• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全遥测机器人显微外科手术:23 例临床经验。

Fully Telemetric Robotic Microsurgery: Clinical Experience With 23 Cases.

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Institute of Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Munster, Munster, Germany.

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Hand Surgery, Fachklinik Hornheide, Munster, Germany.

出版信息

Microsurgery. 2024 Sep;44(6):e31227. doi: 10.1002/micr.31227.

DOI:10.1002/micr.31227
PMID:39207211
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, there is an ongoing trend in plastic surgery with robotic-assisted microsurgery and supermicrosurgery devices being developed. Combining a telemetrically controlled robotic microscope with an also telemetrically controlled microsurgery robot unlocks synergistic effects with complete disconnection of the operating surgeon from the operating field. Here, we report the first clinical free flap reconstructions using this setup.

METHODS

Twenty-three surgeries were performed with the combined remote approach using the Symani Surgical System and the RoboticScope in open microsurgery procedures. Anastomosis time and ischemia time were recorded. The surgical performance for anastomoses was assessed using the modified Structured Assessment of Microsurgical Skills (SAMS) score. Subjective satisfaction was evaluated by the surgeons in comparison with conventional microsurgery. To evaluate the learning curve, the senior authors first four (first group) and last four (last group) procedures were compared.

RESULTS

Overall, flap survival was 95.7%. The average arterial anastomosis time was 36.7 ± 10.9 min. Total time of surgery was 277.7 ± 63.8 min, and ischemia time was 100.6 ± 24.9 min. Most SAMS score parameters were significantly higher in the last group of surgical procedures compared with the first operations. Subjective satisfaction was equal or better with the combined robotic-assisted approach in most categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrates safety and feasibility of the use of a combined remote approach. Robotic systems for microsurgical procedures may hold promising potential for improvement of surgical quality and open up new frontiers in microsurgery.

摘要

背景

最近,在整形外科学领域出现了一种新趋势,即开发机器人辅助微创手术和超微创手术设备。通过将遥测控制的显微镜与遥测控制的微创手术机器人相结合,可以实现协同效应,使手术医生完全与手术区域隔离。在此,我们报告首例使用该设备进行游离皮瓣重建的临床案例。

方法

在 23 例开放性显微手术中,使用 Symani 手术系统和 RoboticScope 进行了联合远程手术。记录吻合时间和缺血时间。使用改良的显微外科技能结构化评估(SAMS)评分评估吻合的手术表现。与传统显微外科相比,外科医生评估主观满意度。为了评估学习曲线,资深作者比较了前 4 例(第 1 组)和后 4 例(第 2 组)手术。

结果

总的来说,皮瓣存活率为 95.7%。平均动脉吻合时间为 36.7±10.9 分钟。手术总时间为 277.7±63.8 分钟,缺血时间为 100.6±24.9 分钟。与第 1 组手术相比,最后一组手术的大多数 SAMS 评分参数明显更高。在大多数类别中,联合机器人辅助方法的主观满意度相等或更高。

结论

我们的数据表明,联合远程方法的使用具有安全性和可行性。用于显微手术的机器人系统可能具有提高手术质量的巨大潜力,并为显微外科开辟新的领域。

相似文献

1
Fully Telemetric Robotic Microsurgery: Clinical Experience With 23 Cases.全遥测机器人显微外科手术:23 例临床经验。
Microsurgery. 2024 Sep;44(6):e31227. doi: 10.1002/micr.31227.
2
Robotic-Assisted Anastomosis in Orthoplastic Surgery: Preliminary Data.机器人辅助吻合术在整形外科学中的应用:初步数据。
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2024 Apr;56(2):135-140. doi: 10.1055/a-2285-4597. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
3
Learning curve of robotic assisted microsurgery in surgeons with different skill levels: a prospective preclinical study.不同技能水平的外科医生进行机器人辅助微创手术的学习曲线:一项前瞻性临床前研究。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Sep 28;18(1):353. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02114-2.
4
Ideal suturing technique for robot-assisted microsurgical anastomoses.机器人辅助显微吻合的理想缝合技术。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 29;18(1):272. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02012-7.
5
[Robot-assisted Microsurgery in Lower Extremity Reconstruction].[机器人辅助显微外科技术在下肢重建中的应用]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2024 Apr;56(2):128-134. doi: 10.1055/a-2264-6866. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
6
First experience using a novel microsurgical robotic device for free flap surgery in cranio- and maxillofacial surgery.在颅面外科中首次使用新型微创机器人装置进行游离皮瓣手术的经验。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2024 Jun;52(6):704-706. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2024.03.017. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
7
First-in-Human Free Flap Tissue Reconstruction Using a Dedicated Microsurgical Robotic Platform.首例使用专用显微外科机器人平台进行的游离皮瓣组织重建。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 May 1;151(5):1078-1082. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010108. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
8
[Robot-assisted Microsurgery for Autologous Breast Reconstruction - Robotic Breast Reconstruction].[机器人辅助自体乳房重建显微外科手术——机器人乳房重建]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2024 Apr;56(2):114-121. doi: 10.1055/a-2241-5737. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
9
Exploring the learning curve of a new robotic microsurgical system for microsurgery.探索一种用于显微手术的新型机器人显微手术系统的学习曲线。
JPRAS Open. 2022 Sep 10;34:126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2022.09.002. eCollection 2022 Dec.
10
100 anastomoses: a two-year single-center experience with robotic-assisted micro- and supermicrosurgery for lymphatic reconstruction.100 例吻合术:机器人辅助微和超显微淋巴管重建术的两年单中心经验。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Apr 6;18(1):164. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01937-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Clinical Utility of Robotic Systems in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review.评估机器人系统在整形与重建外科中的临床效用:一项系统综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 May 21;25(10):3238. doi: 10.3390/s25103238.
2
Clinical experience in open robotic-assisted microsurgery: user consensus of the European Federation of Societies for Microsurgery.开放式机器人辅助显微外科手术的临床经验:欧洲显微外科学会联合会的用户共识
J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 22;19(1):171. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02338-w.
3
Use of Robotic Surgery in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Narrative Review.
机器人手术在整形与重建外科中的应用:一项叙述性综述
Biomimetics (Basel). 2025 Feb 9;10(2):97. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics10020097.
4
Comparative Evaluation of Major Robotic Systems in Microanastomosis Procedures: A Systematic Review of Current Capabilities and Future Potential.显微吻合手术中主要机器人系统的比较评估:当前能力与未来潜力的系统评价
Brain Sci. 2024 Dec 9;14(12):1235. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14121235.