Suppr超能文献

血管内卒中治疗中工作流程改进的效果。

Effect of Workflow Improvements in Endovascular Stroke Treatment.

机构信息

From the Department of Neurology (P.M.J., E.V., D.W.J.D.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Public Health (E.V.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Stroke. 2019 Mar;50(3):665-674. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021633.

Abstract

Background and Purpose- Rapid initiation of endovascular stroke treatment is associated with better clinical outcome. The effect of specific improvements is not well known. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of specific workflow improvements on time to treatment and outcome. Methods- A random-effects meta-analysis was used to evaluate the difference in mean time to treatment between intervention group and control group. Secondary outcomes included good functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2). Results- Fifty-one studies (3 randomized controlled trials, 13 prepost intervention studies, and 35 observational studies) with in total 8467 patients were included. Most frequently reported workflow intervention types concerned anesthetic management (n=26), in-hospital patient transfer management (n=14), and prehospital management (n=11). Patients in the intervention group had shorter time to treatment intervals (weighted mean difference, 26 minutes; 95% CI, 19-33; P<0.001) compared with controls. Subgroup meta-analysis of intervention types also showed a shorter time to treatment in the intervention group: a mean difference of 12 minutes (95% CI, 6-17; P<0.001) for anesthetic management, 37 minutes (95% CI, 22-52; P<0.001) for prehospital management, 41 minutes (95% CI, 27-54; P<0.001) for in-hospital patient transfer management, 47 minutes (95% CI, 28-67; P<0.001) for teamwork, and 64 minutes (95% CI, 24-104; P=0.002) for feedback. The mean difference in time to treatment of studies with multiple interventions implemented simultaneously was 50 minutes (95% CI, 31-69; P<0.001) in favor of the intervention group. Patients in the intervention group had increased likelihood of favorable outcome (risk ratio [RR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.15-1.66; P<0.001). Conclusions- Interventions in the workflow of endovascular stroke treatment lead to a significant reduction in time to treatment and results in an increased likelihood of favorable outcome. Acute stroke care should be reorganized by making use of the examples of workflow interventions described in this review to ensure the best medical care for stroke patients.

摘要

背景与目的- 血管内卒中治疗的快速启动与更好的临床结局相关。特定改进的效果尚不清楚。我们对特定工作流程改进对治疗时间和结局的影响进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。

方法- 使用随机效应荟萃分析评估干预组和对照组之间治疗时间的平均差异。次要结局包括 90 天时的良好功能结局(改良 Rankin 量表评分 0-2)。

结果- 共纳入 51 项研究(3 项随机对照试验、13 项前后干预研究和 35 项观察性研究),共纳入 8467 例患者。最常报道的工作流程干预类型涉及麻醉管理(n=26)、院内患者转运管理(n=14)和院前管理(n=11)。与对照组相比,干预组的治疗时间间隔更短(加权平均差异,26 分钟;95%置信区间,19-33;P<0.001)。干预类型的亚组荟萃分析也显示干预组的治疗时间更短:麻醉管理的平均差异为 12 分钟(95%置信区间,6-17;P<0.001),院前管理为 37 分钟(95%置信区间,22-52;P<0.001),院内患者转运管理为 41 分钟(95%置信区间,27-54;P<0.001),团队合作管理为 47 分钟(95%置信区间,28-67;P<0.001),反馈管理为 64 分钟(95%置信区间,24-104;P=0.002)。同时实施多项干预措施的研究的治疗时间平均差异为 50 分钟(95%置信区间,31-69;P<0.001),有利于干预组。干预组患者获得良好结局的可能性增加(风险比[RR],1.39;95%置信区间,1.15-1.66;P<0.001)。

结论- 血管内卒中治疗工作流程中的干预措施可显著缩短治疗时间,并增加获得良好结局的可能性。应通过利用本综述中描述的工作流程干预示例来重新组织急性卒中护理,以确保为卒中患者提供最佳医疗服务。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验