• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我的背部:与患有长期背部问题的个体共同设计并为其开展市政康复服务:研究方案

My back: co-designing municipal rehabilitation with and for individuals with long-lasting back problems: study protocol.

作者信息

Junge Tina, Kjaer P

机构信息

Health Sciences Research Centre, UCL University College, Niels Bohrs Allé 1, Odense, 5230, Denmark.

Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Dec 19;25(1):1038. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08168-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12891-024-08168-5
PMID:39702067
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11660760/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Denmark, the organization and content of rehabilitation for people with back problems vary by municipality. Furthermore, there is no systematic evaluation of the overall effect and quality of municipal rehabilitation efforts. Since individuals with long-lasting back problems often receive multiple interventions delivered by various professionals, departments, and sectors, a coordinated effort is essential within complex systems, like municipal organizations. Therefore, the Municipality of Svendborg, the University of Southern Denmark, and UCL University College aim to co-design an improved municipal rehabilitation program with and for individuals with back problems, within the existing municipal context. The new practices developed in the program seek to better support individuals to manage everyday life with back problems, develop effective rehabilitation practices, and decrease the associated municipal costs.

METHODS

My Back is a mixed-method research study, utilizing a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to ensure iterative development and continuous improvement of municipal rehabilitation practices. This study is structured into several work packages (WPs) that focus on identifying experiences (WP 1), mapping current practices (WP 2), summarizing relevant literature (WP 3), conducting co-design workshops (WP 4), and the development and implementation of new rehabilitation practices via PDSA cycles (WP 5). These WPs will inform the development and implementation of new rehabilitation practices, which will be evaluated for quality and effectiveness (WP 6), and system-level changes (WP 7), followed by dissemination of results (WP 8).

DISCUSSION

Through a local co-design process involving individuals with back problems, municipal professionals, and leaders, we expect strong relevance and engagement, ensuring successful implementation. The new practices aim to better support people with back problems to manage everyday life through improved rehabilitation and interdisciplinary collaboration among municipal social and health professionals. A platform model for monitoring local rehabilitation will be introduced to evaluate workability and economic implications within the target population. The knowledge and results from this study can be disseminated and adapted to public contexts throughout Denmark and potentially other countries with similar municipal healthcare structures. Sharing best practices and lessons learned from the implementation process can inform rehabilitation practices in different international settings.

摘要

背景

在丹麦,针对背部问题患者的康复组织形式和内容因市政当局而异。此外,对于市政当局康复工作的整体效果和质量,尚无系统评估。由于长期存在背部问题的个体常常接受由不同专业人员、部门和领域提供的多种干预措施,在像市政组织这样的复杂系统中,协同努力至关重要。因此,斯文堡市政当局、南丹麦大学和伦敦大学学院(UCL)的大学学院旨在在现有的市政环境中,与背部问题患者共同设计并为其制定一个改进的市政康复计划。该计划中开发的新做法旨在更好地支持个体应对背部问题的日常生活,制定有效的康复措施,并降低相关的市政成本。

方法

“我的背部”是一项混合方法的研究,采用计划 - 实施 - 研究 - 改进(PDSA)方法,以确保市政康复实践的迭代发展和持续改进。本研究分为几个工作包(WP),重点在于识别经验(工作包1)、梳理当前实践(工作包2)、总结相关文献(工作包3)、举办协同设计研讨会(工作包4),以及通过PDSA循环开发和实施新的康复实践(工作包5)。这些工作包将为新康复实践的开发和实施提供信息,新实践将接受质量和有效性评估(工作包6)以及系统层面的变革评估(工作包7),随后进行结果传播(工作包8)。

讨论

通过一个涉及背部问题患者、市政专业人员和领导者的地方协同设计过程,我们期望实现高度的相关性和参与度,确保成功实施。新做法旨在通过改善康复以及市政社会和卫生专业人员之间的跨学科协作,更好地支持背部问题患者应对日常生活。将引入一个监测地方康复的平台模型,以评估目标人群中的可行性和经济影响。本研究的知识和结果可以传播并适用于丹麦各地的公共环境,甚至可能适用于其他具有类似市政医疗结构的国家。分享实施过程中的最佳实践和经验教训可为不同国际环境下的康复实践提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db56/11660760/539c7103674b/12891_2024_8168_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db56/11660760/539c7103674b/12891_2024_8168_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db56/11660760/539c7103674b/12891_2024_8168_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
My back: co-designing municipal rehabilitation with and for individuals with long-lasting back problems: study protocol.我的背部:与患有长期背部问题的个体共同设计并为其开展市政康复服务:研究方案
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Dec 19;25(1):1038. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08168-5.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Co-creating active communities: processes and outcomes of linking public rehabilitation programs with civic engagement for active living in a Danish municipality.共同创建活跃社区:丹麦一个自治市将公共康复项目与公民参与相结合以促进积极生活的过程与成果
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Sep 14;9(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00495-6.
5
Co-designing municipal multimorbidity rehabilitation leveraging health literacy and social networks: Protocol for the CURIA study.利用健康素养和社交网络共同设计城市多重疾病康复方案:CURIA研究方案
J Multimorb Comorb. 2024 May 21;14:26335565241258353. doi: 10.1177/26335565241258353. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
6
Identifying organisational principles and management practices important to the quality of health care services for chronic conditions.确定对慢性病医疗服务质量至关重要的组织原则和管理实践。
Dan Med J. 2012 Feb;59(2):B4387.
7
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
8
The Physical Activity and Fitness in Childhood Cancer Survivors (PACCS) Study: Protocol for an International Mixed Methods Study.儿童癌症幸存者的身体活动与健康状况(PACCS)研究:一项国际混合方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Mar 8;11(3):e35838. doi: 10.2196/35838.
9
Development of a rehabilitation programme for young adult cancer survivors using co-production.采用共同生产方式为年轻成年癌症幸存者制定康复计划。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Dec 20;10(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00667-y.
10
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.

本文引用的文献

1
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
2
A generative co-design framework for healthcare innovation: development and application of an end-user engagement framework.一种用于医疗保健创新的生成式协同设计框架:终端用户参与框架的开发与应用
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Mar 1;7(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00252-7.
3
Experiences and challenges to cross-sectoral care reported by patients with low back pain. A qualitative interview study.
腰痛患者报告的跨部门护理的经验和挑战。一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 6;20(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4952-x.
4
Design Thinking in Health Care.医疗保健中的设计思维。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Sep 27;15:E117. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.180128.
5
Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview.基层医疗中非特异性下背痛管理的临床实践指南:最新概述。
Eur Spine J. 2018 Nov;27(11):2791-2803. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5673-2. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
6
What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention.什么是下背痛以及为什么我们需要关注它。
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2356-2367. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
7
Physiotherapists may stigmatise or feel unprepared to treat people with low back pain and psychosocial factors that influence recovery: a systematic review.物理治疗师可能会歧视患有腰痛的人,或者觉得没有做好治疗准备,以及那些影响康复的社会心理因素:一项系统综述。
J Physiother. 2015 Apr;61(2):68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.02.016. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
8
Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare.应用计划-执行-研究-行动方法改善医疗保健质量的系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Apr;23(4):290-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001862. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
9
Real-effectiveness medicine--pursuing the best effectiveness in the ordinary care of patients.真实疗效医学——追求普通患者护理中的最佳疗效。
Ann Med. 2013 Mar;45(2):103-6. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2011.653394. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
10
Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L).新的 EQ-5D 五维版本(EQ-5D-5L)的制定和初步测试。
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.