• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Methodological Challenges for the Responsible Use of AI in Systematic Reviews: Risk of Bias Assessment.

作者信息

Maleki Farzad, Karami Manoochehr

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Environmental and Occupational Hazards Control Research Center, Research Institute for Health Sciences and Environment, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Evid Based Med. 2024 Dec;17(4):712-713. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12665. Epub 2024 Dec 18.

DOI:10.1111/jebm.12665
PMID:39692185
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Methodological Challenges for the Responsible Use of AI in Systematic Reviews: Risk of Bias Assessment.系统评价中负责任使用人工智能的方法学挑战：偏倚风险评估
J Evid Based Med. 2024 Dec;17(4):712-713. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12665. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
2
Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.摘要分析方法有助于筛选银屑病干预措施中方法学质量低和偏倚风险高的系统评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Dec 29;17(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0460-z.
3
Artificial Intelligence in Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.人工智能在头颈部肿瘤中的应用：系统评价的系统评价。
Adv Ther. 2023 Aug;40(8):3360-3380. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02527-9. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
4
Ethical Concerns of AI in Neurosurgery: A Systematic Review.神经外科中人工智能的伦理问题：一项系统综述。
Brain Behav. 2025 Feb;15(2):e70333. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70333.
5
Quality assessment standards in artificial intelligence diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews: a meta-research study.人工智能诊断准确性系统评价中的质量评估标准：一项元研究
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Jan 27;5(1):11. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00544-y.
6
Exponential growth of systematic reviews assessing artificial intelligence studies in medicine: challenges and opportunities.医学领域中评估人工智能研究的系统评价呈指数级增长：挑战与机遇并存。
Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 28;11(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01984-7.
7
Methodological and Quality Flaws in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Research: Systematic Review.心理健康研究中人工智能应用的方法学与质量缺陷：系统评价
JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Feb 2;10:e42045. doi: 10.2196/42045.
8
Methodological quality and risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of treatments for peri-implantitis.系统评价治疗种植体周围炎的方法学质量和偏倚风险评估。
J Periodontal Res. 2019 Aug;54(4):374-387. doi: 10.1111/jre.12638. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
9
Artificial intelligence and its impact on the domains of universal health coverage, health emergencies and health promotion: An overview of systematic reviews.人工智能及其对全民健康覆盖、卫生应急和健康促进领域的影响：系统评价概述。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Oct;166:104855. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104855. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
10
Artificial intelligence in clinical medicine: a state-of-the-art overview of systematic reviews with methodological recommendations for improved reporting.临床医学中的人工智能：系统评价的最新综述及改进报告的方法学建议
Front Digit Health. 2025 Mar 5;7:1550731. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1550731. eCollection 2025.

引用本文的文献

1
Variability and Advancements in ChatGPT Risk of Bias Assessments: A Replication and Comparative Analysis.ChatGPT偏倚风险评估的变异性与进展：一项复制与比较分析
J Evid Based Med. 2025 Jun;18(2):e70046. doi: 10.1111/jebm.70046.