Yobs A R, Swanson R A, Lamotte L C
Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Feb;65(2):235-44.
Variation in clinical cytology diagnoses was examined at the microscope and in the cytology laboratory as a unit. Results provide preliminary information about the comparability of cytologic diagnosis under specified conditions. In onsite proficiency testing using "normed" smears with a wide range of findings, 814 individual cytotechnologists and cytopathologists from 306 laboratories in 44 states made the target diagnosis in 63.8% of 8929 cases. False negative diagnoses were made in 7.5% of 4520 smears with moderate dysplasia through frank malignancy, and false positive diagnoses were recorded in 8.9% of 3808 smears with no more than benign atypia. Evaluation of a sample of actual work output from two laboratories showed 3.2 to 3.4% false positive and 4.8 to 11.2% false negative diagnoses on the cases rescreened.
作为一个整体,在显微镜下和细胞实验室中检查临床细胞学诊断的差异。结果提供了关于特定条件下细胞学诊断可比性的初步信息。在使用具有广泛检查结果的“标准化”涂片进行现场能力测试时,来自44个州306个实验室的814名个体细胞技术人员和细胞病理学家在8929例病例中,有63.8%做出了目标诊断。在4520例从中度发育异常到明显恶性肿瘤的涂片中,7.5%的涂片做出了假阴性诊断,在3808例不超过良性异型性的涂片中,8.9%的涂片记录为假阳性诊断。对两个实验室实际工作产出样本的评估显示,在重新筛查的病例中,假阳性诊断率为3.2%至3.4%,假阴性诊断率为4.8%至11.2%。