Bigman Galya, Rusu Marius Emil, Kleckner Amber S, Sorkin John D, Jin Yichen, Talegawkar Sameera A, Tanaka Toshiko, Ferrucci Luigi, Ryan Alice S
Division of Gerontology, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Nutrients. 2024 Dec 9;16(23):4249. doi: 10.3390/nu16234249.
Plant-based diets are associated with various health benefits; however, their impact on physical performance in aging populations remains unclear.
To investigate the associations between adherence to plant-based diets and physical performance, focusing on their potential protective effects against age-related declines in function.
Data were obtained from men and women aged 40 years or older in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA) (mean ± SD age: 68 ± 13 years at the first dietary visit; n = 1389). Dietary intake was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Plant-based diets, calculated from 18 food groups, were categorized as overall (PDI), healthful (hPDI), or unhealthful (uPDI), and their tertiles across visits were analyzed. Multivariable linear mixed-effects models were used to examine the association between repeated measurements of three physical performance outcomes-Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), grip strength (kg), and gait speed (m/s)-and adherence to each plant-based diet.
In fully adjusted models, SPPB and grip strength were significantly associated with both hPDI and uPDI, but not with PDI. For hPDI, the intermediate tertile showed the greatest benefit, with SPPB scores 0.5 points higher (β = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.30-0.70, < 0.001) over the follow-up period. In contrast, for uPDI, a 0.27-point lower SPPB score was seen (β = -0.27, 95% CI: -0.48 to -0.07, = 0.009). Longitudinally, grip strength was positively associated with hPDI (β = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.24-2.05, = 0.0013). Similar results were observed in older adults aged ≥65 years.
Adherence to hPDI may benefit lower body function and muscle strength, while uPDI appears to have adverse effects. This suggests that the quality of plant-based foods is essential for maintaining functional well-being in older adults. Further research is needed to confirm these findings, explore underlying mechanisms, and identify strategies to optimize plant-based dietary patterns for aging populations.
以植物为基础的饮食与多种健康益处相关;然而,它们对老年人群体能的影响仍不明确。
研究坚持以植物为基础的饮食与体能之间的关联,重点关注其对与年龄相关的功能衰退的潜在保护作用。
数据来自巴尔的摩纵向衰老研究(BLSA)中40岁及以上的男性和女性(首次饮食访视时的平均±标准差年龄:68±13岁;n = 1389)。使用食物频率问卷(FFQ)评估饮食摄入量。根据18个食物组计算得出的以植物为基础的饮食分为总体(PDI)、健康(hPDI)或不健康(uPDI),并分析其在各次访视中的三分位数。使用多变量线性混合效应模型来检验三种体能指标——简短体能状况量表(SPPB)、握力(千克)和步速(米/秒)——的重复测量值与坚持每种以植物为基础的饮食之间的关联。
在完全调整模型中,SPPB和握力与hPDI和uPDI均显著相关,但与PDI无关。对于hPDI,中间三分位数显示出最大益处,在随访期间SPPB得分比其他组高0.5分(β = 0.50,95%置信区间:0.30 - 0.70,P < 0.001)。相比之下,对于uPDI,SPPB得分低0.27分(β = -0.27,95%置信区间:-0.48至-0.07,P = 0.009)。纵向来看,握力与hPDI呈正相关(β = 1.14,95%置信区间:0.24 - 2.05,P = 0.0013)。在65岁及以上的老年人中也观察到了类似结果。
坚持hPDI可能有益于下肢功能和肌肉力量,而uPDI似乎有不利影响。这表明植物性食物的质量对于维持老年人的功能健康至关重要。需要进一步研究来证实这些发现,探索潜在机制,并确定优化老年人群以植物为基础的饮食模式的策略。