Ianni Katherine, Chen Alyssa, Rodrigues Daniela, Hatfield Laura A
Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr;60 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e14419. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14419. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
To demonstrate the use of transportability methods to extend findings from payment model evaluations to groups of historically underserved beneficiaries.
We used a simulation study to transport the effects of the Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+) model to a target population of Black fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries living outside the original 18 CPC+ regions. Our main outcome variable was total Medicare spending per beneficiary per year (pbpy).
We simulated practice-level spending in 18 CPC+ regions and 32 non-CPC+ regions (1200 practices per region). We calibrated the simulation parameters to values from the literature and then varied four key parameters to create 16 realistic simulation scenarios. These scenarios varied the representativeness of practices in CPC+ regions that joined CPC+ (i.e., the sample) relative to the target population by changing the distribution of Black beneficiaries across practices and the distribution of practices across regions. Practices were characterized by their experience with the Medicare Shared Savings Program (SSP) and system/hospital ownership because these are known to modify the effect of CPC+ on spending.
Across the 16 simulation scenarios, transporting the treatment effect of CPC+ to Black FFS beneficiaries in non-CPC+ regions yielded median treatment effects that ranged from $15.5 pbpy smaller to $10 pbpy larger than in the sample. These differences are roughly the same magnitude as the estimated overall effect of $13 pbpy.
The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation has pledged to put equity at the center of its demonstration models. However, offering models in limited geographic areas with voluntary provider participation may result in unrepresentative samples. Naively generalizing CPC+ effects from geographically limited, voluntary samples to all Black FFS beneficiaries could be misleading. Under some circumstances, transportability methods can be used to estimate effects in this target population.
展示如何运用可移植性方法,将支付模式评估的结果推广至历史上服务不足的受益人群体。
我们开展了一项模拟研究,将综合初级保健加强版(CPC+)模式的效果推广至原18个CPC+区域以外的黑人按服务收费(FFS)医疗保险受益目标人群。我们的主要结果变量是每位受益人每年的医疗保险总支出(pbpy)。
我们模拟了18个CPC+区域和32个非CPC+区域(每个区域1200个医疗机构)的机构层面支出情况。我们将模拟参数校准为文献中的值,然后改变四个关键参数,创建16个现实的模拟场景。这些场景通过改变黑人受益人在各医疗机构中的分布以及各区域医疗机构的分布,改变了加入CPC+的CPC+区域内医疗机构(即样本)相对于目标人群的代表性。医疗机构的特征在于其参与医疗保险共享节约计划(SSP)的经验以及系统/医院所有权,因为已知这些因素会改变CPC+对支出的影响。
在16个模拟场景中,将CPC+的治疗效果推广至非CPC+区域的黑人FFS受益人,所产生的中位数治疗效果比样本中的效果小15.5 pbpy至大10 pbpy。这些差异与估计的总体效果13 pbpy大致相同。
医疗保险和医疗补助创新中心已承诺将公平作为其示范模式的核心。然而,在有限地理区域内提供模式且提供者自愿参与可能会导致样本缺乏代表性。将CPC+效果从地理范围有限的自愿样本天真地推广至所有黑人FFS受益人可能会产生误导。在某些情况下,可移植性方法可用于估计该目标人群的效果。