• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性对分子乳腺成像的看法:一项定性研究。

Women's perspectives of molecular breast imaging: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Elliott Helen, Allen A Joy, Forester Nerys D, Graziadio Sara, Jones W S, Lendrem Beverley Clare, Pearce Mark S, Powell Timothy, Scott Jason, Bray Alison

机构信息

Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2025 Feb;132(3):276-282. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02930-1. Epub 2024 Dec 18.

DOI:10.1038/s41416-024-02930-1
PMID:39695334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11790831/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mammography has poor sensitivity in dense breast tissue. Retrospective studies suggest that Molecular Breast Imaging (MBI), has superior diagnostic accuracy to mammography in women with very dense breast tissue. Women's perspectives of MBI are unknown, but are crucial to understanding the feasibility of, and routes to, adoption into practice.

METHOD

Semi-structured interviews with screened and unscreened women explored acceptability of MBI. Data were analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Four themes were generated from nineteen interviews: (1) presumed negative aspects of MBI are acceptable (2) convenience of access, (3) comfort in familiarity and (4) need for shared decisions relating to risk. Presumed negative aspects of MBI, such as radiation dose and forty-minute scan time, were acceptable provided there are benefits. Some participants were concerned about equitable access, such as parking. Participants expressed comfort in existing and familiar screening processes. Participants acknowledged that informing women of their breast density may result in increased anxiety, but it was still felt to be important to ensure women are fully informed of the risks and harms of screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Women consider MBI to be an acceptable breast imaging modality. High-quality information enabling informed decision-making is essential.

摘要

背景

乳腺钼靶摄影对致密乳腺组织的敏感性较差。回顾性研究表明,分子乳腺成像(MBI)在乳腺组织非常致密的女性中,诊断准确性优于乳腺钼靶摄影。女性对MBI的看法尚不清楚,但对于理解其应用于临床实践的可行性及途径至关重要。

方法

对已接受筛查和未接受筛查的女性进行半结构式访谈,探讨MBI的可接受性。采用主题分析法对数据进行分析。

结果

通过19次访谈得出四个主题:(1)MBI的假定负面因素是可接受的;(2)就诊便利性;(3)熟悉带来的舒适感;(4)需要就风险进行共同决策。只要有好处,MBI的假定负面因素,如辐射剂量和40分钟的扫描时间,都是可以接受的。一些参与者担心能否公平获得服务,如停车问题。参与者对现有的和熟悉的筛查流程表示安心。参与者承认,告知女性其乳腺密度可能会增加焦虑,但仍认为确保女性充分了解筛查的风险和危害很重要。

