• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国中大西洋地区四个国家公园的草原管理方式不同,蜜蜂栖息地各异,但蜜蜂群落结构并无差异。

Bee Habitat, but Not Bee Community Structure, Varies Across Grassland Management in Four National Parks in the Mid-Atlantic, USA.

作者信息

Larson Diane L, Simanonok Michael, Landsman Andrew, Larson Jennifer L, Davies Cora, Otto Clint R V

机构信息

U.S. Geological Survey Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Jamestown North Dakota USA.

National Park Service Chesapeake & Ohio Canal National Historical Park - CHOH Williamsport Maryland USA.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2024 Dec 17;14(12):e70719. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70719. eCollection 2024 Dec.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.70719
PMID:39691441
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11651712/
Abstract

National Park Service units in the United States play a large role in providing habitat for native pollinators. In parks that are established to preserve cultural landscapes, park managers recognize an opportunity to improve pollinator habitat while maintaining historically accurate conditions. In this study, we document floral resources and native bees within managed park grasslands, with the goal of providing information to managers to help them maximize pollinator habitat while meeting other management objectives. The study was performed on 37 grassland properties in the mid-Atlantic region of the eastern United States, distributed across four parks; each property was managed with one of three management types: cool-season hayed, cool-season pasture, or warm-season meadows managed with multiple approaches. We surveyed bees and open flowers on 50-m transects twice each year in 2021 and 2022. Repeated-measures ANOVA models revealed that mean bee abundance, richness, evenness, and diversity did not vary among sites or management types. This finding was further supported by a principal coordinates analysis that showed that bee community composition was similar across management types. Nonetheless, we found evidence to indicate that the three management types did not produce equivalent habitat for bees. Species accumulation curves showed that the effective number of flower species was consistently lower in cool-season pastures, relative to the other two management types. Furthermore, we detected positive correlations between bee and flower diversity metrics in one of the 2 years, indicating that floral metrics are associated with bee communities, at least under certain conditions. Collectively, our study suggests that cool-season fields that are hayed and warm-season meadows have higher floral diversity than cool-season pastures within national park units of the mid-Atlantic region, and this higher diversity of forbs has the potential to benefit native bee diversity.

