Wasti Sharada Prasad, Simkhada Padam, van Teijlingen Edwin R, Sathian Brijesh, Banerjee Indrajit
School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, United Kingdom.
Centre for Midwifery, Maternal and Perinatal Health, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, United Kingdom.
Nepal J Epidemiol. 2022 Mar 31;12(1):1175-1178. doi: 10.3126/nje.v12i1.43633. eCollection 2022 Mar.
This paper illustrates the growing importance of mixed-methods research to many health disciplines ranging from nursing to epidemiology. Mixed-methods approaches requires not only the skills of the individual quantitative and qualitative methods but also a skill set to bring two methods/datasets/findings together in the most appropriate way. Health researchers need to pay careful attention to the 'best' approach to designing, implementing, analysing, integrating both quantitative (number) and qualitative (word) information and writing this up in a way offers greater insights and enhances its applicability. This paper highlights the strengths and weaknesses of mixed-methods approaches as well as some of the common mistakes made by researchers applying mixed-methods for the first time.
本文阐述了混合方法研究对从护理学到流行病学等众多健康学科日益增长的重要性。混合方法途径不仅需要个体定量和定性方法的技能,还需要一套技能,以便以最合适的方式将两种方法/数据集/研究结果结合起来。健康研究人员需要密切关注设计、实施、分析、整合定量(数字)和定性(文字)信息的“最佳”方法,并以一种能提供更深刻见解并增强其适用性的方式进行撰写。本文强调了混合方法途径的优点和缺点,以及首次应用混合方法的研究人员所犯的一些常见错误。