸与罂粟碱联合治疗与其他解救镇痛药使用减少相关。IRCT20190217042738N1。