Cheng Zizhang, Zuo Jinyi, Peng Xintao, Zhang Haoran, Su Wenlong, Luan Guoming, Guan Yuguang
Department of Neurosurgery, SanBo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Beijing Key Laboratory of Epilepsy, Beijing, China.
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024 Dec;30(12):e70183. doi: 10.1111/cns.70183.
Previous studies suggest potential associations between epilepsy, anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs), and levels of vitamin D and vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP). This study aims to investigate the causal relationships among these variables using Mendelian Randomization (MR) methods.
Using summary data from genome-wide association studies on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels (N = 417,580), VDBP concentrations (N = 65,589), and various types of epilepsy (Ncases = 27,559), MR analyses were conducted to determine bidirectional causal relationships among these variables. Additionally, eQTL data from eQTLGen (N = 31,684) were employed to model the effects of AEDs and evaluate their causal impact on both biomarkers.
No causal relationships were found between serum 25(OH)D or VDBP levels and epilepsy. Although genetically predicted focal epilepsy risk was potentially associated with increased serum 25(OH)D levels (OR 1.031, 95% CI: 1.006-1.058, p = 0.017), and a higher genetic risk of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy was linked to lower VDBP levels (OR 0.977, 95% CI: 0.961-0.993, p = 0.004), both associations lost significance after multiple correction. Furthermore, significant associations were observed between serum 25(OH)D levels and AED target genes SCN4A, GABBR1, CA13, ALDH5A1, and CA8. No significant associations were found between AED target genes and VDBP levels after correction.
No causal relationships were found between genetically determined serum 25(OH)D levels, VDBP, and epilepsy or its subtypes. Furthermore, the use of AEDs, such as Carbamazepine, Oxcarbazepine, Progabide, and Valproic Acid, reduces serum 25(OH)D levels, while not affect VDBP levels.
先前的研究表明癫痫、抗癫痫药物(AEDs)与维生素D和维生素D结合蛋白(VDBP)水平之间可能存在关联。本研究旨在使用孟德尔随机化(MR)方法调查这些变量之间的因果关系。
利用全基因组关联研究的汇总数据,涉及血清25-羟基维生素D [25(OH)D]水平(N = 417,580)、VDBP浓度(N = 65,589)和各类癫痫(病例数 = 27,559),进行MR分析以确定这些变量之间的双向因果关系。此外,采用来自eQTLGen的eQTL数据(N = 31,684)对AEDs的作用进行建模,并评估其对两种生物标志物的因果影响。
未发现血清25(OH)D或VDBP水平与癫痫之间存在因果关系。虽然遗传预测的局灶性癫痫风险可能与血清25(OH)D水平升高有关(比值比1.031,95%置信区间:1.006 - 1.058,p = 0.017),且青少年肌阵挛性癫痫的较高遗传风险与较低的VDBP水平相关(比值比0.977,95%置信区间:0.961 - 0.993,p = 0.004),但在多重校正后这两种关联均失去显著性。此外,观察到血清25(OH)D水平与AED靶基因SCN4A、GABBR1、CA13、ALDH5A1和CA8之间存在显著关联。校正后未发现AED靶基因与VDBP水平之间存在显著关联。
在遗传决定的血清25(OH)D水平、VDBP与癫痫或其亚型之间未发现因果关系。此外,使用卡马西平、奥卡西平、普罗加比和丙戊酸等AEDs会降低血清25(OH)D水平,但不影响VDBP水平。