Suppr超能文献

非药物疗法对术后认知功能障碍的比较效果:系统评价与网状Meta分析方案

Comparative effectiveness of non-pharmacological therapies for postoperative cognitive dysfunction: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wu Kexin, Bao Qiongnan, Huang Jun, Sun Shanshan, Li Yaqin, Zhang Xinyue, Xia Manze, Chen Zhenghong, Yao Jin, Zhong Wanqi, Yin Zihan, Liang Fanrong

机构信息

Acupuncture and Tuina School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.

Sichuan Provincial Acupuncture Clinical Research Center, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Dec 19;19(12):e0309605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309605. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a common complication following surgery. Electroacupuncture (EA), manual acupuncture (MA), transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS), and cognitive training (CT) can effectively maintain or improve the postoperative cognitive function of patients. However, it remains unclear which therapy is the most effective. Therefore, this network meta-analysis aims to compare and rank the efficacy of these non-pharmacological therapies for POCD to identify the optimal therapy.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A systematic search will be conducted across seven databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, AMED, and PsycINFO) for articles published between January 2000 and November 2023. Two reviewers will independently conduct study selection and data extraction. The primary outcome will be the changes in the overall cognitive function before and after the intervention. The secondary outcome will be the incidence of POCD. The risk of bias will be assessed using the revised Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analyses will be performed using RevMan, STATA, and Aggregate Data Drug Information System statistical software. Additionally, the quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation guidelines. Ethics and dissemination: The results will be disseminated to peer-reviewed journals or conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023454028.

摘要

引言

术后认知功能障碍(POCD)是手术后常见的并发症。电针(EA)、手针(MA)、经皮穴位电刺激(TEAS)和认知训练(CT)可有效维持或改善患者术后的认知功能。然而,哪种治疗方法最有效仍不清楚。因此,本网络荟萃分析旨在比较并排序这些非药物疗法对POCD的疗效,以确定最佳治疗方法。

方法与分析

将在七个数据库(PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、EMBASE、科学网、护理学与健康领域数据库、联合和补充医学数据库以及心理学文摘数据库)中系统检索2000年1月至2023年11月发表的文章。两名评审员将独立进行研究筛选和数据提取。主要结局将是干预前后整体认知功能的变化。次要结局将是POCD的发生率。将使用修订后的偏倚风险评估工具评估偏倚风险。将使用RevMan、STATA和汇总数据药物信息系统统计软件进行成对和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。此外,将使用推荐分级的评估、制定和评价指南评估证据质量。伦理与传播:研究结果将发表在同行评审期刊或会议上。

试验注册

国际前瞻性系统评价注册库注册号:CRD42023454028。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验