• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对抄袭的认知:伊朗医学专业研究生问卷的适应性、有效性和可靠性

Awareness of plagiarism: Adaption, validity, and reliability of questionnaires in Iranian medical sciences for post-graduate students.

作者信息

Sabaghinejad Zivar, Parsaei-Mohammadi Parastoo, Khanfari Narges

机构信息

Knowledge and Information Science, Department of Medical Library and Information Science, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

Department of Medical Library and Information Science, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

出版信息

J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Oct 28;13:379. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_86_24. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_86_24
PMID:39703635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11657895/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Academic plagiarism affects the ethical aspects of research and can be in relation with valid health information distribution. The aim of this research is designing, validating, and standardizing the plagiarism awareness questionnaire for awareness of plagiarism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study is cross-sectional and was done in medical sciences post-graduate students. Adaption, validity, and reliability were done. The validation population were 11 experts (one linguistics and ten medical library and information sciences). The reliability population includes 333 post-graduate students in Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences in 2022. Cultural adaption, face and content validity, reliability (exploratory and confirmed factor analysis), and correlation (Pearson coefficient) were checked using SPSS and Amos software ver24.

RESULTS

Cultural adaption was confirmed based on the experts' viewpoint using translation and re-translation. The CVR was 0.81, and content validity was confirmed. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted for a model with six factors and 30 items. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a model with six factors and 28 items (items 3 and 29 were removed). Cronbach's alpha was 0.86. The plagiarism awareness model (PAM) has six factors, "authenticating", "citing", "understanding", "insight", "paraphrasing", and "attitude", which can explain 54.353% of variances. IFI = 0.759, CFI = 0.755, NFI = 0.717, AGFI = 0.789, GFI = 0.826, and RMSEA = 0.073, and the PAM model was confirmed. The results of Pearson correlation showed a significant correlation between all factors.

CONCLUSION

The PAM model has six factors and 28 items and was confirmed for plagiarism awareness study. This model can be considered by managers and can be used in health promotion research studies.

PAPER TYPE

Research Article.

摘要

背景

学术抄袭影响研究的伦理层面,且可能与有效健康信息的传播相关。本研究旨在设计、验证并规范用于剽窃认知的剽窃意识问卷。

材料与方法

本研究为横断面研究,针对医学专业研究生开展。进行了改编、效度和信度分析。验证人群为11位专家(1名语言学专家和10名医学图书馆与信息科学专家)。信度人群包括2022年阿瓦士军迪沙普尔医科大学的333名研究生。使用SPSS和Amos软件版本24检查了文化适应性、表面效度和内容效度、信度(探索性和验证性因子分析)以及相关性(皮尔逊系数)。

结果

基于专家观点,通过翻译和回译确认了文化适应性。内容效度比(CVR)为0.81,确认了内容效度。对一个包含六个因子和30个条目的模型进行了探索性因子分析。验证性因子分析确认了一个包含六个因子和28个条目的模型(删除了条目3和29)。克朗巴哈系数(Cronbach's alpha)为0.86。剽窃意识模型(PAM)有六个因子,即“认证”“引用”“理解”“洞察”“释义”和“态度”,可解释54.353%的方差。IFI = 0.759,CFI = 0.755,NFI = 0.717,AGFI = 0.789,GFI = 0.826,RMSEA = 0.073,确认了PAM模型。皮尔逊相关性结果显示所有因子之间存在显著相关性。

