Julianingsih Dita, Alvarado-Martinez Zabdiel, Tabashsum Zajeba, Tung Chuan-Wei, Aditya Arpita, Kapadia Sarika, Maskey Saloni, Mohapatra Aditi, Biswas Debabrata
Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Biological Sciences Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Access Microbiol. 2024 Sep 30;6(9). doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000775.v6. eCollection 2024.
Due to consumer demand, many conventional poultry farms are now growing poultry without antibiotics or synthetic chemicals. In addition to this, pasture/organic poultry farms have increased significantly in the USA, and they are also antibiotic- and chemical-free. According to recent reports, both antibiotic-free conventional and pasture poultry farmers are facing the re-emergence of bacterial diseases. Bacterial diseases cause higher mortality rates in birds and lead to non-profitable poultry farming. This study investigated the prevalence of subsp. serovar Gallinarum biovars Gallinarum (. Gallinarum), the causative agent of fowl typhoid, and subsp. serovar Gallinarum biovars Pullorum (. Pullorum), the causative agent of pullorum disease, within integrated crop-livestock/pasture farm environments and their processed products. Specifically, the study focused on both the pre-harvest period, which includes the conditions and practices on the farm before the crops and livestock are harvested, and the post-harvest period, which encompasses the handling, processing, and storage of the products after harvest. A total of 1286 samples were collected from six farms and adjacent 13 markets to determine the prevalence of . Gallinarum and . Pullorum by using both microbiological culture and molecular techniques, specifically PCR. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the agar dilution method for the recommended antibiotics as described in the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). . Pullorum was detected in 11 samples (2.7%), while . Gallinarum was found in six samples (1.5%) out of a total of 403 samples at the pre-harvest level. At the post-harvest level, only . Gallinarum was identified in 14 meat samples out of 883(1.6%) recovered from samples collected from retail markets. Antibiogram showed . Gallinarum and . Pullorum to be highly resistant to cephradine, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, amoxicillin, streptomycin, and ampicillin. This data demonstrates that both . Pullorum and . Gallinarum are commonly present in farm poultry environments as well as the products sold in the markets, which warrants implementation of regular surveillance and monitoring programmes, as well as potentially requiring future control strategies to reduce . Pullorum and . Gallinarum transmission.
由于消费者需求,许多传统家禽养殖场现在养殖家禽时不使用抗生素或合成化学品。除此之外,美国的牧场/有机家禽养殖场数量显著增加,这些养殖场也不使用抗生素和化学品。根据最近的报告,不使用抗生素的传统家禽养殖户和牧场家禽养殖户都面临细菌性疾病再次出现的问题。细菌性疾病导致家禽死亡率更高,并导致家禽养殖无利可图。本研究调查了鸡伤寒病原体鸡亚种鸡血清型鸡生物变种(鸡伤寒沙门氏菌)和鸡白痢病原体鸡亚种鸡血清型鸡生物变种(鸡白痢沙门氏菌)在农牧结合/牧场养殖环境及其加工产品中的流行情况。具体而言,该研究关注收获前阶段,包括作物和牲畜收获前农场的条件和做法,以及收获后阶段,包括收获后产品的处理、加工和储存。从六个农场和相邻的13个市场共采集了1286份样本,通过微生物培养和分子技术(特别是PCR)来确定鸡伤寒沙门氏菌和鸡白痢沙门氏菌的流行情况。按照临床实验室标准协会(CLSI)的描述,使用琼脂稀释法对推荐的抗生素进行药敏试验。在收获前阶段的403份样本中,11份样本(2.7%)检测到鸡白痢沙门氏菌,6份样本(1.5%)检测到鸡伤寒沙门氏菌。在收获后阶段,从零售市场采集的883份样本中的14份肉类样本(1.6%)中仅检测到鸡伤寒沙门氏菌。药敏谱显示鸡伤寒沙门氏菌和鸡白痢沙门氏菌对头孢拉定、甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑、阿莫西林、链霉素和氨苄青霉素高度耐药。这些数据表明,鸡白痢沙门氏菌和鸡伤寒沙门氏菌在农场家禽环境以及市场上销售的产品中普遍存在,这就需要实施定期监测计划,并可能需要未来的控制策略来减少鸡白痢沙门氏菌和鸡伤寒沙门氏菌的传播。