Crepaldi Anna, Piva Giovanni, Lamberti Nicola, Felisatti Michele, Pomidori Luca, Battaglia Yuri, Manfredini Fabio, Storari Alda, López-Soto Pablo Jesús
Unit of Nephrology, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara 44121, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.
Department of Nursing, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba, Cordoba 14004, Andalusia, Spain.
World J Transplant. 2024 Dec 18;14(4):96244. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v14.i4.96244.
Although the benefits of exercise for kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have been widely demonstrated, these patients experience several barriers in undertaking a structured exercise program in hospital and non-hospital facilities.
To compare the effects of a supervised moderate-intensity gym-based intervention with a home-based low-intensity walking program on exercise capacity in KTRs.
KTRs were asked to choose between two six-month programs. The first group performed a low-intensity interval walking intervention at home-based exercise intervention (HBex). The second group performed a supervised training program at an adapted physical activity gym (Sgym), including aerobic and resistance training. The outcomes, collected at baseline and at the end of the programs, included the 6-minute walking test, the peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) during a treadmill test, the 5-time sit-to-stand test, and blood pressure.
Seventeen patients agreed to participate and self-selected into the HBex ( = 9) and Sgym ( = 8) groups. Two patients in the Sgym group dropped out because of familial problems. At baseline, patients in the HBex group were significantly older and had lower walking distance, VO2peak, and lower limb strength. Primary outcome changes were significantly greater in the HBex group than in the Sgym group (52 ± 23 m 8 ± 34; = 0.005). No other significant differences between groups were observed. Both groups improved most of the outcomes in the within-group comparisons, with significant variations in VO2 peak.
Six-month moderate-intensity supervised or low-intensity home-based training programs effectively improved exercise capacity in KTRs. Gym-based programs combine aerobic and resistance training; however, in-home walking may be proposed for frail KTRs.
尽管运动对肾移植受者(KTRs)的益处已得到广泛证实,但这些患者在医院和非医院设施中进行结构化运动计划时仍面临一些障碍。
比较基于健身房的中等强度监督干预与基于家庭的低强度步行计划对KTRs运动能力的影响。
KTRs被要求在两个为期六个月的计划中进行选择。第一组在基于家庭的运动干预(HBex)中进行低强度间歇步行干预。第二组在适应性体育活动健身房(Sgym)进行监督训练计划,包括有氧和阻力训练。在基线和计划结束时收集的结果包括6分钟步行测试、跑步机测试中的峰值耗氧量(VO2peak)、5次坐立测试和血压。
17名患者同意参与并自行选择进入HBex组(n = 9)和Sgym组(n = 8)。Sgym组有2名患者因家庭问题退出。在基线时,HBex组的患者年龄显著更大,步行距离、VO2peak和下肢力量更低。HBex组的主要结局变化显著大于Sgym组(52±23米对8±34米;P = 0.005)。两组之间未观察到其他显著差异。两组在组内比较中大多数结局都有所改善,VO2峰值有显著变化。
为期六个月的中等强度监督或低强度家庭训练计划有效地提高了KTRs的运动能力。基于健身房的计划结合了有氧和阻力训练;然而,对于体弱的KTRs,可建议进行居家步行训练。