结论

PAM模型有六个因子和28个条目,已被确认可用于剽窃意识研究。该模型可供管理人员考虑,并可用于健康促进研究。

论文类型

研究文章。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e96e/11657895/ccd9819323fc/JEHP-13-379-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e96e/11657895/58c700a7665f/JEHP-13-379-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e96e/11657895/ccd9819323fc/JEHP-13-379-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e96e/11657895/58c700a7665f/JEHP-13-379-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e96e/11657895/ccd9819323fc/JEHP-13-379-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Awareness of plagiarism: Adaption, validity, and reliability of questionnaires in Iranian medical sciences for post-graduate students.对抄袭的认知:伊朗医学专业研究生问卷的适应性、有效性和可靠性
J Educ Health Promot. 2024 Oct 28;13:379. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_86_24. eCollection 2024.
2
The validity and reliability properties of a Persian version of the evidence-based practice profile (EBP) questionnaire among Iranian students of health-related fields.一个基于证据的实践概况(EBP)问卷的波斯语版本在伊朗健康相关领域学生中的有效性和可靠性特性。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):1143. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06139-x.
3
Psychometric validation of the Persian version of the ethical awareness scale for nurses working in Iranian intensive care units.护理人员伦理意识量表在伊朗重症监护病房的信度效度检验。
Nurs Open. 2024 Jun;11(6):e2168. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2168.
4
Validity and reliability of the TechPH scale in assessing Iranian older adults' attitudes toward technology.评估伊朗老年人对技术态度的 TechPH 量表的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Nov 5;24(1):907. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05502-3.
5
Development and Validation of the Resident Healthcare-Seeking Culture Scale (RHCS) Among Chinese Demographics in the Community Setting.社区环境中中国人群居民就医文化量表(RHCS)的编制与验证
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Dec 12;17:3147-3159. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S462808. eCollection 2024.
6
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of Persian version of Evidence Based Medicine Questionnaire (EBMQ) in postgraduate medical students in Iran.伊朗医学研究生的循证医学问卷(EBMQ)波斯语版本的翻译与跨文化调适。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0301831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301831. eCollection 2024.
7
Development of a Chinese version of the Stress Adaption Scale and the assessment of its reliability and validity among Chinese patients with multimorbidity.中文版本的应激适应量表的开发及在中国多病种患者中评估其信度和效度。
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Jun 25;52(3):361-370. doi: 10.3724/zdxbyxb-2022-0721.
8
Validation of Medical Tourism Service Quality Questionnaire (MTSQQ) for Iranian Hospitals.伊朗医院医疗旅游服务质量问卷(MTSQQ)的验证
Electron Physician. 2017 Mar 25;9(3):3905-3911. doi: 10.19082/3905. eCollection 2017 Mar.
9
Does the Farsi version of attitude toward plagiarism questionnaire have acceptable psychometric properties?波斯语版的抄袭态度问卷是否具有可接受的心理测量学特性?
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2022 Mar 8;15:1. doi: 10.18502/jmehm.v15i1.8900. eCollection 2022.
10
Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Persian version of the overactive bladder questionnaire (OAB-V8).膀胱过度活动症问卷波斯语版(OAB-V8)的跨文化适应性、信度和效度
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 3;10(11):e32298. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32298. eCollection 2024 Jun 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Does the Farsi version of attitude toward plagiarism questionnaire have acceptable psychometric properties?波斯语版的抄袭态度问卷是否具有可接受的心理测量学特性?
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2022 Mar 8;15:1. doi: 10.18502/jmehm.v15i1.8900. eCollection 2022.
2
Assessing knowledge of and attitudes towards plagiarism and ability to recognize plagiaristic writing among university students in Rwanda.评估卢旺达大学生对抄袭的认知与态度以及识别抄袭作品的能力。
High Educ (Dordr). 2023;85(2):247-263. doi: 10.1007/s10734-022-00830-y. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
3
Plagiarism among nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
护理专业学生中的剽窃行为:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Nurs Rev. 2022 Dec;69(4):492-502. doi: 10.1111/inr.12755. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
4
Contract cheating: an increasing challenge for global academic community arising from COVID-19.合同作弊:新冠疫情给全球学术界带来的日益严峻的挑战。
Res Pract Technol Enhanc Learn. 2021;16(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s41039-021-00166-8. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
5
Comparison of the effect of training academic honesty using two workshop and virtual training methods on the knowledge and attitude of M. S. students.比较两种研讨会和虚拟培训方法在培养学术诚信方面对硕士生知识和态度的影响。
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 May 31;10(1):180. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1145_20. eCollection 2021.
6
Error analysis of nonnative authors' publications in health-care journals: A descriptive study.医疗保健期刊中非本国作者发表文章的错误分析:一项描述性研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Mar 31;10:107. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_793_20. eCollection 2021.
7
Validation of an instructional module to help dental students learn to avoid plagiarism.验证一个教学模块,帮助牙科学生学习避免抄袭。
J Dent Educ. 2021 Apr;85(4):562-568. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12491. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
8
Plagiarism in nursing education: an integrative review.护理教育中的抄袭现象:一项综合综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Oct;26(19-20):2845-2864. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13629. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
9
Measuring students' perceptions of plagiarism: modification and Rasch validation of a plagiarism attitude scale.测量学生对抄袭的认知:抄袭态度量表的修订与拉施克效度验证
J Appl Meas. 2014;15(4):372-93.
10
The ethics of scholarly publishing: exploring differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication across nations.学术出版的伦理:探究各国在抄袭和重复发表方面的差异。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2014 Apr;102(2):87-91. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.102.2.005.