• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非接触式宫腔镜下手术阴道镜检查在女性生殖息肉治疗中的作用

Role of surgical vaginoscopy through no-touch hysteroscope in the treatment of female reproductive polyps.

作者信息

Li Haixia, Yang Baojun, Gao Wanli, Huang Chunyu, Li Chunxia, Zhao Hui, Feng Limin

机构信息

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02673-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-024-02673-z
PMID:39702228
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11657805/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The study aims to investigate the application of surgical vaginoscopy via a no-touch hysteroscopic approach for the management of female genital polyps. The primary objective is to assess the feasibility of this technique in treating intrauterine pathologies in both pregnant and non-pregnant women.

METHODS

A total of forty-six patients diagnosed with genital polyps underwent operative vaginoscopy at a university-affiliated hospital between April 1, 2017 and May 31, 2023. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the collected data, encompassing patient complaints, clinical presentations, surgical outcomes, and pathological diagnoses. Additionally, the success rate of the vaginoscopic procedures was determined.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients with an average age of 33.0 ± 8.8 years were included in this study. Among them, 25 were non-pregnant (3 with and 22 without a sexual history). The most common clinical manifestation was irregular vaginal bleeding (11/25, 44%) followed by conscious vaginal protrusion (10/25, 40%). Among the 21 pregnant patients, the main symptom was irregular vaginal bleeding during pregnancy (100%). The postoperative pathological diagnoses included 11 endometrial polyps, 33 cervical polyps, 1 multiple vaginal polyps, and 1 vaginal stump polyps. The coincidence rate between the intraoperative vaginoscopic diagnosis and postoperative pathological diagnosis was 100%. Among the non-pregnant patients, 11 were diagnosed with endometrial polyps, with an average length of 2.2 ± 1.2 cm, 1 patient had vaginal residual polyps after total hysterectomy, with a polyp length of 0.3-0.7 cm, and 1 had multiple vaginal polyps, with a length of 0.5-3 cm. Twelve patients had cervical polyps with an average length of 3.4 ± 1.2 cm. Twenty-one pregnant patients were diagnosed with cervical polyps, the average length of 2.4 ± 1.4 cm. All patients successfully underwent vaginoscopic surgery, for an average surgical duration of 23.5 ± 14.9 min, a bleeding volume of 1-10 mL(4.5 ± 3.4 mL), and an average hospitalisation of 2.7 ± 1.3 days. Throughout the surgical procedures, no complications were encountered, including water intoxication or uterine perforation. Postoperatively, no patients experienced discomforts such as fever or moderate to severe abdominal pain. Furthermore, all non-pregnant women were monitored for a two-month period following surgery, and throughout this interval, there were no reports of abnormal vaginal bleeding, unusual vaginal discharge, or abdominal pain. None of the 21 pregnant women experienced abnormal vaginal bleeding after the surgery. Nineteen of them delivered at full term, and one underwent caesarean delivery at 31 weeks owing to placental abruption. All the newborns had Apgar scores of 10, 10, and 10, and one had a miscarriage at 18 weeks of gestation.

CONCLUSION

Vaginoscopic surgery through no-touch hysteroscope represents a minimally invasive and highly effective method for addressing female reproductive tract polyps. This approach holds significant clinical value, particularly in the management of cervical polyps during pregnancy.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d702/11657805/b01ac8496e5e/12893_2024_2673_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d702/11657805/f9863c233f0f/12893_2024_2673_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d702/11657805/b01ac8496e5e/12893_2024_2673_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d702/11657805/f9863c233f0f/12893_2024_2673_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d702/11657805/b01ac8496e5e/12893_2024_2673_Fig2_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨经非接触式宫腔镜手术阴道镜检查在女性生殖器息肉治疗中的应用。主要目的是评估该技术在治疗孕妇和非孕妇子宫内病变方面的可行性。

方法

2017年4月1日至2023年5月31日期间,共有46例被诊断为生殖器息肉的患者在一家大学附属医院接受了手术阴道镜检查。对收集的数据进行回顾性分析,包括患者主诉、临床表现、手术结果和病理诊断。此外,还确定了阴道镜检查程序的成功率。

结果

本研究纳入了46例平均年龄为33.0±8.8岁的患者。其中,25例为非孕妇(3例有性生活史,22例无性生活史)。最常见的临床表现是不规则阴道出血(11/25,44%),其次是自觉阴道肿物脱出(10/25,40%)。21例孕妇中,主要症状是孕期不规则阴道出血(100%)。术后病理诊断包括11例子宫内膜息肉、33例宫颈息肉、1例多发性阴道息肉和1例阴道残端息肉。术中阴道镜诊断与术后病理诊断的符合率为100%。非孕妇中,11例诊断为子宫内膜息肉,平均长度为2.2±1.2cm,1例全子宫切除术后阴道残留息肉,息肉长度为0.3 - 0.7cm,1例有多发性阴道息肉,长度为0.5 - 3cm。12例有宫颈息肉,平均长度为3.4±1.2cm。21例孕妇诊断为宫颈息肉,平均长度为2.4±1.4cm。所有患者均成功接受阴道镜手术,平均手术时间为23.5±14.9分钟,出血量为1 - 10mL(4.5±3.4mL),平均住院时间为2.7±1.3天。在整个手术过程中,未遇到包括水中毒或子宫穿孔在内的并发症。术后,没有患者出现发热或中重度腹痛等不适。此外,所有非孕妇在术后进行了为期两个月的监测,在此期间,没有异常阴道出血、异常阴道分泌物或腹痛的报告。21例孕妇术后均未出现异常阴道出血。其中19例足月分娩,1例因胎盘早剥在31周时行剖宫产。所有新生儿阿氏评分均为10分、10分和10分,1例在妊娠18周时流产。

