Risk scores for allograft failure: Are they still useful in liver recipients from donation after circulatory death?

BACKGROUND

Liver grafts from donation after circulatory death (DCD) are associated with a higher risk of early graft dysfunction, determined by the warm ischemia and cold ischemia times. It is essential to have precise criteria to identify this complication in order to guide therapeutic strategies.

AIM

To validate different graft and recipient survival scores in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) with DCD grafts.

METHODS

A retrospective and observational unicentric study was conducted on 65 LT patients with grafts obtained from controlled DCD donors from November 2013 to November 2022. The United Kingdom (UK) risk score, early allograft dysfunction (EAD) Olthoff score, and model for early allograft function (MEAF) score were used to evaluate the risk of graft and recipient survival post-transplant. For survival analysis purposes, we used the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences between subgroups were compared using the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were included in the study. The UK risk score did not demonstrate predictive capacity for recipient or graft survival. However, in donors aged over 70 years old (18.4%), it significantly predicted graft survival ( < 0.05). According to Kaplan-Meier survival curves, graft survival rates at 6 months, 2 years, and 5 years in the futility group dramatically decreased to 50% compared to the other groups (log-rank 8.806, < 0.05). The EAD Olthoff and MEAF scores did not demonstrate predictive capacity for recipient or graft survival. Based on Kaplan-Meier survival curves, patients with a MEAF score ≥ 7 had a lower graft survival rate at 6 months, 2 years, and 5 years compared to patients with a lower MEAF score (log-rank 4.667, < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In our series, both UK DCD risk score and MEAF score showed predictive capability for graft survival.