• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我报告反应风格偏差与边缘型人格特征。

Self-report response style bias and borderline personality features.

作者信息

Kaufman Erin A, Beeney Joseph E, Stepp Stephanie D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, 361 Windermere Rd, London, ON N6G 2M1, Canada.

London, Canada.

出版信息

Curr Psychol. 2023 Aug;42(24):20443-20451. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03122-x. Epub 2022 May 5.

DOI:10.1007/s12144-022-03122-x
PMID:39703461
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11658077/
Abstract

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by dichotomous thinking, biases in processing emotion-related information, impulsive responding, and identity disturbance - each of which may affect how individuals respond to assessment items. This study used item-response theory tree models to examine the association between number of self-reported BPD symptoms and response style bias on the NEO Five Factor Inventory-3, administered annually from ages 18 to 20 to 2196 community participants enrolled in the Pittsburgh Girls Study. Small to moderate negative correlations emerged between number of BPD symptoms and midpoint responding. Small correlations emerged between BPD symptoms and extremity responding. These patterns did not vary by age. Participants who endorsed higher initial BPD symptoms reported lower extraversion over time, whereas those initially endorsing midpoint extroversion reported greater decreases in BPD severity. Low initial agreeableness was associated with higher BPD symptom slopes. The current study found only small associations between response style biases and BPD symptoms among a sample with subthreshold symptoms for diagnosis.

