Suppr超能文献

实践操作的机器人显微外科手术:机器人辅助上肢游离皮瓣重建术

Hands-On Robotic Microsurgery: Robotic-Assisted Free Flap Reconstruction of the Upper Extremity.

作者信息

Struebing Felix, Bigdeli Amir Khosrow, Boecker Arne, Weigel Jonathan, Kneser Ulrich, Gazyakan Emre

机构信息

BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Heidelberg University, Ludwig-Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 6;13(23):7450. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237450.

Abstract

: Robot-assisted microsurgery (RAMS) has been introduced into the field of plastic surgery in recent years. It potentially offers enhanced precision and control compared to traditional methods, which is crucial for complex microvascular tasks in free flap reconstructions. We aim to analyze our experiences with robotic-assisted microsurgery in the field of upper extremity free flap reconstruction. : This prospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the Symani Surgical System for free flap reconstructions in 16 patients with upper extremity defects at our institution from February 2023 to March 2024. Operating times were compared to a matched, historical cohort. We collected data on surgical outcomes, operative times, and complication rates, following strict adherence to the Declaration of Helsinki. : Our cohort primarily involved male patients (81%) with defects mostly located on the hand (81%). The anterolateral thigh flap was the most commonly used free flap (14/16, 88%). The average operative time was 368 ± 89 min (range: 216-550 min). No complete or partial flap losses were observed, but one flap required revision surgery due to arterial thrombosis. Major complications occurred in 13% of the cases. The average anastomosis time was 31 ± 12 min (range: 20-35 min) for arterial end-to-end anastomoses and 33 ± 13 min (range: 20-60 min) for arterial end-to-side anastomoses. Venous anastomoses required, on average, 20 ± 6 min. Operating times were not significantly longer when compared to the historical cohort ( = 0.67). : We were able to show comparable outcomes to conventional microsurgery, while requiring more time for the microsurgical anastomoses. The study highlights the need for larger, controlled trials to better understand the benefits and limitations of robotic assistance in microsurgical reconstruction of the upper extremity.

摘要

近年来,机器人辅助显微外科手术(RAMS)已被引入整形外科领域。与传统方法相比,它可能具有更高的精度和控制能力,这对于游离皮瓣重建中的复杂微血管任务至关重要。我们旨在分析我们在机器人辅助显微外科手术用于上肢游离皮瓣重建领域的经验。

本前瞻性研究评估了2023年2月至2024年3月期间在我们机构使用Symani手术系统对16例上肢缺损患者进行游离皮瓣重建的疗效和安全性。将手术时间与匹配的历史队列进行比较。我们严格遵循《赫尔辛基宣言》,收集了手术结果、手术时间和并发症发生率的数据。

我们的队列主要包括男性患者(81%),缺损大多位于手部(81%)。股前外侧皮瓣是最常用的游离皮瓣(14/16,88%)。平均手术时间为368±89分钟(范围:216 - 550分钟)。未观察到完全或部分皮瓣丢失,但有一个皮瓣因动脉血栓形成需要进行修复手术。13%的病例发生了主要并发症。动脉端端吻合的平均吻合时间为31±12分钟(范围:20 - 35分钟),动脉端侧吻合的平均吻合时间为33±13分钟(范围:20 - 60分钟)。静脉吻合平均需要20±6分钟。与历史队列相比,手术时间没有显著延长(P = 0.67)。

我们能够证明与传统显微外科手术有可比的结果,同时显微外科吻合需要更多时间。该研究强调需要进行更大规模的对照试验,以更好地了解机器人辅助在上肢显微外科重建中的益处和局限性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c720/11642342/0eb20808854f/jcm-13-07450-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验