• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Quality Improvement Intervention for Reducing Acute Treatment Times in Ischemic Stroke: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.降低缺血性中风急性治疗时间的质量改进干预措施:一项整群随机临床试验
JAMA Neurol. 2025 Feb 1;82(2):160-167. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.4304.
2
Automated Large Vessel Occlusion Detection Software and Thrombectomy Treatment Times: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.自动化大血管闭塞检测软件与取栓治疗时间:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Neurol. 2023 Nov 1;80(11):1182-1190. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.3206.
3
Time From Hospital Arrival Until Endovascular Thrombectomy and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中患者从入院到血管内血栓切除术和患者报告结局的时间。
JAMA Neurol. 2024 Jul 1;81(7):752-761. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.1562.
4
Performance feedback on the quality of care in hospitals performing thrombectomy for ischemic stroke (PERFEQTOS): protocol of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.医院行缺血性脑卒中取栓术护理质量绩效反馈(PERFEQTOS):一项阶梯式楔形集群随机试验方案。
Trials. 2021 Dec 4;22(1):870. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05819-z.
5
Direct to Angiography Suite Without Stopping for Computed Tomography Imaging for Patients With Acute Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.直接进入血管造影套房,不停靠进行计算机断层成像,用于急性脑卒中患者:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Sep 1;78(9):1099-1107. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2385.
6
Effectiveness of a Quality Improvement Intervention on Reperfusion Treatment for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.质量改进干预对急性缺血性脑卒中患者再灌注治疗效果的影响:一项阶梯式楔形集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2316465. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.16465.
7
Relationship between primary stroke center volume and time to endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke.首发卒中中心容量与急性缺血性卒中血管内血栓切除术时间的关系。
Eur J Neurol. 2021 Dec;28(12):4031-4038. doi: 10.1111/ene.15107. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
8
Sex-Based Analysis of Treatment, Time Metrics, and Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated in the Netherlands.荷兰急性缺血性中风患者治疗、时间指标及预后的性别分析
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2025;54(3):356-362. doi: 10.1159/000540224. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
9
Components and Trends in Door to Treatment Times for Endovascular Therapy in Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Hospitals.血管内治疗门到治疗时间的指南-卒中医院的组成和趋势。
Circulation. 2019 Jan 8;139(2):169-179. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036701.
10
Clinical and Neuroimaging Outcomes of Direct Thrombectomy vs Bridging Therapy in Large Vessel Occlusion: Analysis of the SELECT Cohort Study.直接取栓与桥接治疗在大血管闭塞中的临床和神经影像学结局:SELECT 队列研究分析。
Neurology. 2021 Jun 8;96(23):e2839-e2853. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012063. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Inhibitor of Growth Proteins: Epigenetic Regulators Shaping Neurobiology.生长抑制蛋白:塑造神经生物学的表观遗传调节因子
Biomolecules. 2025 Feb 14;15(2):281. doi: 10.3390/biom15020281.

本文引用的文献

1
Improvements in Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Longitudinal Study in the MR CLEAN Registry.急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗的改进:MR CLEAN 登记研究的纵向研究。
Stroke. 2022 Jun;53(6):1863-1872. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034919. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
2
Performance feedback on the quality of care in hospitals performing thrombectomy for ischemic stroke (PERFEQTOS): protocol of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.医院行缺血性脑卒中取栓术护理质量绩效反馈(PERFEQTOS):一项阶梯式楔形集群随机试验方案。
Trials. 2021 Dec 4;22(1):870. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05819-z.
3
Effect of an Enhanced Paramedic Acute Stroke Treatment Assessment on Thrombolysis Delivery During Emergency Stroke Care: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.增强型急救医生急性脑卒中治疗评估对脑卒中急救护理中溶栓治疗实施的影响:一项整群随机临床试验。
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Jul 1;77(7):840-848. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0611.
4
Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.急性缺血性脑卒中患者早期管理指南:2018 年急性缺血性脑卒中早期管理指南的更新:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会发布的医疗保健专业人员指南。
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000211. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
5
The Dutch Acute Stroke Audit: Benchmarking acute stroke care in the Netherlands.荷兰急性卒中审计:荷兰急性卒中护理的基准评估
Eur Stroke J. 2018 Dec;3(4):361-368. doi: 10.1177/2396987318787695. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
6
European Stroke Organisation (ESO) - European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) Guidelines on Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischaemic StrokeEndorsed by Stroke Alliance for Europe (SAFE).欧洲卒中组织(ESO)-欧洲微创神经治疗学会(ESMINT)急性缺血性卒中机械取栓指南,由欧洲卒中联盟(SAFE)认可。
Eur Stroke J. 2019 Mar;4(1):6-12. doi: 10.1177/2396987319832140. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
7
Effect of a Quality of Care Improvement Initiative in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome in Resource-Constrained Hospitals in China: A Randomized Clinical Trial.中国资源受限医院中急性冠状动脉综合征患者的医疗质量改进措施的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 May 1;4(5):418-427. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0897.
8
Effect of enhancing audit and feedback on uptake of childhood pneumonia treatment policy in hospitals that are part of a clinical network: a cluster randomized trial.增强审核与反馈对临床网络内医院采用儿童肺炎治疗政策的效果:一项整群随机试验。
Implement Sci. 2019 Mar 4;14(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0868-4.
9
Effect of Workflow Improvements in Endovascular Stroke Treatment.血管内卒中治疗中工作流程改进的效果。
Stroke. 2019 Mar;50(3):665-674. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021633.
10
Components and Trends in Door to Treatment Times for Endovascular Therapy in Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Hospitals.血管内治疗门到治疗时间的指南-卒中医院的组成和趋势。
Circulation. 2019 Jan 8;139(2):169-179. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036701.

