• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小儿犬咬伤心理社会干预措施的普及率:吠声真的比咬伤更严重吗?

Prevalence of psychosocial interventions for pediatric dog bite injury: Is the bark actually worse than the bite?

作者信息

Patterson Kelli N, Bourgeois Tran, Wurster LeeAnn, VerLee Sarah N, Gil Lindsay A, Horvath Kyle Z, Minneci Peter C, Deans Katherine J, Thakkar Rajan K, Schwartz Dana

机构信息

Center for Surgical Outcomes Research, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH 43205 USA.

Center for Pediatric Trauma Research, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH 43205 USA.

出版信息

J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2024 Mar 12;17(4):1013-1018. doi: 10.1007/s40653-024-00619-4. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.1007/s40653-024-00619-4
PMID:39686930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11646243/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Long-term psychological effects may occur after childhood dog bite injuries. We performed a national survey to assess psychosocial interventions for children presenting with dog bite injuries to pediatric trauma centers.

METHODS

A 26-question, online survey was administered to Pediatric Trauma Program Managers in the United States ( = 83). The survey queried whether institutions provide directed psychosocial interventions to pediatric dog bite injury patients in the Emergency Department, inpatient, or outpatient settings and the types of interventions being used. Descriptive statistics were performed to demonstrate survey results.

RESULTS

In total, 28 American College of Surgeons or State-verified Pediatric Trauma Centers responded to the survey ( = 28/83, 34%). Of the respondents, 18 (64.3%) did not have any interventions in place to address the psychosocial effects of pediatric patients' dog bite injuries. Of the 10 (35.7%) institutions with interventions in place, the types of psychosocial resources offered included: automated order sets within the electronic medical record, specialized teams that assess the patient while hospitalized or outpatient, child psychology referrals initiated at discharge, pet therapy, and trauma resiliency programs.

CONCLUSION

Most institutions surveyed did not have protocols or interventions in place to address psychosocial disturbances in children with dog bite injuries. We provide the example of our institution's practice, in which automatic psychology consults are placed for every child who is admitted with a dog bite injury. Performing caregiver education in the emergency department, providing caregivers with regional psychosocial resources, and communicating with a child's pediatrician may promote the necessary standardized psychological screening and/or follow up of these patients.

摘要

目的

儿童被狗咬伤后可能会产生长期心理影响。我们开展了一项全国性调查,以评估为前往儿科创伤中心就诊的被狗咬伤儿童提供的心理社会干预措施。

方法

对美国的儿科创伤项目管理人员(n = 83)进行了一项包含26个问题的在线调查。该调查询问了各机构是否在急诊科、住院部或门诊环境中为儿科狗咬伤患者提供定向心理社会干预措施以及所采用的干预措施类型。进行描述性统计以展示调查结果。

结果

共有28家美国外科医师学会认证或州级认证的儿科创伤中心回复了调查(n = 28/83,34%)。在回复者中,18家(64.3%)没有任何针对儿科患者狗咬伤心理影响的干预措施。在有干预措施的10家机构(35.7%)中,所提供的心理社会资源类型包括:电子病历中的自动医嘱集、在住院或门诊时评估患者的专业团队、出院时启动的儿童心理转诊、宠物疗法以及创伤复原项目。

结论

大多数接受调查的机构没有针对被狗咬伤儿童心理社会障碍的方案或干预措施。我们提供了本机构的做法示例,即对每一位因狗咬伤入院的儿童自动安排心理会诊。在急诊科对看护者进行教育、为看护者提供区域心理社会资源以及与儿童的儿科医生沟通,可能会促进对这些患者进行必要的标准化心理筛查和/或随访。

相似文献

1
Prevalence of psychosocial interventions for pediatric dog bite injury: Is the bark actually worse than the bite?小儿犬咬伤心理社会干预措施的普及率:吠声真的比咬伤更严重吗?
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2024 Mar 12;17(4):1013-1018. doi: 10.1007/s40653-024-00619-4. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
5
Topical versus systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.用于慢性化脓性中耳炎的局部用抗生素与全身用抗生素对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013053. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013053.pub3.
6
Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints for older people in all long-term care settings.预防和减少所有长期护理环境中老年人使用身体约束的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 28;7(7):CD007546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007546.pub3.
7
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
8
Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 16;6(6):CD011841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011841.pub3.
9
Interventions for patients and caregivers to improve knowledge of sickle cell disease and recognition of its related complications.针对患者及护理人员的干预措施,以提高对镰状细胞病的认识及其相关并发症的识别能力。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 6;10(10):CD011175. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011175.pub2.
10
Psychological therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid substance use disorder.创伤后应激障碍及共病物质使用障碍的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD010204. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010204.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Age- and Sex-Related Differences in Nonfatal Dog Bite Injuries Among Persons Aged 0-19 Treated in Hospital Emergency Departments, United States, 2001-2017.2001-2017 年美国医院急诊部门治疗的 0-19 岁人群中非致命性狗咬伤的年龄和性别差异。
Public Health Rep. 2020 Mar/Apr;135(2):238-244. doi: 10.1177/0033354920904072. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
2
An Epidemiological Analysis of Pediatric Dog Bite Injuries Over a Decade.一项关于儿童犬咬伤的十年流行病学分析。
J Surg Res. 2020 Feb;246:231-235. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.09.013. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
3
Hospitalizations for pediatric dog bite injuries in the United States.美国儿童狗咬伤住院治疗情况。
J Pediatr Surg. 2020 Jul;55(7):1228-1233. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.06.025. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
4
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
5
Scoping decades of dog evidence: a scoping review of dog bite-related sequelae.探究数十年的犬类证据:犬咬伤相关后遗症的范围综述。
Can J Public Health. 2019 Jun;110(3):364-375. doi: 10.17269/s41997-018-0145-3. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
6
Systematic review of pediatric health outcomes associated with childhood adversity.与童年逆境相关的儿童健康结局的系统评价。
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Feb 23;18(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1037-7.
7
Comparison of Antibiotic Therapy and Appendectomy for Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis in Children: A Meta-analysis.儿童急性单纯性阑尾炎抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术的比较:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 May 1;171(5):426-434. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.0057.
8
Pediatric dog bite victims: a need for a continuum of care.儿童犬咬伤受害者:需要持续的护理。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2012 May;51(5):473-7. doi: 10.1177/0009922811435504. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
9
Investigation of posttraumatic stress disorder in children after animal-induced injury in China.中国动物致伤后儿童创伤后应激障碍的调查。
Pediatrics. 2010 Aug;126(2):e320-4. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3530. Epub 2010 Jul 12.
10
Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.研究电子数据采集(REDCap)——一种用于提供转化研究信息学支持的元数据驱动方法和工作流程。
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.