摘要

边缘性人格障碍(BPD)的特征是二分法思维、处理与情绪相关信息时的偏差、冲动反应和身份认同障碍——每一项都可能影响个体对评估项目的反应方式。本研究使用项目反应理论树模型,对匹兹堡女孩研究中招募的2196名社区参与者进行了研究,这些参与者年龄在18至20岁至21岁之间,每年接受一次《大五人格量表-3》(NEO Five Factor Inventory-3)测试,以检验自我报告的BPD症状数量与反应风格偏差之间的关联。BPD症状数量与中点反应之间出现了小到中等程度的负相关。BPD症状与极端反应之间出现了小的相关性。这些模式在不同年龄之间没有差异。随着时间的推移,最初认可较高BPD症状的参与者报告外向性较低,而最初认可中点外向性的参与者报告BPD严重程度下降幅度更大。低初始宜人性与较高的BPD症状斜率相关。在一个诊断症状低于阈值的样本中,本研究发现反应风格偏差与BPD症状之间只有很小的关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba83/11658077/547a2e514682/nihms-2028353-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba83/11658077/547a2e514682/nihms-2028353-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba83/11658077/547a2e514682/nihms-2028353-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Self-report response style bias and borderline personality features.自我报告反应风格偏差与边缘型人格特征。
Curr Psychol. 2023 Aug;42(24):20443-20451. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03122-x. Epub 2022 May 5.
2
Differentiating between intrapsychic symptoms and behavioral expressions of borderline personality disorder in relation to childhood emotional maltreatment and emotion dysregulation: an exploratory investigation.探讨童年情绪虐待和情绪失调与边缘型人格障碍的内在心理症状和行为表现的关系。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(2):2263317. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2263317. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
3
Borderline and avoidant personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality: a comparison between DSM-IV diagnoses and NEO-PI-R.边缘型人格障碍与回避型人格障碍及人格五因素模型:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版诊断与大五人格量表的比较
J Pers Disord. 1999 Fall;13(3):226-40. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1999.13.3.226.
4
Exploring Identity Disturbance and Psychotic Spectrum Symptoms as Predictors of Borderline and Schizotypal Personality Disorders.探讨身份障碍和精神病性症状作为边缘型和分裂型人格障碍的预测因子。
Psychopathology. 2021;54(4):193-202. doi: 10.1159/000516209. Epub 2021 May 31.
5
Trait-based assessment of borderline personality disorder using the NEO Five-Factor Inventory: Phenotypic and genetic support.使用大五人格问卷对边缘型人格障碍进行基于特质的评估:表型和遗传支持。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Jan;28(1):39-50. doi: 10.1037/pas0000142. Epub 2015 May 18.
6
Affect intensity and lability: the role of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in borderline personality disorder.情感强度和不稳定性:创伤后应激障碍症状在边缘型人格障碍中的作用。
Depress Anxiety. 2011 May;28(5):393-9. doi: 10.1002/da.20798. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
7
Emotion Recognition and the Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder (SI-Bord): Outcomes and Community-Based Validation.情绪识别与边缘型人格障碍筛查工具(SI-Bord):结果与基于社区的验证
Brain Sci. 2022 Nov 8;12(11):1512. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12111512.
8
Emotion regulation strategies in bipolar II disorder and borderline personality disorder: differences and relationships with perceived parental style.双相情感障碍和边缘型人格障碍的情绪调节策略:差异及其与感知到的父母教养方式的关系。
J Affect Disord. 2014 Mar;157:52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.01.001. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
9
Explicit and Implicit Measures of Identity Diffusion in Adolescent Girls With Borderline Personality Disorder.边缘型人格障碍少女身份扩散的显性和隐性测量
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 3;12:805390. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.805390. eCollection 2021.
10
Age differences in DSM-IV borderline personality disorder symptom expression: Results from a national study using item response theory (IRT).DSM-IV 边缘型人格障碍症状表现的年龄差异:基于项目反应理论(IRT)的全国性研究结果。
J Psychiatr Res. 2019 Mar;110:16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.12.019. Epub 2018 Dec 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Different approaches to modeling response styles in divide-by-total item response theory models (part 2): Applications and novel extensions.不同方法在总分项目反应理论模型中模拟作答反应模式(第 2 部分):应用和新的扩展。
Psychol Methods. 2020 Oct;25(5):577-595. doi: 10.1037/met0000268.
2
Description and prediction of social isolation in borderline patients over 20 years of prospective follow-up.20 多年前瞻性随访中边缘型人格障碍患者社会孤立的描述和预测。
Personal Disord. 2019 Jul;10(4):383-388. doi: 10.1037/per0000337. Epub 2019 May 2.
3
Assessing meaningful within-person variability in Likert-scale rated personality descriptions: An IRT tree approach.
评估李克特量表评定人格描述中的有意义个体内变异性:IRT 树方法。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Apr;31(4):474-487. doi: 10.1037/pas0000600. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
4
Emotional impulsivity is connected to suicide attempts and health care utilization in patients with borderline personality disorder.情绪冲动与边缘型人格障碍患者的自杀未遂及医疗保健利用情况相关。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2019 Jan-Feb;56:54-55. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
5
Self-Other Agreement in Personality Reports: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Self- and Informant-Report Means.人格报告中的自我-他人一致性:自我报告和知情者报告均值的元分析比较。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Jan;30(1):129-138. doi: 10.1177/0956797618810000. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
6
Personality disorder traits: Testing insight regarding presence of traits, impairment, and desire for change.人格障碍特征:测试关于特征、损害和改变意愿的存在的洞察力。
Personal Disord. 2019 Mar;10(2):123-131. doi: 10.1037/per0000305. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
7
Using reversed items in Likert scales: A questionable practice.在李克特量表中使用反向项目:一种有问题的做法。
Psicothema. 2018 May;30(2):149-158. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2018.33.
8
Response style analysis with threshold and multi-process IRT models: A review and tutorial.基于阈值和多过程IRT模型的反应风格分析:综述与教程
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2017 Feb;70(1):159-181. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12086.
9
A flexible full-information approach to the modeling of response styles.一种灵活的全信息方法来建模反应风格。
Psychol Methods. 2016 Sep;21(3):328-47. doi: 10.1037/met0000059. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
10
The Stability of Extreme Response Style and Acquiescence Over 8 Years.极端反应风格与默认反应在8年时间内的稳定性。
Assessment. 2016 Jun;23(3):279-91. doi: 10.1177/1073191115583714. Epub 2015 May 18.