• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学院校混合式教学模式评估:教师与学生的偏好及影响因素

Evaluating Blended Teaching Models in Medical Colleges: Preferences and Influential Factors for Teachers and Students.

作者信息

Yang Fan, Liu Pan, Duan Peng, Zhang Dongdong

机构信息

Department of Information, Xiangyang No. 1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang, 441000, People's Republic of China.

Department of Hematology, Xianning Central Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Science and Technology, Xianning, Hubei Province, 437000, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Adv Med Educ Pract. 2024 Dec 10;15:1195-1203. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S487408. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S487408
PMID:39679065
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11645944/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the adoption of blended teaching models by faculty and students at Hubei University of Medicine. It aims to assess their willingness to adopt hybrid learning and identify the factors influencing their choices. The goal is to provide a theoretical foundation for reforming teaching models.

METHODS

We distributed questionnaires to 235 faculty members and 1501 students at Hubei Medical College to assess their preferences for various teaching models. We analyzed the results using multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among the participants, 34.5% of teachers and 33.7% of students preferred the hybrid teaching model. Influential factors for selecting this model included the quality of online teaching (OR=1.601, 95% CI: 1.221-2.100) and teacher-student interaction (OR=2.568, 95% CI: 1.230-5.361) for teachers. For students, significant factors included online learning tools (OR=1.894, 95% CI: 1.002-3.580), a single teaching method (OR=1.390, 95% CI: 1.042-1.856), low learning efficiency (OR=2.154, 95% CI: 1.673-2.774), and the effectiveness of online learning (OR=1.257, 95% CI: 1.181-1.339).

CONCLUSION

The blended teaching model has gained popularity among faculty and students in higher education. Universities should leverage advancements in information technology to address challenges in hybrid teaching. Maximizing students' sense of academic achievement and satisfaction is recommended to enhance and support the blended teaching approach.

摘要

目的

本研究评估湖北医药学院教师和学生对混合式教学模式的采用情况。旨在评估他们采用混合式学习的意愿,并确定影响其选择的因素。目标是为教学模式改革提供理论基础。

方法

我们向湖北医药学院的235名教师和1501名学生发放问卷,以评估他们对各种教学模式的偏好。我们使用多元逻辑回归分析对结果进行分析。

结果

在参与者中,34.5%的教师和33.7%的学生更喜欢混合式教学模式。教师选择该模式的影响因素包括在线教学质量(OR=1.601,95%CI:1.221-2.100)和师生互动(OR=2.568,95%CI:1.230-5.361)。对于学生而言,重要因素包括在线学习工具(OR=1.894,95%CI:1.002-3.580)、单一教学方法(OR=1.390,95%CI:1.042-1.856)、学习效率低(OR=2.154,95%CI:1.673-2.774)以及在线学习的有效性(OR=1.257,95%CI:1.181-1.339)。

结论

混合式教学模式在高等教育的教师和学生中已受到欢迎。大学应利用信息技术的进步来应对混合式教学中的挑战。建议最大化学生的学业成就感和满意度,以加强和支持混合式教学方法。

相似文献

1
Evaluating Blended Teaching Models in Medical Colleges: Preferences and Influential Factors for Teachers and Students.医学院校混合式教学模式评估:教师与学生的偏好及影响因素
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2024 Dec 10;15:1195-1203. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S487408. eCollection 2024.
2
Factors contributing to learning satisfaction with blended learning teaching mode among higher education students in China.影响中国高等教育学生对混合式学习教学模式学习满意度的因素。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 29;14:1193675. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1193675. eCollection 2023.
3
Online education isn't the best choice: evidence-based medical education in the post-epidemic era-a cross-sectional study.在线教育并非最佳选择:后疫情时代基于证据的医学教育——一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Oct 10;23(1):744. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04746-8.
4
Online, Face-to-Face, or Blended Learning? Faculty and Medical Students' Perceptions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Study.线上、面对面还是混合式学习?新冠疫情期间教师与医学生的看法:一项混合方法研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 3;9:791352. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.791352. eCollection 2022.
5
Implementation of a Student-Teacher-Based Blended Curriculum for the Training of Medical Students for Nasopharyngeal Swab and Intramuscular Injection: Mixed Methods Pre-Post and Satisfaction Surveys.基于师生的混合式课程在医学生鼻咽拭子采集和肌内注射培训中的实施:混合方法前后测及满意度调查
JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Mar 2;9:e38870. doi: 10.2196/38870.
6
Factors affecting medical students' satisfaction with online learning: a regression analysis of a survey.影响医学生对在线学习满意度的因素:一项调查的回归分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jan 3;24(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04995-7.
7
The effectiveness of blended learning on students' academic achievement, self-study skills and learning attitudes: A quasi-experiment study in teaching the conventions for coordinates in the plane.混合式学习对学生学业成绩、自学技能和学习态度的有效性:平面坐标惯例教学中的一项准实验研究。
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 26;8(12):e12657. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12657. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
Design and practice of blended teaching of internal medicine nursing based on O-AMAS effective teaching model.基于 O-AMAS 有效教学模式的内科护理学混合式教学的设计与实践。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 28;24(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05588-8.
9
E-Learning during COVID-19: perspectives and experiences of the faculty and students.COVID-19 期间的电子学习:教师和学生的观点与经验。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 28;22(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03383-x.
10
Description of Medical Students' Behavioral, Cognitive, and Psychological Engagement with Faculty Online Teaching Styles.医学生对教师在线教学风格的行为、认知和心理参与度描述
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2024 Feb 19;15:121-132. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S448779. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
An Interactive Learning to Increase the Knowledge of Sexual and Reproductive Health Among University Students: A Pilot Study in West Java, Indonesia.一项提高大学生性与生殖健康知识的互动式学习:印度尼西亚西爪哇省的一项试点研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 May 15;18:2721-2730. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S512267. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Teaching Without Thinking: Negative Evaluations of Rote Pedagogy.不假思索地教学:对死记硬背教学法的负面评价。
Cogn Sci. 2024 Jun;48(6):e13470. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13470.
2
Willingness to practice medicine and related influential factors among medical undergraduates during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study.新冠疫情期间医学生的从医意愿及相关影响因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jun 8;23(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04418-7.
3
Why and How Colleges and Universities Should Leverage Technology Mentoring to Maximize Faculty's Technology Integration Efforts.高校为何以及如何利用技术指导来最大化教师的技术整合努力。
TechTrends. 2023;67(1):124-132. doi: 10.1007/s11528-022-00769-y. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
4
Blended Learning in Health Care Education: An Overview and Overarching Meta-analysis of Systematic Reviews.混合式学习在医疗保健教育中的应用:系统评价的概述和综合分析。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2022 Oct 1;42(4):256-264. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000455. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
5
Online medical education in Egypt during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide assessment of medical students' usage and perceptions.埃及 COVID-19 大流行期间的在线医学教育:对医学生使用和看法的全国评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Mar 30;22(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03249-2.
6
Massive open online courses on health and medicine: review.关于健康与医学的大规模在线开放课程:综述
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Aug 14;16(8):e191. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3439.
7
The Approaches to Teaching Inventory: a critique of its development and applicability.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2006 Sep;76(Pt 3):633-49. doi: 10.1348/000709905X49908.