Suppr超能文献

运用双重差分估计法来评估支付与服务提供模式对健康公平性的影响。

Transporting difference-in-differences estimates to assess health equity impacts of payment and delivery models.

作者信息

Ianni Katherine, Chen Alyssa, Rodrigues Daniela, Hatfield Laura A

机构信息

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr;60 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e14419. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14419. Epub 2024 Dec 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the use of transportability methods to extend findings from payment model evaluations to groups of historically underserved beneficiaries.

STUDY SETTING AND DESIGN

We used a simulation study to transport the effects of the Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+) model to a target population of Black fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries living outside the original 18 CPC+ regions. Our main outcome variable was total Medicare spending per beneficiary per year (pbpy).

DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE

We simulated practice-level spending in 18 CPC+ regions and 32 non-CPC+ regions (1200 practices per region). We calibrated the simulation parameters to values from the literature and then varied four key parameters to create 16 realistic simulation scenarios. These scenarios varied the representativeness of practices in CPC+ regions that joined CPC+ (i.e., the sample) relative to the target population by changing the distribution of Black beneficiaries across practices and the distribution of practices across regions. Practices were characterized by their experience with the Medicare Shared Savings Program (SSP) and system/hospital ownership because these are known to modify the effect of CPC+ on spending.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Across the 16 simulation scenarios, transporting the treatment effect of CPC+ to Black FFS beneficiaries in non-CPC+ regions yielded median treatment effects that ranged from $15.5 pbpy smaller to $10 pbpy larger than in the sample. These differences are roughly the same magnitude as the estimated overall effect of $13 pbpy.

CONCLUSIONS

The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation has pledged to put equity at the center of its demonstration models. However, offering models in limited geographic areas with voluntary provider participation may result in unrepresentative samples. Naively generalizing CPC+ effects from geographically limited, voluntary samples to all Black FFS beneficiaries could be misleading. Under some circumstances, transportability methods can be used to estimate effects in this target population.

摘要

目的

展示如何运用可移植性方法,将支付模式评估的结果推广至历史上服务不足的受益人群体。

研究背景与设计

我们开展了一项模拟研究,将综合初级保健加强版(CPC+)模式的效果推广至原18个CPC+区域以外的黑人按服务收费(FFS)医疗保险受益目标人群。我们的主要结果变量是每位受益人每年的医疗保险总支出(pbpy)。

数据来源与分析样本

我们模拟了18个CPC+区域和32个非CPC+区域(每个区域1200个医疗机构)的机构层面支出情况。我们将模拟参数校准为文献中的值,然后改变四个关键参数,创建16个现实的模拟场景。这些场景通过改变黑人受益人在各医疗机构中的分布以及各区域医疗机构的分布,改变了加入CPC+的CPC+区域内医疗机构(即样本)相对于目标人群的代表性。医疗机构的特征在于其参与医疗保险共享节约计划(SSP)的经验以及系统/医院所有权,因为已知这些因素会改变CPC+对支出的影响。

主要发现

在16个模拟场景中,将CPC+的治疗效果推广至非CPC+区域的黑人FFS受益人,所产生的中位数治疗效果比样本中的效果小15.5 pbpy至大10 pbpy。这些差异与估计的总体效果13 pbpy大致相同。

结论

医疗保险和医疗补助创新中心已承诺将公平作为其示范模式的核心。然而,在有限地理区域内提供模式且提供者自愿参与可能会导致样本缺乏代表性。将CPC+效果从地理范围有限的自愿样本天真地推广至所有黑人FFS受益人可能会产生误导。在某些情况下,可移植性方法可用于估计该目标人群的效果。

相似文献

7
Payment methods for outpatient care facilities.门诊护理机构的支付方式。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 3;3(3):CD011153. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011153.pub2.

本文引用的文献

2
Transforming Primary Care Through Innovations in Medicare.通过医疗保险创新转变初级医疗保健。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Dec 1;4(12):e235071. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.5071.
4
Confounding and regression adjustment in difference-in-differences studies.双重差分法中的混杂因素和回归调整。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct;56(5):932-941. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13666. Epub 2021 May 12.
7
Racism and Health: Evidence and Needed Research.种族主义与健康:证据与研究需求。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;40:105-125. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-043750. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
8
Designing Difference in Difference Studies: Best Practices for Public Health Policy Research.设计双重差分研究:公共卫生政策研究的最佳实践。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:453-469. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013507. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
10
Quasi-experimental study designs series-paper 7: assessing the assumptions.准实验研究设计系列论文7:评估假设
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;89:53-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 Mar 29.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验