Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Andrology. 2022 Nov;10(8):1511-1521. doi: 10.1111/andr.13242. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
Several studies indicate adverse effects of selected heat exposures on semen quality, but few studies have directly evaluated fertility as an endpoint.
We evaluated prospectively the association between male heat exposures and fecundability, the per-cycle probability of conception.
We analyzed data from 3041 couples residing in the United States or Canada who enrolled in a prospective preconception cohort study (2013-2021). At enrollment, males reported on several heat-related exposures, such as use of saunas, hot baths, seat heaters, and tight-fitting underwear. Pregnancy status was updated on female follow-up questionnaires every 8 weeks until conception or a censoring event (initiation of fertility treatment, cessation of pregnancy attempts, withdrawal, loss to follow-up, or 12 cycles), whichever came first. We used proportional probabilities regression models to estimate fecundability ratios (FR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between heat exposures and fecundability, mutually adjusting for heat exposures and other potential confounders.
We observed small inverse associations for hot bath/tub use (≥3 vs. 0 times/month: FR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.70-1.07) and fever in the 3 months before baseline (FR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.79-1.12; one cycle of follow-up: FR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.64-1.11). Little association was found for sauna use, hours of laptop use on one's lap, seat heater use, time spent sitting, and use of tight-fitting underwear. Based on a cumulative heat metric, FRs for 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 versus 0 heat exposures were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.87-1.12), 1.03 (95% CI: 0.89-1.19), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.74-1.19), and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.50-1.17), respectively. Associations were stronger among men aged ≥30 years (≥4 vs. 0 heat exposures: FR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.34-1.04).
Male use of hot tubs/baths and fever showed weak inverse associations with fecundability. Cumulative exposure to multiple heat sources was associated with a moderate reduction in fecundability, particularly among males aged ≥30 years.
几项研究表明,某些热暴露对精液质量有不良影响,但很少有研究直接评估生育能力作为终点。
我们前瞻性地评估男性热暴露与受孕能力(即每周期妊娠概率)之间的关系。
我们分析了来自美国或加拿大的 3041 对夫妇的前瞻性孕前队列研究(2013-2021 年)的数据。在入组时,男性报告了几种与热有关的暴露,如使用桑拿浴室、热水浴、座椅加热器和紧身内衣。女性在每次 8 周的随访问卷中更新妊娠状况,直到受孕或出现以下情况之一:开始进行生育治疗、停止妊娠尝试、退出、失访或 12 个周期。我们使用比例概率回归模型来估计热暴露与受孕能力之间的受孕能力比(FR)和 95%置信区间(CI),并相互调整热暴露和其他潜在混杂因素。
我们观察到热水浴/浴缸使用(≥3 次/月与 0 次/月:FR=0.87,95%CI:0.70-1.07)和基线前 3 个月发热(FR=0.94,95%CI:0.79-1.12;一个周期的随访:FR=0.84,95%CI:0.64-1.11)的负向关联较小。使用桑拿浴室、大腿上使用笔记本电脑的时间、座椅加热器使用、坐着的时间和使用紧身内衣与受孕能力的相关性不大。基于累积热指标,1、2、3 和≥4 次与 0 次热暴露的 FR 分别为 0.99(95%CI:0.87-1.12)、1.03(95%CI:0.89-1.19)、0.94(95%CI:0.74-1.19)和 0.77(95%CI:0.50-1.17)。≥30 岁的男性(≥4 次与 0 次热暴露:FR=0.60,95%CI:0.34-1.04)的相关性更强。
男性使用热水浴缸/浴盆和发热与受孕能力呈弱负相关。暴露于多种热源的累积量与受孕能力适度下降有关,尤其是≥30 岁的男性。