Sharawat Indar Kumar, Dawman Lesa, Panda Pragnya, Panda Prateek Kumar
Pediatric Neurology Division, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, 249203, India.
Department of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Dec 18;184(1):89. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05926-4.
A number of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted comparing the efficacy of piracetam with placebo and other medications in children with breath-holding spells (BHS). However, no systematic review has yet collated all this evidence. All RCTs comparing the efficacy and/or safety of piracetam with placebo or other medications in children with BHS were included. The pooled estimates were compared for the number of participants with a favorable response, the change in monthly frequency of BHS, compliance, and adverse effects in both groups. The ROB 2.0 tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and the GRADE system was used to determine the certainty of the collated evidence. We included 5 RCTs (437 participants) in the review. Piracetam group had significantly more participants with favorable responses at 1, 2 and 3 months after randomization, as compared to placebo group (RR: 6.5 (95% CI-1.8-23.2), I2 = 75%, p = 0.004, RR: 4.7 (95% CI-3.3-6.7), I2 = 49%, p < 0.0001, RR: 5.4 (95% CI-3.4-8.5), I2 = 0%, p < 0.0001 respectively). Number of participants with complete response or total cessation of attacks was more in the piracetam group compared to placebo (RR: 5.7 (95% CI-1.4-23.2), I2 = 88%, p = 0.01). Change in the average number of BHS was significantly more in the piracetam group, as compared to the placebo group (mean difference-4.9 (95% CI-0.7-9.0), I2 = 99%, p = 0.02). Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse effects were comparable in both piracetam and placebo groups (RR: 1.9 (95% CI-0.5-7.6), I = 0%, p = 0.33). Conclusion: Oral piracetam is efficacious and safe in children with BHS, and its efficacy may further increase by co-administration of oral docosahexaenoic acid. What is known? • Breath-holding spells (BHS) are a common pediatric condition, affecting 0.1% to 4.6% of otherwise healthy children. • Several studies have investigated the efficacy of piracetam in reducing the frequency and severity of BHS, with mixed results. What is new? • Oral piracetam is efficacious and safe in children with BHS. • Its efficacy is further increased by co-administration of oral docosahexaenoic acid.
已经进行了多项随机对照试验(RCT),比较了吡拉西坦与安慰剂及其他药物对屏气发作(BHS)儿童的疗效。然而,尚未有系统评价整理所有这些证据。纳入了所有比较吡拉西坦与安慰剂或其他药物对BHS儿童的疗效和/或安全性的随机对照试验。比较了两组中反应良好的参与者数量、BHS每月发作频率的变化、依从性和不良反应的合并估计值。使用ROB 2.0工具评估偏倚风险,并使用GRADE系统确定整理证据的确定性。我们在综述中纳入了5项随机对照试验(437名参与者)。与安慰剂组相比,吡拉西坦组在随机分组后1、2和3个月时反应良好的参与者明显更多(相对危险度:6.5(95%置信区间-1.8-23.2),I² = 75%,p = 0.004;相对危险度:4.7(95%置信区间-3.3-6.7),I² = 49%,p < 0.0001;相对危险度:5.4(95%置信区间-3.4-8.5),I² = 0%,p < 0.0001)。与安慰剂组相比,吡拉西坦组完全缓解或发作完全停止的参与者数量更多(相对危险度:5.7(95%置信区间-1.4-23.2),I² = 88%,p = 0.01)。与安慰剂组相比,吡拉西坦组BHS平均发作次数的变化明显更大(平均差值-4.9(95%置信区间-0.7-9.0),I² = 99%,p = 0.02)。吡拉西坦组和安慰剂组中出现治疗中出现的不良反应的参与者数量相当(相对危险度:1.9(95%置信区间-0.5-7.6),I = 0%,p = 0.