降低缺血性中风急性治疗时间的质量改进干预措施:一项整群随机临床试验

Quality Improvement Intervention for Reducing Acute Treatment Times in Ischemic Stroke: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Hansen Daniël, den Hartog Sanne J, van Leeuwen Nikki, Boiten Jelis, Dinkelaar Wouter, van Doormaal Pieter J, Eijkenaar Frank, Emmer Bart J, van Es Adriaan C G M, Flach H Zwenneke, Gons Rob, den Hertog M Heleen, Imani Farshad, Janssen Paula M, Kortman Hans, Kruyt Nyika D, Kuhrij Laurien S, van der Leij Christiaan, Lo T H Rob, van der Lugt Aad, Lycklama À Nijeholt Geert, Martens Jasper M M, Nederkoorn Paul J, Piet Jurgen, Remmers Michel J M, Roos Yvo B W E M, Silvis Suzanne M, Stolze Lotte J, Stomp Wouter, van Tuijl Julia H, Truijman Martine T B, Vermeer Sarah E, van Walderveen Marianne A A, van den Wijngaard Ido R, Van der Worp H Bart, Yo Lonneke, Dippel Diederik W J, Lingsma Hester F, Roozenbeek Bob

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

JAMA Neurol. 2025 Feb 1;82(2):160-167. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.4304.

DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.4304
PMID:39680396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11811792/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Efficient care processes are crucial to minimize treatment delays and improve outcome after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with ischemic stroke. A potential means to improve care processes is performance feedback.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of performance feedback to hospitals on treatment times for EVT.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cluster randomized clinical trial was conducted from January 1, 2020, to June 30, 2022. Participants were consecutive adult patients with ischemic stroke who underwent EVT in 13 Dutch hospitals. No patients were excluded. Data analysis took place from March to May 2023.

INTERVENTION

The intervention consisted of feedback on hospital performance using structure, process, and outcome indicators. Indicator scores were based on data from a national quality registry and compared with a benchmark. Performance feedback was provided through a dashboard for local quality improvement teams who developed and implemented improvement plans based on the feedback. Every 6 months, 3 to 4 randomly selected hospitals switched to the intervention condition.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was time from door to groin puncture for all patients treated with EVT. Secondary outcomes included door-to-needle time, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at day 2, expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) score, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 months. The effect of the intervention was estimated with multivariable linear mixed models.

RESULTS

A total of 4747 patients were included (intervention: 2431; control: 2316). Their mean (SD) age was 72 (13) years; 2337 (49.2%) were female and 2410 (50.8%) were male. The median (IQR) baseline NIHSS score was 14 (8-19). Median (IQR) door-to-groin puncture time under the intervention condition was 47 (25-71) minutes, compared with 52 (29-75) minutes under the control condition. The adjusted absolute reduction was 5 minutes (β = -4.8; 95% CI, -9.5 to -0.1; P = .04), corresponding to a relative reduction of 9.2% (95% CI, -18.3% to -0.2%).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

This study found that performance feedback provided through a dashboard used by local quality improvement teams reduced door-to-groin puncture time for EVT. Implementation of performance feedback in hospitals providing EVT can improve the quality of care for ischemic stroke.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Netherlands Trial Register: NL9090.

摘要

重要性

高效的护理流程对于最大限度减少缺血性中风患者血管内血栓切除术(EVT)后的治疗延迟及改善预后至关重要。改善护理流程的一种潜在方法是绩效反馈。

目的

评估向医院提供绩效反馈对EVT治疗时间的影响。

设计、设置和参与者:这项整群随机临床试验于2020年1月1日至2022年6月30日进行。参与者为在13家荷兰医院接受EVT的连续成年缺血性中风患者。无患者被排除。数据分析于2023年3月至5月进行。

干预措施

干预包括使用结构、流程和结果指标对医院绩效进行反馈。指标分数基于国家质量登记处的数据,并与基准进行比较。通过仪表盘向当地质量改进团队提供绩效反馈,这些团队根据反馈制定并实施改进计划。每6个月,随机选择3至4家医院转为干预组。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是所有接受EVT治疗患者从入院到股动脉穿刺的时间。次要结局包括入院到穿刺时间、第2天的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分、扩展脑梗死治疗(eTICI)评分以及3个月时的改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分。采用多变量线性混合模型估计干预效果。

结果

共纳入4747例患者(干预组:2431例;对照组:2316例)。他们的平均(标准差)年龄为72(13)岁;女性2337例(49.2%),男性2410例(50.8%)。基线NIHSS评分的中位数(IQR)为14(8 - 19)。干预组从入院到股动脉穿刺时间的中位数(IQR)为47(25 - 71)分钟,而对照组为52(29 - 75)分钟。调整后的绝对缩短时间为5分钟(β = -4.8;95%CI,-9.5至-0.1;P = 0.04),相当于相对缩短9.2%(95%CI,-18.3%至-0.2%)。

结论及意义

本研究发现,通过当地质量改进团队使用的仪表盘提供绩效反馈可缩短EVT的入院到股动脉穿刺时间。在提供EVT的医院实施绩效反馈可提高缺血性中风的护理质量。

试验注册

荷兰试验注册中心:NL9090