• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Pulmonary Embolism Education: Role of Generative Artificial Intelligence Models.肺栓塞教育:生成式人工智能模型的作用
Mo Med. 2024 Nov-Dec;121(6):495-498.
2
Assessing the quality and readability of patient education materials on chemotherapy cardiotoxicity from artificial intelligence chatbots: An observational cross-sectional study.评估人工智能聊天机器人提供的关于化疗心脏毒性的患者教育材料的质量和可读性:一项观察性横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Apr 11;104(15):e42135. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042135.
3
Generative artificial intelligence chatbots may provide appropriate informational responses to common vascular surgery questions by patients.生成式人工智能聊天机器人可能会为患者关于常见血管外科问题提供恰当的信息性回复。
Vascular. 2025 Feb;33(1):229-237. doi: 10.1177/17085381241240550. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
4
American academy of Orthopedic Surgeons' OrthoInfo provides more readable information regarding meniscus injury than ChatGPT-4 while information accuracy is comparable.美国矫形外科医师学会的OrthoInfo在半月板损伤方面提供了比ChatGPT-4更具可读性的信息,而信息准确性相当。
J ISAKOS. 2025 Apr;11:100843. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2025.100843. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
5
Can generative AI improve the readability of patient education materials at a radiology practice?生成式人工智能能否提高放射科实践中患者教育材料的可读性?
Clin Radiol. 2024 Nov;79(11):e1366-e1371. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2024.08.019. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
6
Readability, quality and accuracy of generative artificial intelligence chatbots for commonly asked questions about labor epidurals: a comparison of ChatGPT and Bard.生成式人工智能聊天机器人针对分娩硬膜外麻醉常见问题的可读性、质量和准确性:ChatGPT与Bard的比较
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2025 Feb;61:104317. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104317. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
7
Artificial intelligence chatbots versus traditional medical resources for patient education on "Labor Epidurals": an evaluation of accuracy, emotional tone, and readability.用于“分娩硬膜外麻醉”患者教育的人工智能聊天机器人与传统医学资源的比较:准确性、情感基调及可读性评估
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2025 Feb;61:104302. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104302. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
8
AI Chatbots as Sources of STD Information: A Study on Reliability and Readability.作为性传播疾病信息来源的人工智能聊天机器人:可靠性与可读性研究
J Med Syst. 2025 Apr 3;49(1):43. doi: 10.1007/s10916-025-02178-z.
9
Proficiency, Clarity, and Objectivity of Large Language Models Versus Specialists' Knowledge on COVID-19's Impacts in Pregnancy: Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.大型语言模型在新冠肺炎对妊娠影响方面的熟练度、清晰度和客观性与专家知识对比:横断面试点研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Feb 5;9:e56126. doi: 10.2196/56126.
10
ChatGPT as a patient education tool in colorectal cancer-An in-depth assessment of efficacy, quality and readability.ChatGPT作为结直肠癌患者教育工具——疗效、质量和可读性的深入评估
Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jan;27(1):e17267. doi: 10.1111/codi.17267. Epub 2024 Dec 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Response accuracy of ChatGPT 3.5 Copilot and Gemini in interpreting biochemical laboratory data a pilot study.ChatGPT 3.5 Copilot 和 Gemini 解读生化实验室数据的反应准确性:一项初步研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 8;14(1):8233. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58964-1.
2
Health Literacy Analytics of Accessible Patient Resources in Cardiovascular Medicine: What are Patients Wanting to Know?心血管医学中可获取患者资源的健康素养分析:患者想了解什么?
Kans J Med. 2023 Dec 31;16(3):309-315. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol16.20554. eCollection 2023.
3
PERT era, race-based healthcare disparities in a large urban safety net hospital.PERT时代,一家大型城市安全网医院中基于种族的医疗保健差异。
Pulm Circ. 2023 Dec 5;13(4):e12318. doi: 10.1002/pul2.12318. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Evaluation of the Performance of Generative AI Large Language Models ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing Chat in Supporting Evidence-Based Dentistry: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.评估生成式 AI 大语言模型 ChatGPT、Google Bard 和 Microsoft Bing Chat 在支持循证牙科方面的性能:比较混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 28;25:e51580. doi: 10.2196/51580.
5
Digital Patient Education on Xanthelasma Palpebrarum: A Content Analysis.睑黄瘤的数字患者教育:内容分析
Clin Pract. 2023 Sep 29;13(5):1207-1214. doi: 10.3390/clinpract13050108.
6
Health literacy in patients with pulmonary embolism: development and validation of the HeLP (Health Literacy in Pulmonary Embolism)-Questionnaire.肺栓塞患者的健康素养:《肺栓塞健康素养问卷》(HeLP)的编制与验证。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 29;11:1167499. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1167499. eCollection 2023.
7
ChatGPT and Generative Artificial Intelligence for Medical Education: Potential Impact and Opportunity.ChatGPT 和生成式人工智能在医学教育中的应用:潜在影响与机遇。
Acad Med. 2024 Jan 1;99(1):22-27. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005439. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
8
Knowledge Levels and Predictors of Venous Thromboembolism among Pregnant Women in Nigeria: A Cross-Sectional Survey for the 'Move for Flow' Programme.尼日利亚孕妇静脉血栓栓塞知识水平及其预测因素:“流动行动”方案的横断面调查。
West Afr J Med. 2023 Aug 28;40(8):799-807.
9
ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns.ChatGPT在医学教育、研究与实践中的应用:对其前景与合理担忧的系统评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 19;11(6):887. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060887.
10
Craniosynostosis: Are Online Resources Readable?颅缝早闭:网络资源可读性如何?
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Jul;61(7):1228-1232. doi: 10.1177/10556656231154843. Epub 2023 Feb 6.

肺栓塞教育:生成式人工智能模型的作用

Pulmonary Embolism Education: Role of Generative Artificial Intelligence Models.

作者信息

Zaidi Rohma, Asghedom Jonathan, Singh Som

机构信息

University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri.

University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri and University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

Mo Med. 2024 Nov-Dec;121(6):495-498.

PMID:39697584
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11651256/
Abstract

The growing use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in the public sphere allows for a greater degree of disseminating information worldwide. For patients, there is a growing body of literature exploring how the generative artificial intelligence models can be used in improving the health literacy of patients, especially in cases of acute pulmonary embolism, where patients require deep, concise understanding of there disease and management. This study measured the readability of the generative responses created by publicly available AI models, and found that ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Microsoft CoPilot do not currently meet the United States readability recommendations. Given the growing use of these models, future investigation on the longitudinal readability measures may help profile how these generative AI models adapt in their deep learning processes.

摘要

生成式人工智能在公共领域的使用日益增加,使得信息在全球范围内的传播程度更高。对于患者而言,越来越多的文献在探索生成式人工智能模型如何用于提高患者的健康素养,尤其是在急性肺栓塞的情况下,患者需要深入、简洁地了解自己的疾病及治疗方法。本研究测量了公开可用的人工智能模型生成的回复的可读性,发现ChatGPT、谷歌Gemini和微软Copilot目前未达到美国的可读性建议。鉴于这些模型的使用日益增加,未来对纵向可读性指标的研究可能有助于了解这些生成式人工智能模型在深度学习过程中的适应性。