• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利希滕斯坦修补术治疗巨大腹股沟阴囊疝:一项回顾性病例对照研究

Lichtenstein repair for giant inguinoscrotal hernia: a retrospective case-control study.

作者信息

Cuihong Jin, Fan Wang, Yingmo Shen

机构信息

Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital MedicalUniversity, Beijing, 100043, China.

出版信息

Hernia. 2024 Dec 17;29(1):48. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03248-w.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-024-03248-w
PMID:39688647
Abstract

PURPOSE

Giant inguinoscrotal hernia (GISH) is a rare condition in high-income regions, and the management presents a significant challenge for surgeons. A retrospective analysis was conducted of a single center's experience in treating GISH by Lichtenstein approach. The objective was to gain insight into the characteristics of GISH and assess the clinical efficacy of the Lichtenstein approach, as well as the degree of improvement in patient quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

Data from consecutive GISH patients who had undergone Lichtenstein repair at our institution from December 2018 to December 2023 were prospectively collected. The control group for the 1:2 matched case-control study was selected from pure inguinal hernia patients who underwent Lichtenstein repair during the same period. The demographics and surgical characteristics were analyzed. QoL and surgical satisfaction were respectively evaluated using the Carolina Comfort Scale and Numerical Rating Scale.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients with GISH who underwent Lichtenstein repair were identified, and 102 patients with a pure inguinal hernia who underwent Lichtenstein repair were included in the control group. Patients in the GISH group exhibited a higher BMI than those in the control group; they also had a significantly longer hernia duration and a higher incidence of irreducible bulge. Additionally, the GISH patients had significantly higher ASA scores. All the Lichtenstein procedures were uneventful. There were more additional surgical procedures in GISH group, including hernia sac resection in 50 patients (98%) and adhesion release in 23 patients (45.1%). Five patients with GISH underwent omentectomy and one patient underwent testicular resection due to severe adhesions. The GISH group exhibited a higher incidence of postoperative complications. Five patients experienced urinary retention, and one intestinal obstruction. Two patients underwent surgical drainage under local anesthesia at one month postoperatively and made a full recovery. At six months postoperatively, the mean CCS score for the patients was 0.5 ± 0.8, with 21 patients (20.6%) scoring ≥ 2 out of the 23 categories. The results of the surgical satisfaction survey indicated that 130 patients (85.0%) gave a score of 5, reflecting high levels of satisfaction after Lichtenstein hernioplasty.

CONCLUSION

Patients with GISH typically have a long medical history, a high proportion of irreducible masses, and severe comorbidities, making surgery challenging. However, Lichtenstein repair remains a feasible and safe with high patient satisfaction and improved postoperative quality of life.

摘要

目的

巨大腹股沟阴囊疝(GISH)在高收入地区是一种罕见疾病,其治疗对外科医生而言是一项重大挑战。本研究对单中心采用利氏修补术治疗GISH的经验进行回顾性分析。目的是深入了解GISH的特征,评估利氏修补术的临床疗效以及患者生活质量(QoL)的改善程度。

方法

前瞻性收集2018年12月至2023年12月在本机构接受利氏修补术的连续性GISH患者的数据。1:2匹配病例对照研究的对照组选自同期接受利氏修补术的单纯腹股沟疝患者。分析人口统计学和手术特征。分别使用卡罗莱纳舒适度量表和数字评分量表评估QoL和手术满意度。

结果

共确定51例接受利氏修补术的GISH患者,对照组纳入102例接受利氏修补术的单纯腹股沟疝患者。GISH组患者的BMI高于对照组;他们的疝病程也明显更长,不可复性肿块的发生率更高。此外,GISH患者的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分明显更高。所有利氏手术均顺利完成。GISH组有更多的附加手术,包括50例(98%)疝囊切除术和23例(45.1%)粘连松解术。5例GISH患者因严重粘连接受大网膜切除术,1例患者接受睾丸切除术。GISH组术后并发症发生率更高。5例患者出现尿潴留,1例出现肠梗阻。2例患者在术后1个月接受局部麻醉下的手术引流,完全康复。术后6个月,患者的平均CCS评分为0.5±0.8,23个类别中有21例患者(20.6%)得分≥2分。手术满意度调查结果显示,130例患者(85.0%)给出5分,表明利氏疝修补术后患者满意度较高。