结论

经非接触式宫腔镜手术阴道镜检查是治疗女性生殖道息肉的一种微创且高效的方法。该方法具有重要的临床价值,尤其在孕期宫颈息肉的治疗中。

相似文献

1
Role of surgical vaginoscopy through no-touch hysteroscope in the treatment of female reproductive polyps.非接触式宫腔镜下手术阴道镜检查在女性生殖息肉治疗中的作用
BMC Surg. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02673-z.
2
Endometriosis presenting as vaginal polyps: outpatient vaginoscopic treatment.子宫内膜异位症表现为阴道息肉:门诊阴道镜治疗。
Fertil Steril. 2021 May;115(5):1353-1355. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.11.021. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
3
When virginity does matter: rigid hysteroscopy for diagnostic and operative vaginoscopy--a series of 26 cases.处女膜重要时:用于诊断性和手术性阴道镜检查的硬性宫腔镜——26例病例系列
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):651-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.05.002.
4
Feasibility of Office-Based Operative Hysteroscopy by a Tissue Removal System Without Anesthesia.局麻下应用组织切除系统行门诊宫腔镜手术的可行性。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2024 Aug;31(8):667-673. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.05.005. Epub 2024 May 11.
5
Effect of Vaginoscopy versus Conventional Hysteroscopy on Pain, Complications, and Patient Satisfaction in Patients with Endometrial Polyps.阴道镜与传统宫腔镜检查对子宫内膜息肉患者疼痛、并发症和患者满意度的影响。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jun 28;2022:3835941. doi: 10.1155/2022/3835941. eCollection 2022.
6
Hysterscopic Resection of Premalignant and Malignant Endometrial Polyps: Is it a Safe Alternative to Hysterectomy?宫腔镜下切除子宫内膜癌前病变及恶性息肉:它是子宫切除术的安全替代方案吗?
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Nov-Dec;24(7):1200-1203. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
7
The efficacy and safety of cervical polypectomy with vaginoscopy in pregnant women.经阴道镜行宫颈息肉切除术治疗孕妇的疗效及安全性。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Oct;310(4):1945-1950. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07583-2. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
8
Pregnancy rates after hysteroscopic polypectomy depending on the size or number of the polyps.宫腔镜息肉切除术后的妊娠率取决于息肉的大小或数量。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008 May;277(5):395-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-007-0460-z. Epub 2007 Sep 13.
9
Application of 'no-touch' hysteroscopy (vaginoscopy) for the treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding in adolescence.“非接触式”宫腔镜检查(阴道镜检查)在青春期异常子宫出血治疗中的应用。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Sep;45(9):1913-1917. doi: 10.1111/jog.14063. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
10
Clinical efficacy study of the IBS (Intergrated Bigatti Shaver) Tissue Removal Device in the treatment of endometrial polyps.IBS(一体化大型刮宫器)组织切除装置治疗子宫内膜息肉的临床疗效研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Nov 30;22(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03605-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationship between unremoved cervical polyp in pregnancy and spontaneous preterm birth.妊娠中未切除宫颈息肉与自发性早产的关系。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Dec;227(6):899.e1-899.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.064. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
2
Surgical management of endocervical and decidual polyps during pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis.妊娠宫颈管及蜕膜息肉的外科处理:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Mar;307(3):673-680. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06550-z. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
3
Assessment of Pain at Different Steps of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy Using Room Temperature Normal Saline versus Warmed Normal Saline Solution as Distension Medium: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
使用室温生理盐水与温热生理盐水溶液作为扩张介质在诊断性宫腔镜检查不同步骤时的疼痛评估:一项随机对照试验
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2022 Feb 14;11(1):41-46. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_5_21. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.
4
Diagnostic office hysteroscopy; why is it still painful procedure despite the surgical experience and mini-hysteroscope?诊断性宫腔镜检查;尽管手术经验和迷你宫腔镜有所改善,为什么它仍然是一个痛苦的过程?
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2022 Jun;48(6):1418-1425. doi: 10.1111/jog.15219. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
5
Cervical polyps in early pregnancy are a risk factor for late abortion and spontaneous preterm birth: A retrospective cohort study.早孕期宫颈息肉是晚期流产和自发性早产的危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Jan;156(1):64-70. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13608. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
6
Retrospective Cohort Study on the Symptomatic Recurrence Pattern after Hysteroscopic Polypectomy.宫腔镜息肉切除术后症状复发模式的回顾性队列研究
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2020 Oct 15;9(4):209-214. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_102_19. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.
7
The Invisible External Cervical Os. Tips and Tricks to Overcome this Challenge during In-Office Hysteroscopy.不可见的宫颈外口。在门诊宫腔镜检查中克服这一挑战的技巧。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Feb;28(2):172-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.05.027. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
8
Endometrial Polyp Removed by a Manual Hysteroscopic Tissue Removal Device.使用手动宫腔镜组织切除装置切除子宫内膜息肉。
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2020 Jan 23;9(1):34-35. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_116_18. eCollection 2020 Jan-Mar.
9
Establishing a Low-Budget Hysteroscopy Unit in a Resource-Poor Setting.在资源匮乏地区建立低成本宫腔镜检查科室。
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2020 Jan 23;9(1):18-23. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_11_19. eCollection 2020 Jan-Mar.
10
Endometrial polyps: Pathogenesis, sequelae and treatment.子宫内膜息肉:发病机制、后遗症及治疗
SAGE Open Med. 2019 May 2;7:2050312119848247. doi: 10.1177/2050312119848247. eCollection 2019.