结论

女性认为MBI是一种可接受的乳腺成像方式。提供高质量信息以实现知情决策至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad29/11790831/3f15e3c5059a/41416_2024_2930_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad29/11790831/3f15e3c5059a/41416_2024_2930_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad29/11790831/3f15e3c5059a/41416_2024_2930_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Women's perspectives of molecular breast imaging: a qualitative study.女性对分子乳腺成像的看法:一项定性研究。
Br J Cancer. 2025 Feb;132(3):276-282. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02930-1. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
2
Supplemental Screening as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in People With Dense Breasts: A Health Technology Assessment.致密型乳腺人群乳腺癌筛查中补充性筛查作为乳腺 X 线摄影的辅助手段:卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2023 Dec 19;23(9):1-293. eCollection 2023.
3
Journal club: molecular breast imaging at reduced radiation dose for supplemental screening in mammographically dense breasts.期刊俱乐部:低辐射剂量分子乳腺成像用于乳腺致密型乳房的补充筛查
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Feb;204(2):241-51. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13357.
4
A Qualitative Study of Spanish-Speakers' Experience with Dense Breast Notifications in a Massachusetts Safety-Net Hospital.一项在马萨诸塞州医疗服务提供系统医院中针对西班牙语使用者接受致密型乳腺组织通知的体验的定性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Feb;34(2):198-205. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4709-y. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
5
How Do Women View Risk-Based Mammography Screening? A Qualitative Study.女性如何看待基于风险的乳房 X 光筛查?一项定性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Nov;33(11):1905-1912. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4601-9. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
6
Informed choices for some, but not for others: An exploration of Australian midlife women's participation in mammography screening by social class.对一些人是明智的选择,对另一些人则不然:按社会阶层对澳大利亚中年女性参与乳房X光检查筛查情况的一项探究。
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057241305730. doi: 10.1177/17455057241305730.
7
Perception of Breast Density Information Among Women in Miami, FL: a Qualitative Study.迈阿密,佛罗里达州女性对乳房密度信息的感知:一项定性研究。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Feb;37(1):188-195. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01778-2.
8
How social class shapes breast cancer risk perspectives and prevention practices of Australian midlife women: a qualitative study using the concept of 'breast cancer candidacy'.社会阶层如何塑造澳大利亚中年女性的乳腺癌风险认知和预防行为:一项使用“乳腺癌候选”概念的定性研究
BMC Cancer. 2024 Oct 21;24(1):1295. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13054-3.
9
"You probably can't feel as safe as normal women": Hispanic women's reactions to breast density notification.“你可能无法像正常女性一样感到安全”:西班牙裔女性对乳腺密度通知的反应。
Cancer. 2019 Jun 15;125(12):2049-2056. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32002. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
10
Perspectives on mammography after receipt of secondary screening owing to a false positive.因假阳性而接受二次筛查后的乳房 X 光摄影检查的看法。
Womens Health Issues. 2015 Mar-Apr;25(2):128-33. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.11.003. Epub 2015 Jan 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Poverty proofing healthcare: A qualitative study of barriers to accessing healthcare for low-income families with children in northern England.实现医疗保健脱贫:英格兰北部有子女的低收入家庭获得医疗保健服务障碍的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 26;19(4):e0292983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292983. eCollection 2024.
2
Current pressure on the UK imaging workforce deters imaging research in the NHS and requires urgent attention.当前英国影像工作人员面临的压力阻碍了国民保健署的影像研究,急需得到关注。
Clin Radiol. 2022 Dec;77(12):913-919. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2022.07.015. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
3
"There is nothing better than participating in this study": Living the PAPAartis cardiovascular randomised controlled trial.
“没有什么比参与这项研究更好的了”:亲历PAPAartis心血管随机对照试验。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2022 Sep 3;29:100987. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100987. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
Breast cancer screening in women with extremely dense breasts recommendations of the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI).欧洲乳腺影像学会(EUSOBI)关于致密型乳腺女性乳腺癌筛查的建议。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Jun;32(6):4036-4045. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08617-6. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
5
Benefits and Risks of Mammography Screening in Women Ages 40 to 49 Years.40 至 49 岁女性乳房 X 光筛查的益处和风险。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501327211058322. doi: 10.1177/21501327211058322.
6
Financial incentives for breast cancer screening undermine informed choice.乳腺癌筛查的经济激励措施会破坏知情选择。
BMJ. 2022 Jan 10;376:e065726. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-065726.
7
Breast Density Awareness and Knowledge in a Mammography Screening Cohort of Predominantly Hispanic Women: Does Breast Density Notification Matter?乳腺密度认知与知识在以西班牙裔女性为主的乳腺 X 光筛查队列中的体现:乳腺密度通知是否重要?
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 Oct;30(10):1913-1920. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0172. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
8
Breast cancer risk status influences uptake, retention and efficacy of a weight loss programme amongst breast cancer screening attendees: two randomised controlled feasibility trials.乳腺癌风险状况影响着乳腺癌筛查参与者对减肥计划的参与、坚持和效果:两项随机对照可行性试验。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Dec 4;19(1):1089. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6279-8.
9
Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography.乳腺体积密度会影响数字化乳腺筛查钼靶摄影的效果。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Feb;162(1):95-103. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-4090-7. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
10
Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power.定性访谈研究中的样本量:以信息力为导向
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444. Epub 2016 Jul 10.