结论

GISH患者通常病史较长,不可复性肿块比例高,合并症严重,手术具有挑战性。然而,利氏修补术仍然是可行且安全的,患者满意度高,术后生活质量得到改善。

相似文献

1
Lichtenstein repair for giant inguinoscrotal hernia: a retrospective case-control study.利希滕斯坦修补术治疗巨大腹股沟阴囊疝:一项回顾性病例对照研究
Hernia. 2024 Dec 17;29(1):48. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03248-w.
2
International guidelines for groin hernia management.腹股沟疝治疗的国际指南。
Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
3
Self-adhesive mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Experience of a single center.用于李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术的自粘补片。单中心经验。
Minerva Chir. 2014 Jun;69(3):167-76. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
4
Randomized clinical trial of total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty vs Lichtenstein repair: a long-term follow-up study.完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术与Lichtenstein修补术的随机临床试验:一项长期随访研究
Arch Surg. 2012 Mar;147(3):256-60. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.2023.
5
Totally extraperitoneal repair under general anesthesia versus Lichtenstein repair under local anesthesia for unilateral inguinal hernia: a prospective randomized controlled trial.全身麻醉下完全腹膜外修补术与局部麻醉下李金斯坦修补术治疗单侧腹股沟疝的前瞻性随机对照试验
Surg Endosc. 2014 Mar;28(3):996-1002. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3269-9. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
6
Bilateral inguinal hernia repair and male fertility: a randomized clinical trial comparing Lichtenstein versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) technique.双侧腹股沟疝修补术和男性生育能力:一项比较开放式经腹股沟腹膜前修补术(Lichtenstein)与腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前修补术(TAPP)技术的随机临床试验。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9263-9274. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10499-8. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
7
Modified Lichtenstein hernioplasty with concomitant tissue repair: a retrospective study on postoperative chronic pain.改良的 Lichtenstein 疝修补术联合组织修复:术后慢性疼痛的回顾性研究。
BMC Surg. 2024 Aug 5;24(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02513-0.
8
Open inguinal hernioplasty under local, spinal and general anaesthesia: a comparative study.局部麻醉、脊髓麻醉和全身麻醉下的开放式腹股沟疝修补术:一项对比研究
Hernia. 2025 Mar 17;29(1):121. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03295-x.
9
A Comparison of Outcomes between Lichtenstein and Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia.李金斯坦手术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的疗效比较
Am Surg. 2018 Nov 1;84(11):1774-1780.
10
[Operative strategy and short-term efficacy of recurrent groin hernia].[复发性腹股沟疝的手术策略及短期疗效]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jul 25;21(7):761-765.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-Arm Registry-Based Comparison of Trans-Inguinal-Pre-Peritoneal, Laparoscopic, and Lichtenstein Techniques for Scrotal Hernia Repair.基于三项登记研究的经腹股沟腹膜前修补术、腹腔镜修补术和李金斯坦修补术治疗阴囊疝的比较
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Jul 29;4:13993. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.13993. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Giant inguinal hernia repair using standard transverse inguinal incision with mesh. A retrospective case control study.采用标准经腹股沟切口和网片修补巨大腹股沟疝。一项回顾性病例对照研究。
BMC Surg. 2023 Jun 27;23(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02084-6.
2
Repair of a giant inguinoscrotal hernia with herniation of the ileum and sigmoid colon: A case report.巨大腹股沟阴囊疝伴回肠和乙状结肠疝出的修复:一例报告
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Jan 16;11(2):401-407. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i2.401.
3
Single stage repair of a giant inguinoscrotal hernia by a combined laparotomy and inguinal approach.
经腹腹股沟联合入路一期修复巨大腹股沟疝。
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Oct;91(10):2201-2202. doi: 10.1111/ans.17189. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
4
Giant sliding inguinal hernia requiring intraoperative aspiration of fluid: a case report and literature review.巨大滑动性腹股沟疝术中需抽吸液体:一例报告及文献综述
J Surg Case Rep. 2021 Aug 26;2021(8):rjab340. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjab340. eCollection 2021 Aug.
5
Giant Sliding Inguinoscrotal Hernia Causing Megaureter and Large Bowel Obstruction.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Jun;25(6):1633-1634. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04894-y. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
6
Transinguinal preperitoneal repair of giant inguinoscrotal hernias using Kugel mesh.经腹股沟腹膜前修补术(Kugel 补片)治疗巨大腹股沟-阴囊疝。
J Visc Surg. 2020 Oct;157(5):372-377. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2020.01.007. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
7
Minimally Invasive Multidisciplinary Approach to Chronic Giant Inguinoscrotal Hernias.慢性巨大腹股沟阴囊疝的微创多学科治疗方法
Surg Innov. 2019 Aug;26(4):427-431. doi: 10.1177/1553350619828888. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
8
Emergency inguinal hernia repair under local anesthesia: a 5-year experience in a teaching hospital.局部麻醉下急诊腹股沟疝修补术:一家教学医院的5年经验
BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Mar 19;16:17. doi: 10.1186/s12871-016-0185-2.
9
Giant inguinal hernia: the challenging hug technique.巨大腹股沟疝:具有挑战性的环抱技术。
Hernia. 2015 Oct;19(5):775-83. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1324-7. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
10
Giant inguinal hernia: Report of a case and reviews of surgical techniques.巨大腹股沟疝:一例报告及手术技术综述
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2014;5(11):868-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.10.042. Epub 2014 Oct 18.