摘要

美国国家公园管理局的各单位在为本土传粉者提供栖息地方面发挥着重要作用。在那些为保护文化景观而设立的公园中,公园管理者认识到在维持历史准确风貌的同时改善传粉者栖息地的机会。在本研究中,我们记录了管理的公园草地内的花卉资源和本土蜜蜂,目的是向管理者提供信息,帮助他们在实现其他管理目标的同时最大限度地增加传粉者栖息地。该研究在美国东部中大西洋地区的37处草地进行,分布在四个公园;每个地块采用三种管理类型之一进行管理:冷季割草、冷季放牧或采用多种方法管理的暖季草地。我们在2021年和2022年每年两次在50米长的样带上调查蜜蜂和开放花朵。重复测量方差分析模型显示,蜜蜂的平均丰度、丰富度、均匀度和多样性在不同地点或管理类型之间没有差异。主坐标分析进一步支持了这一发现,该分析表明不同管理类型的蜜蜂群落组成相似。尽管如此,我们发现有证据表明这三种管理类型并没有为蜜蜂产生同等的栖息地。物种累积曲线表明,相对于其他两种管理类型,冷季牧场的花卉物种有效数量一直较低。此外,我们在两年中的一年检测到蜜蜂和花卉多样性指标之间存在正相关,表明花卉指标与蜜蜂群落相关,至少在某些条件下是这样。总体而言,我们的研究表明,在中大西洋地区的国家公园单位内,冷季割草地和暖季草地的花卉多样性高于冷季牧场,而这种更高的草本植物多样性有可能使本土蜜蜂多样性受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af0/11651712/9d0008c2e6fe/ECE3-14-e70719-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af0/11651712/0b3e85001c3f/ECE3-14-e70719-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af0/11651712/1c0159d57eca/ECE3-14-e70719-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af0/11651712/34848d8e8543/ECE3-14-e70719-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af0/11651712/c4dc7d3b0947/ECE3-14-e70719-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af0/11651712/9d0008c2e6fe/ECE3-14-e70719-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af0/11651712/0b3e85001c3f/ECE3-14-e70719-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af0/11651712/1c0159d57eca/ECE3-14-e70719-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af0/11651712/34848d8e8543/ECE3-14-e70719-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af0/11651712/c4dc7d3b0947/ECE3-14-e70719-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af0/11651712/9d0008c2e6fe/ECE3-14-e70719-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Bee Habitat, but Not Bee Community Structure, Varies Across Grassland Management in Four National Parks in the Mid-Atlantic, USA.美国中大西洋地区四个国家公园的草原管理方式不同,蜜蜂栖息地各异,但蜜蜂群落结构并无差异。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Dec 17;14(12):e70719. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70719. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Cattle and sheep differentially alter floral resources and the native bee communities in working landscapes.牛羊在耕作景观中对花卉资源和本地蜜蜂群落产生不同的影响。
Ecol Appl. 2021 Oct;31(7):e02406. doi: 10.1002/eap.2406. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
3
Multi-scalar drivers of biodiversity: local management mediates wild bee community response to regional urbanization.生物多样性的多尺度驱动因素:当地管理调节野生蜜蜂群落对区域城市化的响应。
Ecol Appl. 2019 Apr;29(3):e01869. doi: 10.1002/eap.1869. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
4
Patch utilization and flower visitations by wild bees in a honey bee-dominated, grassland landscape.在以蜜蜂为主导的草原景观中野生蜜蜂对斑块的利用及访花情况
Ecol Evol. 2021 Oct 10;11(21):14888-14904. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8174. eCollection 2021 Nov.
5
Limited phenological and dietary overlap between bee communities in spring flowering crops and herbaceous enhancements.在春季开花作物和草本植物增补中,蜜蜂群落的物候和食性重叠有限。
Ecol Appl. 2018 Oct;28(7):1924-1934. doi: 10.1002/eap.1789. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
6
Harvesting effects on wild bee communities in bioenergy grasslands depend on nesting guild.生物能源草地中对野生蜜蜂群落的收获效应取决于筑巢群体。
Ecol Appl. 2019 Mar;29(2):e01828. doi: 10.1002/eap.1828. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
7
B.Y.O. Bees: Managing wild bee biodiversity in urban greenspaces.自带蜜蜂:在城市绿地中管理野生蜜蜂的生物多样性。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 26;18(4):e0281468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281468. eCollection 2023.
8
Livestock grazing is associated with seasonal reduction in pollinator biodiversity and functional dispersion but cheatgrass invasion is not: Variation in bee assemblages in a multi-use shortgrass prairie.家畜放牧与传粉媒介生物多样性和功能分散的季节性减少有关,但并非与冰草入侵有关:多用途矮草原蜜蜂组合的变化。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 17;15(12):e0237484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237484. eCollection 2020.
9
Evaluating Native Bee Communities and Nutrition in Managed Grasslands.评估人工管理草原中的本地蜜蜂群落与营养状况。
Environ Entomol. 2020 Jun 13;49(3):717-725. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvaa009.
10
Biodiversity measures of a grassland plant-pollinator community are resilient to the introduction of honey bees (Apis mellifera).草原植物-传粉者群落的生物多样性措施对引入的蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)具有弹性。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 25;19(10):e0309939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309939. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Fewer bowl traps and more hand netting can increase effective number of bee species and reduce excessive captures.减少碗式诱捕器的使用并增加手工捕网的使用,可以增加蜜蜂物种的有效数量并减少过度捕获。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Feb 26;14(2):e11036. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11036. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Bloom evenness modulates the influence of bloom abundance on insect community structure in suburban gardens.花朵均匀度调节着花朵丰富度对郊区花园昆虫群落结构的影响。
PeerJ. 2021 Apr 22;9:e11132. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11132. eCollection 2021.
3
Coflowering invasive plants and a congener have neutral effects on fitness components of a rare endemic plant.
同时开花的入侵植物和一种同属植物对一种珍稀特有植物的适合度组分具有中性影响。
Ecol Evol. 2021 Mar 20;11(9):4750-4762. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7375. eCollection 2021 May.
4
Landscape Context Influences the Bee Conservation Value of Wildflower Plantings.景观背景影响野花种植的蜜蜂保护价值。
Environ Entomol. 2021 Aug 12;50(4):821-831. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvab036.
5
Urban fragmentation leads to lower floral diversity, with knock-on impacts on bee biodiversity.城市破碎化导致花卉多样性降低,进而对蜜蜂生物多样性产生连锁影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 10;10(1):21756. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78736-x.
6
Relative effects of anthropogenic pressures, climate, and sampling design on the structure of pollination networks at the global scale.人为压力、气候和采样设计对全球授粉网络结构的相对影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Mar;27(6):1266-1280. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15474. Epub 2020 Dec 27.
7
Insect Declines in the Anthropocene.人类世的昆虫衰落。
Annu Rev Entomol. 2020 Jan 7;65:457-480. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025151. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
8
The insect apocalypse, and why it matters.昆虫末日,以及为何这很重要。
Curr Biol. 2019 Oct 7;29(19):R967-R971. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.069.
9
Plant species dominance increases pollination complementarity and plant reproductive function.植物物种优势度增加传粉互补性和植物生殖功能。
Ecology. 2019 Sep;100(9):e02749. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2749. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
10
Ecological filtering in scrub fragments restructures the taxonomic and functional composition of native bee assemblages.灌丛斑块中的生态过滤作用改变了本地蜜蜂类群的分类和功能组成。
Ecology. 2019 May;100(5):e02654. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2654. Epub 2019 Apr 3.