Cracknell Liz, Fuggle Peter, Bevington Dickon
Anna Freud Centre, London, UK.
Psychodyn Psychiatry. 2024 Dec;52(4):584-605. doi: 10.1521/pdps.2024.52.4.584.
Epistemic trust-trust in the relevance and utility of social learning-is central to helping processes between clients and workers in helping services. Yet, due to their experiences, clients may develop predispositions toward stances of epistemic mistrust or epistemic credulity. From an AMBIT (adaptive mentalization-based integrative treatment) perspective, this article argues that epistemic mistrust and credulity are both social injustice and further social injustice. Helping services commonly respond in ways that fail to acknowledge this social injustice and, perversely, deliver further injustice still. Our primary focus is how these issues relate to work with clients, but we argue that they are present in work within AMBIT's other foci, too: in teams, multiagency networks, and learning. We conclude that workers and helping services have a moral duty to recognize and attend to the multiple social injustices associated with epistemic mistrust and credulity.
认知信任——对社会学习的相关性和效用的信任——是帮助服务中客户与工作者之间帮助过程的核心。然而,由于他们的经历,客户可能会对认知不信任或认知轻信的立场产生倾向。从基于适应性心理化的综合治疗(AMBIT)的角度来看,本文认为认知不信任和轻信既是社会不公正,也是进一步的社会不公正。帮助服务通常以未能承认这种社会不公正的方式做出回应,而且反常的是,还会带来进一步的不公正。我们主要关注的是这些问题如何与和客户的工作相关,但我们认为它们在AMBIT的其他重点工作中也存在:在团队、多机构网络和学习中。我们得出结论,工作者和帮助服务有道德义务认识并关注与认知不信任和轻信相关的多种社会不公正。