Peña Jhonatan C, Sánchez-Guette Lilibeth, Lombo Camilo, Pinto Edith, Collazos Carlos, Tovar Blanca, Bonilla Diego A, Cardozo Luis A, Tellez Luis Andres
Research and Measurement Group in Sports Training, School of Heath and Sport Sciences, Fundación Universitaria del Área Andina, Bogotá 111061, Colombia.
Science and Technologies of Physical Activity and Sport, Universidad Manuela Beltran, Bogotá 110311, Colombia.
Sports (Basel). 2025 May 19;13(5):153. doi: 10.3390/sports13050153.
Resistance training (RT) has been shown to produce beneficial effects, including on quality of life, renal function, physical fitness, and survival rates in kidney transplant for 24 recipients. However, the optimal periodization of load components for this population remains unclear, as no consensus has been established. This study aimed to characterize the load components of RT programs in kidney transplant recipients. A scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The literature search was performed up to October 2024 in MEDLINE/PubMed, the Web of Science Core Collection, SCOPUS, ScienceDirect, and SPORTDiscus. Only studies that included RT as part of the intervention were considered. The RT variables analyzed included intervention duration, weekly frequency, session duration, number and types of exercises, intensity, number of sets, rest time between sets, progressive overload, and execution velocity. A total of 645 studies were identified, of which 15 met the eligibility criteria and were selected for analysis. The primary strategy for intensity control was based on the percentage of one-repetition maximum (%1RM), with training zones ranging from 30% to 80%. The number of sets varied from two to eight, while repetitions ranged from 10 to 20. The rest intervals between sets lasted between one and five minutes. The most highly implemented type of resistance involved the use of dumbbells, body weight, and elastic bands. A high degree of heterogeneity was identified in load periodization parameters, highlighting a lack of consensus in exercise prescription for this population. However, this review established general criteria that can serve as a reference for exercise professionals to develop more structured and effective training programs.
抗阻训练(RT)已被证明能产生有益效果,包括对24名肾移植受者的生活质量、肾功能、体能和生存率。然而,由于尚未达成共识,该人群负荷组成部分的最佳分期仍不清楚。本研究旨在描述肾移植受者抗阻训练计划的负荷组成部分。按照系统评价和Meta分析扩展版的范围综述的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)进行了一项范围综述。截至2024年10月,在MEDLINE/PubMed、科学网核心合集、Scopus、ScienceDirect和SPORTDiscus上进行了文献检索。仅纳入将抗阻训练作为干预措施一部分的研究。分析的抗阻训练变量包括干预持续时间、每周频率、每次训练时长、练习的数量和类型、强度、组数、组间休息时间、渐进性超负荷和执行速度。共确定了645项研究,其中15项符合纳入标准并被选入分析。强度控制的主要策略基于一次重复最大值百分比(%1RM),训练范围为30%至80%。组数从两组到八组不等,而重复次数从10次到20次不等。组间休息时间持续1至5分钟。最常使用的抗阻类型包括哑铃、体重和弹力带。在负荷分期参数中发现了高度异质性,突出表明该人群运动处方缺乏共识。然而,本综述确立了一般标准,可为运动专业人员制定更结构化和有效的训练计划提供参考。