Karademir Sultan Aktuğ, Atasoy Samet, Yılmaz Beyza
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):1507. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05328-w.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different types of bleaching methods and repolishing on the whiteness index and staining susceptibility of additive and subtractive production resin-based materials and direct composite resins.
In this study, a total of 96 samples (882m) were prepared using a nanohybrid composite resin (Neo Spectra-ST (NS)), a subtractive-manufactured nanoceramic resin (Cerasmart270 (CS)), and an additive-manufactured permanent resin (Saremco print Crowntec (CT)). The samples were randomly divided into four treatment groups: control (distilled water, 14 days), in-office bleaching (Opalescence Boost-40% HP, 320min), at-home bleaching (Opalescence PF-16% CP, 6 h, 14 days), and toothpaste group (Opalescence Whitening, 25min, 14 days) (n:8). After each the bleaching procedure was completed, the samples were kept in coffee solution for 7 days. Following, all samples were repolished. The color of the samples was measured with a spectrophotometer at baseline (T), after bleaching (T), after staining in coffee (T) and after repolishing (T). The whiteness index change (∆W, T-T), staining susceptibility (∆E, T-T) and color change after repolishing (∆E, T-T) of the samples were calculated in the CIE (Commission International De I'Eclairage) system. The data were analyzed by SPSS software One-Way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey, post-hoc Tamhane's-T2 and Paired-samples T test (α = 0.05).
The ∆W of all tested materials was significantly different in the in-office bleaching group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Among the bleaching groups, the highest ∆W was obtained in-office bleaching group of CT (2.91 ± 4.12). Staining susceptibility after bleaching (∆E) was higher in the in-office and at-home bleaching groups compared to the control group in all tested materials. However, the difference between the treatment groups was statistically significant in NS and CS (p < 0.05). The highest ∆E was obtained in the in-office group of CT (7.36 ± 4.82). Color changes after repolishing (∆E) of the tested materials were less in all groups compared to ∆E.
In-office and at-home bleaching can increase the whiteness index change and stain susceptibility of materials. Among the tested materials, the color stability of additive-manufactured CT was comparatively poorer. The repolishing was found to be beneficial in reducing staining.
本研究旨在探讨不同类型的漂白方法和再抛光对加成制造和减成制造的树脂基材料以及直接复合树脂的白度指数和染色易感性的影响。
在本研究中,使用纳米混合复合树脂(Neo Spectra-ST (NS))、减材制造的纳米陶瓷树脂(Cerasmart270 (CS))和增材制造的永久性树脂(Saremco print Crowntec (CT))制备了总共96个样本(8×8×2mm)。样本被随机分为四个处理组:对照组(蒸馏水,14天)、诊室漂白组(Opalescence Boost-40% HP,3×20分钟)、家庭漂白组(Opalescence PF-16% CP,6小时,14天)和牙膏组(Opalescence Whitening,2×5分钟,14天)(n = 8)。每次漂白程序完成后,将样本置于咖啡溶液中7天。之后,对所有样本进行再抛光。在基线(T0)、漂白后(T1)、在咖啡中染色后(T2)和再抛光后(T3)用分光光度计测量样本的颜色。在CIE(国际照明委员会)系统中计算样本的白度指数变化(∆W,T1-T0)、染色易感性(∆E,T2-T1)和再抛光后的颜色变化(∆E,T3-T2)。数据采用SPSS软件进行单因素方差分析、事后Tukey检验、事后Tamhane's-T2检验和配对样本T检验(α = 0.05)。
与对照组相比,诊室漂白组中所有测试材料的∆W均有显著差异(p < 0.05)。在所有漂白组中,CT的诊室漂白组获得的∆W最高(2.91±4.12)。在所有测试材料中,诊室漂白组和家庭漂白组漂白后的染色易感性(∆E)高于对照组。然而,在NS和CS中,各处理组之间的差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。CT的诊室组获得的∆E最高(7.36±4.82)。与∆E相比,所有组中测试材料再抛光后的颜色变化(∆E)较小。
诊室漂白和家庭漂白可增加材料的白度指数变化和染色易感性。在测试材料中,增材制造的CT的颜色稳定性相对较差。发现再抛光有利于减少染色。