Maxwell Christina, Salsberg Jon, Robinson Katie, Desmeules François, Lowry Véronique, Tetreault Christie, McCreesh Karen
School of Allied Health, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Phys Ther. 2025 Mar 3;105(3). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzae176.
The objective was to identify the priorities of individuals with musculoskeletal shoulder pain and their health care providers (HCPs) that are perceived to foster multistakeholder adherence to evidence-based recommendations.
The study used a mixed-methods design, informed by concept mapping. Patients with shoulder pain (ie, ≥6 weeks) and HCPs involved in their care (recruited via social media, email, etc) were invited to complete an initial survey to identify perceived priorities to foster adherence to evidence-based recommendations. Preliminary data sorting resulted in a final priority list, with a subset (n = 20) of respondents rating their importance using a Likert scale. A public and patient involvement (PPI) panel (N = 8) assisted in this rating phase, further sorting of priorities based on thematic similarities (ie, into categories and then domains), analysis, interpretation, and developing a concept map illustrating relationships between them.
One hundred and fifty-four participants (HCPs = 133; patients = 21) responded to the initial survey, generating 77 priorities, grouped into 13 categories, and then into 3 domains: (1) Education, (2) Patient-centered care, and (3) Health care communication. Patients prioritized categories relating to the provision of a specific diagnosis, the establishment of a strong therapeutic relationship, and the need for education on progress and recovery timelines, as well as treatment options. HCPs prioritized these same educational categories, also prioritizing the need for tailoring exercise therapy and providing a unified message on best management. PPI panelists identified education on treatment options coupled with a strong therapeutic alliance and a unified message on best management to be of pivotal importance in fostering adherence. Panelists also stressed that future knowledge translation resources must provide tailored education.
HCPs and patients agree on the need to prioritize education related to progress and recovery timelines as well as treatment options, with a strong therapeutic alliance and a unified message on best management also considered of pivotal importance for adherence to evidence-based recommendations.
To the knowledge of the authors, this is the first study, including a broad range of stakeholder groups spanning across 11 different countries, to explore the priorities that stakeholders perceived to support stricter adherence to evidence-based recommendations for musculoskeletal shoulder pain, with the relationship between these priorities visually illustrated using a concept map. Patients and HCPs were united in their prioritization of education relating to expected progress and recovery timelines, as well as treatment options and supporting evidence. Stakeholders also identified the need for greater emphasis to be placed on establishing a therapeutic relationship and on integrating shared decision-making into clinical practice to further facilitate adherence. Education relating to treatment options and supporting evidence, a strong therapeutic relationship, and a unified message on best management were perceived by the PPI panel as being pivotal in facilitating adherence to evidence-based treatment. The findings of this study highlight the need for improved tailoring of educational resources for shoulder pain, as well as more cohesive messaging from health care providers, both assisting in supporting first-line treatments, such as exercise therapy, for musculoskeletal shoulder pain.
本研究旨在确定患有肩部肌肉骨骼疼痛的患者及其医疗服务提供者(HCP)所认为的能够促进多利益相关方遵循循证建议的优先事项。
本研究采用混合方法设计,并以概念图为依据。邀请患有肩部疼痛(即疼痛持续≥6周)的患者及其护理过程中涉及的HCP(通过社交媒体、电子邮件等方式招募)完成一项初始调查,以确定他们所认为的促进遵循循证建议的优先事项。初步数据分类得出了最终的优先事项清单,一部分受访者(n = 20)使用李克特量表对这些事项的重要性进行评分。一个公众与患者参与(PPI)小组(N = 8)协助进行此评分阶段的工作,根据主题相似性对优先事项进行进一步分类(即分为类别,然后再分为领域)、分析、解读,并绘制一幅概念图来说明它们之间的关系。
154名参与者(HCP = 133名;患者 = 21名)对初始调查做出了回应,共提出77项优先事项,这些事项被归为13个类别,然后再归为3个领域:(1)教育,(2)以患者为中心的护理,以及(3)医疗保健沟通。患者将与提供具体诊断、建立牢固治疗关系、需要了解进展和恢复时间线以及治疗选择相关的类别列为优先事项。HCP也将这些相同的教育类别列为优先事项,还将定制运动疗法以及就最佳管理提供统一信息的需求列为优先事项。PPI小组成员认为,关于治疗选择的教育、牢固的治疗联盟以及就最佳管理提供统一信息对于促进遵循循证建议至关重要。小组成员还强调,未来的知识转化资源必须提供量身定制的教育。
HCP和患者一致认为,需要将与进展和恢复时间线以及治疗选择相关的教育列为优先事项,同时牢固的治疗联盟以及就最佳管理提供统一信息对于遵循循证建议也至关重要。
据作者所知,这是第一项涵盖来自11个不同国家的广泛利益相关方群体的研究,旨在探索利益相关方所认为的支持更严格遵循肩部肌肉骨骼疼痛循证建议的优先事项,并使用概念图直观地展示这些优先事项之间的关系。患者和HCP在将与预期进展和恢复时间线、治疗选择及支持证据相关的教育列为优先事项方面达成了一致。利益相关方还确定需要更加重视建立治疗关系以及将共同决策纳入临床实践,以进一步促进遵循循证建议。PPI小组认为,关于治疗选择和支持证据的教育、牢固的治疗关系以及就最佳管理提供统一信息对于促进遵循循证治疗至关重要。本研究结果凸显了改进肩部疼痛教育资源定制的必要性,以及医疗服务提供者发出更具凝聚力信息的必要性,这两者都有助于支持针对肩部肌肉骨骼疼痛的一线治疗,如运动疗法。